Re: clocked speed not showing in dev.cpu.[0-7].freq

On 2021-04-27 11:28, Ian Lepore wrote: On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 19:22 +0100, tech-lists wrote: Hi, Not sure where to put this. system is amd64/stable/13. It's running powerd but with no additional flags. CPU is Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU. Has 32GB RAM The system is clocked in the bios at

Re: clocked speed not showing in dev.cpu.[0-7].freq

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 12:28:53PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: The same is true on my system: CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU W3680 @ 3.33GHz (4250.09-MHz K8-class CPU) Thank you Ian for confirming -- J. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: clocked speed not showing in dev.cpu.[0-7].freq

On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 19:22 +0100, tech-lists wrote: > Hi, > > Not sure where to put this. system is amd64/stable/13. It's running > powerd but with no additional flags. > > CPU is Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU. Has 32GB RAM > > The system is clocked in the bios at 4.251 GHz. I never see this

clocked speed not showing in dev.cpu.[0-7].freq

Hi, Not sure where to put this. system is amd64/stable/13. It's running powerd but with no additional flags. CPU is Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU. Has 32GB RAM The system is clocked in the bios at 4.251 GHz. I never see this value in sysctl dev.cpu.[0-7].freq though. Here's the output: [...]

Re: clean update 12.2 > 13.0

For me too. I upgraded a server from 12.2-p5 to 13.0 2 weeks ago and the only thing “extra” I had ti do we import my ZFS pool which is expected as it was a different version :) More servers to do soon! \\Clay > On 27 Apr 2021, at 07:51, Chris wrote: > > Great

clean update 12.2 > 13.0

Wow.. Best update I have done in years. At least for me 12.2 > 13.0 was great.  Great job ! ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: using interface groups in pf tables stopped working in 13.0-RELEASE

>>> >> I can >> It looks like there’s some confusion inside pfctl about the network group. >> It ends up in pfctl_parser.c, append_addr_host(), and expects an AF_INET or >> AF_INET6, but instead gets an AF_LINK. >> >> It’s probably related to 250994 or possibly >>

Re: using interface groups in pf tables stopped working in 13.0-RELEASE

On 16 Apr 2021, at 17:58, Kristof Provost wrote: On 14 Apr 2021, at 16:16, Peter Ankerstål wrote: In pf I use the interface group syntax alot to make the configuration more readable. All interfaces are assigned to a group representing its use/vlan name. For example: