Greetings,
I know this sounds crazy, and apologies if I am. But I have 2 RELENG_8 servers;
1 amd64, and 1 i386. about 3 wks ago, I migrated from cv(sup) updating, to svn
on
the amd64 box.
After removing cv(sup) related folders, and the ports folder, I used:
portsnap fetch
After the fetch
On 31/07/2013 01:31, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
But here is an idea: Remove BIND from HEAD overnight and see how many
will complain ;-) If nobody complains, don't put it back in.
Or change the default to off. If you want bind add WITH_BIND=yes to src.conf
It's hard to say FreeBSD is a safe and
Considering the topic, and how many times it's come up. I'm not sure that's
a
nything to
be proud of. ;)
Given not all CVE's are created equal and given the amount of
internal self consistancy checks (all of which kill the server if
they don't pass (and push the CVSS score to 7.x))
As I can see official intruction for upgrading says to do three times
of freebsd-update install (between reboots).
But I did two because at third time my system says
No updates are available to install.
Run '/usr/sbin/freebsd-update fetch' first.
2013/7/30 Pavel Timofeev tim...@gmail.com:
Sorry,
In order to test ZFS on the upcoming 9.2 release, we upgraded a
non-production 8.4 root-on-ZFS fileserver to 9.2-BETA2.
The result was a non-bootable system. The first problem was
gptzfsboot, but that was our fault… it never got upgraded when we
switched to feature flags. So some time with the
David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com writes:
For years, a lot of security advisories have been present for bind.
I'm just guessing if it's not a good idea to remove bind from base?
There are plans to do so. It's not as trivial as people seem to think.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav -
Hello
I've updated (with freebsd-update) an old 7.3 to 9.1-RELEASE and now I
cannot build at least one port.
ports-mgmt/pkg
=== Building for pkg-1.1.4_1
sed -e 's,%%PKGVERSION%%,1.1.4,' Doxyfile.in Doxyfile
=== external (all)
=== external/sqlite (all)
Warning: Object directory not changed
On 07/29/2013 11:18, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Hello,
My entry for newsyslog in /etc/crontab is:
0 * * * * rootnewsyslog -t \%Y-\%m-\%d_\%H:\%M
And I get:
newsyslog: Could not convert time string to time value: No such file or
directory
I try to use the newsyslog from head
On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 03:49-0400, J David wrote:
In order to test ZFS on the upcoming 9.2 release, we upgraded a
non-production 8.4 root-on-ZFS fileserver to 9.2-BETA2.
The result was a non-bootable system. The first problem was
gptzfsboot, but that was our fault? it never got upgraded when
Looks like my sendmail uses only IPv6 to resolve mx server dns name to
ip address.
14:59:50.793338 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.19032 hercules.xxx.ru.domain:
53417+ ? xxx.ru. (24)
[13/98]
14:59:50.793662 IP hercules.xxx.ru.domain
On 31.07.13 09:38, Shane Ambler wrote:
On 31/07/2013 01:31, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
But here is an idea: Remove BIND from HEAD overnight and see how many
will complain ;-) If nobody complains, don't put it back in.
Or change the default to off. If you want bind add WITH_BIND=yes to
src.conf
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013, at 6:15, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
On 31.07.13 09:38, Shane Ambler wrote:
For something that needs to be constantly updated in between system
updates then ports is the place to install it from.
You don't have to update BIND constantly, especially if you are not
I wanted to say that sendmail asks only (IPv6) record of mx
server, but not A (IPv4).
Any ideas?
2013/7/31 Pavel Timofeev tim...@gmail.com:
Looks like my sendmail uses only IPv6 to resolve mx server dns name to
ip address.
14:59:50.793338 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.19032
On 31/07/2013 15:44, Chris H wrote:
Greetings,
I know this sounds crazy, and apologies if I am. But I have 2 RELENG_8
servers;
1 amd64, and 1 i386. about 3 wks ago, I migrated from cv(sup) updating, to svn
on
the amd64 box.
After removing cv(sup) related folders, and the ports folder, I
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 07:22:20AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
Let's take a moment and consider the state of the internet and DNS
attacks. The RRL and RPZ2 patchsets[1] are newer developments that
successfully add additional security and features to BIND. It was also
recently announced that
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013, at 7:37, Erwin Lansing wrote:
3rd party, and especially those that are still being distributed as
experimental, will not be part of the base BIND code. It will only
contain a direct import from the vendor sources.
I agree, experimental patches have no place in base.
On 31/07/2013 13:24, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
I wanted to say that sendmail asks only (IPv6) record of mx
server, but not A (IPv4).
Any ideas?
ip6addrctl(8) perhaps?
Also check /etc/rc.d/ip6addrctl and the variables used by that script in
/etc/defaults/rc.conf which you can use to set
I've just installed new fresh 9.2-BETA2 amd64 on another machine.
Same behaviour - Sendmail asks DNS only for record of mx server.
We don't use IPv6 in our company.
2013/7/31 Pavel Timofeev tim...@gmail.com:
I wanted to say that sendmail asks only (IPv6) record of mx
server, but not A
On 31.07.13 15:22, Mark Felder wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013, at 6:15, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
On 31.07.13 09:38, Shane Ambler wrote:
For something that needs to be constantly updated in between system
updates then ports is the place to install it from.
