Alrighteeee ... > Am 13.04.2019 um 02:37 schrieb Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com>: > > There's been some minor improvements in -current here. Any chance you could > > experimentally try that with this test? You won't get as many I/O abort > > errors (since we don't print those), and we have a few more workarounds for > > the reset path (though honestly, it's still kinda stinky). > > HEAD or RELENG_12, too? > > HEAD is preferred, but any recent snapshot will do.
I could not reproduce the problem for a couple of hours with an otherwise identical system but only 4 of these Intel drives. Now the same test system with 6 drives just as our FreeNAS boxes - instantly reproducible. I’ll upgrade to HEAD and see if that changes anything. Kind regards Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Kaiserallee 13a Tel.: 0721 9109-0 Fax: -100 76133 Karlsruhe i...@punkt.de http://punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Gf: Juergen Egeling _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
