On 20 Feb 2013, at 06:03, Nurhermansyah eka ekanoti...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all..
if I could make a stable version for freebsd 9.1-release ??
thanks
Hi,
Did you mean I'm running 9.1-RELEASE and I want to update it to 9-STABLE ?
If not, kindly clarify...
Here, I think this is what you're looking for:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html
You should be able to move from 9.1-RELEASE to 9-STABLE with freebsd-update :)
On Feb 20, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Nurhermansyah eka ekanoti...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
oh ya ..
On Feb 20, 2013, at 4:29 AM, Fleuriot Damien m...@my.gd wrote:
Here, I think this is what you're looking for:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html
You should be able to move from 9.1-RELEASE to 9-STABLE with freebsd-update :)
Except that the
On Feb 20, 2013, at 3:09 PM, Paul Mather p...@gromit.dlib.vt.edu wrote:
On Feb 20, 2013, at 4:29 AM, Fleuriot Damien m...@my.gd wrote:
Here, I think this is what you're looking for:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html
You should be able to move
Succeed. Thank you.
--
Zhihao Yuan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de wrote:
Am 05.02.2013 um 23:06 schrieb Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de:
Am 05.02.2013 um 19:09 schrieb Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013
Hello,
we use NanoBSD to build the software installations for our hosting platform
and I'm trying to better automate the process of building packages.
Poudriere looked like an interesting tool to me, so I tried it. Quite painless,
but two questions currently remain:
To me it looks like
On 02/20/13 17:08, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Hello,
we use NanoBSD to build the software installations for our hosting platform
and I'm trying to better automate the process of building packages.
Poudriere looked like an interesting tool to me, so I tried it. Quite painless,
but two questions
Hello,
Am 20.02.2013 um 18:07 schrieb Guido Falsi m...@madpilot.net:
I'm not sure I get what you ask. You can make poudriere fetch sources from
any subversion branch/tag and compile those
instead of using the distribution files. For example:
poudriere jail -c -j 91releng -v releng/9.1 -m
On 02/20/13 18:19, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Hello,
Am 20.02.2013 um 18:07 schrieb Guido Falsi m...@madpilot.net:
I'm not sure I get what you ask. You can make poudriere fetch sources from any
subversion branch/tag and compile those
instead of using the distribution files. For example:
Am 19.02.2013 19:54, schrieb Mikhail T.:
These were, indeed, complaints, but not about the port not working
after I broke it. My complaint is that, though the port works out of
the box, the office@ maintainers have given up on the base compiler too
easily -- comments in the makefile make no
I was having problems with broken missing dependencies, etc. Long story short
I fixed it by wiping a lot of stuff and reinstalling it, but now portmaster
does not seem to be working. running portmaster -l lists none of the installed
ports.
Any ideas on how to fix it?
What about either of these 2 ?
pkg_info
pkg info
On Feb 20, 2013, at 8:14 PM, Craig Yoshioka crai...@nanoimagingservices.com
wrote:
I was having problems with broken missing dependencies, etc. Long story
short I fixed it by wiping a lot of stuff and reinstalling it, but now
Then, I'm taking a wild guess at what I think is happening.
You have WITH_PKGNG=yes in /etc/make.conf
Your portmaster is built without the PKGNG patch.
Would you go to /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster/
then issue 'make config'
If I'm right, you're only missing the patch, tick the option and
Hi.
I have a bunch of FreeBSDs that hangs (and I really want to do something
to fight this). May be it's the zfs or may be it's the pf (I also have a
bunch of really stable ones, so it's hard to isolate and tell). Since
9.x hang more often I suppose it's pf. I use ichwd.ko and watchdogd to
On 2/20/13 11:36 AM, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Hi.
I have a bunch of FreeBSDs that hangs (and I really want to do
something to fight this). May be it's the zfs or may be it's the pf (I
also have a bunch of really stable ones, so it's hard to isolate and
tell). Since 9.x hang more often I
fixed
you, sir, are a rock star.
---
Craig Yoshioka, Ph.D.
(619) 623-2233 (cell)
The Scripps Research Institute
10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd.
La Jolla, CA 92037
On Feb 20, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Fleuriot Damien m...@my.gdmailto:m...@my.gd
On 2013-Feb-19 09:23:37 -0500, Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
See, my understanding always was, the only possible reasons for a
compiler to produce a non-starting executable are:
1. The code is buggy.
2. The compiler is buggy.
3. Both of the above.
My question was, which is it?
Hi, Guido,
Am 20.02.2013 um 18:28 schrieb Guido Falsi m...@madpilot.net:
Is there no way to specify make variables that need values in the port
specific
options file?
There is no per port file, but, bbeing make.conf a file sourced by make, you
can use make syntax:
.if
Glad I could help :)
On 20 Feb 2013, at 21:00, Craig Yoshida crai...@scripps.edu wrote:
fixed
you, sir, are a rock star.
---
Craig Yoshioka, Ph.D.
(619) 623-2233 (cell)
The Scripps Research Institute
10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd.
20.02.2013 15:41, Peter Jeremy ???(??):
You left out:
4. Code relies on language features that are not supported by the compiler.
(It's not a bug that gcc 4.2.1 (eg) doesn't suppert C++11)
If a compiler does not support a feature, it is supposed to error-out
upon encountering it, not
On 20 February 2013 13:53, Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
As others have indicated, the toolchain provided in the base system is
intended only for building the base system.
This was never true before and it is rather sad, if it were really
becoming the truth now. More than
On 2/20/13, Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de wrote:
What is your point, besides getting software from the museum to build
stuff from the relative future?
I can't speak for the OP, but I tried it because clang, gcc46, and
gcc47 wouldn't produce a working executable at all for a long time
On 17 Feb, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
Hello,
I'm running FreeBSD 8.3-stable on a machine with an AMD A8-5600K cpu.
tingo@kg-quiet$ uname -a
FreeBSD kg-quiet.kg4.no 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #2: Fri Jan 4 19:18:15
CET 2013
r...@kg-quiet.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:29:05PM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 17 Feb, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
Hello,
I'm running FreeBSD 8.3-stable on a machine with an AMD A8-5600K cpu.
tingo@kg-quiet$ uname -a
FreeBSD kg-quiet.kg4.no 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #2: Fri Jan 4
19:18:15 CET 2013
25 matches
Mail list logo