You don't have to update BIND constantly,
Hi,
I am trying to make a FreeBSD 9.2 hybrid image (ie ISO USB from the same
file) and as part of that I need to use syslinux. Unfortunately I can't get
Syslinux's mboot.c32 to run the kernel or loader as suggested at
http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Mboot.c32 - it reports Invalid
You could see at mine experience long long time ago:
http://trac.pcbsd.org/wiki/UsbFatBoot
Maybe it's still relevant :)
2013/7/31 Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au
Hi,
I am trying to make a FreeBSD 9.2 hybrid image (ie ISO USB from the same
file) and as part of that I need to use
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to make a FreeBSD 9.2 hybrid image (ie ISO USB from the same
file) and as part of that I need to
use syslinux. Unfortunately I can't get Syslinux's mboot.c32 to run the
kernel or loader as
Greetings, and thank you for your response.
On 31/07/2013 15:44, Chris H wrote:
Greetings,
I know this sounds crazy, and apologies if I am. But I have 2 RELENG_8
servers;
1 amd64, and 1 i386. about 3 wks ago, I migrated from cv(sup) updating, to
svn on
the amd64 box.
After removing
On Wed, July 31, 2013 02:55, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
I'm also more than a little surprised about people dragging out
sendmail as a shining example of *good* (bug-free?) software. Does
nobody remember any history here? It wasn't *that* many years ago
that we seemed to have
On 01/08/2013 00:28, Chris H wrote:
In the first instance, /usr/ports was removed (before initiating portsnap). But
before
the second attempt, I performed a mkdir /usr/ports. But in the end, the results
were
the same;
portsnap fetch fetched the image, verified the image,
extracted to
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Trond Endrestøl
trond.endres...@fagskolen.gjovik.no wrote:
I'm curious as to why you use da?p1 as the freebsd-zfs partitions.
Those are whole-disk partitions.
Where does the freebsd-boot partition reside? da?p2?
Only the log and cache disks have boot and swap
On Jul 31, 2013, at 6:38 AM, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to make a FreeBSD 9.2 hybrid image (ie ISO USB from the same
file) and as part of that I need to use syslinux. Unfortunately I can't get
Syslinux's mboot.c32 to run the kernel or loader as suggested at
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Pavel Timofeev tim...@gmail.com wrote:
I've just installed new fresh 9.2-BETA2 amd64 on another machine.
Same behavior - Sendmail asks DNS only for record of mx server.
We also noticed one of our machines suddenly started using IPv6 to
send outbound email
On 01/08/2013 00:28, Chris H wrote:
In the first instance, /usr/ports was removed (before initiating portsnap).
But before
the second attempt, I performed a mkdir /usr/ports. But in the end, the
results were
the same;
portsnap fetch fetched the image, verified the image,
extracted to
On 01/08/2013, at 1:45, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote:
Has anyone had any success with this?
Absolutely.
You can download and dissect the following to show you how it's done...
http://druidbsd.sourceforge.net/download.shtml#FreeBSD_Druid
It uses syslinux, as you can
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Daniel O'Connor
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 4:32 PM
To: Devin Teske
Cc: freebsd-stable stable
Subject: Re: Booting FreeBSD with Syslinux
On 01/08/2013, at
On 01/08/2013, at 9:04, dte...@freebsd.org wrote:
Have you tried mboot?
No I have not.
Do you know anyone that has got it to work?
Supposedly someone got it to work because there is an entry in the syslinux wiki
http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Mboot.c32#FreeBSD_example
That was
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.auwrote:
That was for 7.x though, maybe the kernel has changed a bit.
It doesn't say that at all. Nor does it say the exact release(even major
branch isn't mentioned) which was confirmed to work, when or if it was
tried, the
On 01/08/2013, at 9:41, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au
wrote:
That was for 7.x though, maybe the kernel has changed a bit.
It doesn't say that at all. Nor does it say the exact release(even major
On Thu, 1 Aug 2013, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On 01/08/2013, at 9:04, dte...@freebsd.org wrote:
Have you tried mboot?
No I have not.
Do you know anyone that has got it to work?
Supposedly someone got it to work because there is an entry in the syslinux wiki
On 01/08/2013, at 12:15, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
Supposedly someone got it to work because there is an entry in the syslinux
wiki
http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Mboot.c32#FreeBSD_example
I'm following the threads on both lists, and that example looks more like a
On 01/08/2013 01:42, J David wrote:
=34 1953525101 da2 GPT (931G)
34 222 - free - (111k)
256 19535084951 freebsd-zfs (931G)
1953508751 163849 !6a945a3b-1dd2-11b2-99a6-080020736631 (8.0M)
da3 - da7 are identical to da2.
So
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Shane Ambler free...@shaneware.biz wrote:
I think that 8M partition looks weird. It looks like a leftover from a
previous config?
We leave some space at the end of drives in case we need to change
drive vendors. Sometimes vendor A's drives are a few sectors
38 matches
Mail list logo
