On 30.07.2012 08:33, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
On 30.07.2012 11:04, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
I am aware about how this thing works and what it does. However, every
time I upgrade new server I got hit by it again and again, simply
forgetting to remove it from the kernel's config.
I'm afraid
Hi Pawel / All
I have a system with 2 AMD Opteron 285's in it with the second cores
disabled so effectively a 2 CPU single core each setup.
I run the following:
# kldload geom_zero
# geli onetime -s 4096 /dev/gzero
# dd if=/dev/gzero of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1k
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records
On Monday, July 16, 2012 5:39:26 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 13/07/2012 19:31 Sean Bruno said the following:
pcib7: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 28.0 on pci0
pcib7: domain0
pcib7: secondary bus 7
pcib7: subordinate bus 7
pcib7: no prefetched decode
Hello,
Until today, when I was asked what WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes should do.. i
was obviously wrong:
I think whole openssl should be replaced, but :
[mym:~] # which openssl
/usr/bin/openssl
[mym:~] # openssl version
OpenSSL 0.9.8x 10 May 2012
there IS a 1.0.1 version but it is not found whit
Am 07/30/12 20:04, schrieb Beat Siegenthaler:
Hello,
Until today, when I was asked what WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes should do.. i
was obviously wrong:
I think whole openssl should be replaced, but :
[mym:~] # which openssl
/usr/bin/openssl
[mym:~] # openssl version
OpenSSL 0.9.8x 10 May 2012
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 20:36 +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
Am 07/30/12 20:04, schrieb Beat Siegenthaler:
Hello,
Until today, when I was asked what WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes should do.. i
was obviously wrong:
I think whole openssl should be replaced, but :
[mym:~] # which openssl
On 30.07.12 20:36, O. Hartmann wrote
I guess you need to ensure that the path /usr/local/bin is searched BEFORE
/usr/bin. If you're using
sh(1) as the standard shell of yours, you should ensure this by using
something like the following in .profile (or .cshrc, if csh(1)):
Never tweaked that:
Am 07/30/12 20:46, schrieb Ian Lepore:
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 20:36 +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
Am 07/30/12 20:04, schrieb Beat Siegenthaler:
Hello,
Until today, when I was asked what WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes should do.. i
was obviously wrong:
I think whole openssl should be replaced, but :
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:01:23 +0200
Beat Siegenthaler beat.siegentha...@beatsnet.com wrote:
It seems to be important to know, what build from port means. There is
still some tweaking necessary.
thanks
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
On 30/07/2012 21:38, Chuck Burns wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:01:23 +0200
Beat Siegenthaler beat.siegentha...@beatsnet.com wrote:
It seems to be important to know, what build from port means. There is
still some tweaking necessary.
Is it possible that openssl in base is just left over from
July 30, 2012
Dear Community Leader,
The Community Collaborative Networks at http://www.lcnets.org is inviting
members to join.
While a social network is for sharing of personal news and events, a community
collaborative network is for sharing of resources (including information and
tools)
Dear Everyone,
I am running FreeBSD 9.1-BETA1 amd64 on ZFS in KVM on Gentoo Linux on
ZFS. The root pool uses ashift=13 and is on a single disk. The kernel
fails to mount the root filesystem if the system has more than 3584MB of
RAM. I did a manual binary search to try to find the exact upper
12 matches
Mail list logo