of stability, I still havent seen a
lockup/crash on any of my 6.1 servers and they are all prerelease.
It did shock me tho they didnt simply repackage the 6.1 release with
updated errata notes it will look amatuerish to have outdated notes in
the package.
Chris
On 11/05/06, Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 08:16:42PM +0100, Chris wrote:
GNATS didnt reply so I will send the info about email address I used
and see if I can find the pr number as well.
Any problems you have with GNATS not responding, please email them
Apologies if posted to wrong list, the rc.d script for named chowns
/etc/namedb to root:wheel if set to bind:bind why is this? A slave
named server running as bind user cannot download new slave zones if
dir ownership is root or update it if file ownerships are root which I
sometimes see.
Chris
gname=wheel mode=0755
var uname=root
dump
..
log
..
run
named
..
..
stats
..
..
..
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
freebsd nfs having problems with other OS's nfs.
The crashes arent so bad the killer is the unable to mount on the
following reboot, could geli be causing this since this is relatvely
new, whilst gdbe is more established. Can gdbe be used on loopback
filesystems?
Thanks
Chris
and smoother on pretty much every UP setup and I
think it would do freebsd's reputation some good if a 4.12 was to come
about.
just my 2 pence worth.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
Its been mentioned before and most experience the same as you by
setting it to 16 a dramatic improvement in the sequential read, I
currently run all my 5.x servers like this with no issues as a result.
I am curious if the default will ever be changed.
Chris
On 22/07/05, Mark Kirkwood [EMAIL
but it
swaps like mad when compiling. Kismet and deps took over 12 hours. Just
after boot and not doing anything it has about 2mb free and 17 processes
running.
Thanks for any suggestions
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Chris wrote:
Hi
The installation notes for 4.11 say, referring to i386 platform
...after installation, FreeBSD itself can be run in 4-8MB of RAM
with a pared-down kernel
The installation notes for 5.4 and 6 (the floppies README.TXT) say
FreeBSD for the i386 requires ...at least 24 MB
Thanks for all replies and suggestions. sounds like I can give 6 a try.
I can move the hd to a bigger machine for installing and compiling.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
Chris wrote:
Thanks for all replies and suggestions. sounds like I can give 6 a try.
I can move the hd to a bigger machine for installing and compiling.
...except that pcic and card have been removed from -current :( so it's
back to 5.4R
chris
.
Ah I've just checked in firefox and part of the handbook prob is that
the link is no longer on the front page. I would vote for documentation
back on the front page.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
the proper references for LAN traffic and internet traffic.
Best regards,
Chris
A little ambiguity never hurt anyone.___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
-strict-aliasing by default [1], but there
is nothing wrong with using -O only. On most platforms, there isn't much
difference between -O and -O2, although -O2 does help more with the x86
architecture.
--
-Chuck
Hmm so using -O2 is bad in 5.4 and it should be -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing?
Chris
On 25/10/05, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 08:57:27PM +0100, Chris wrote:
On 22/10/05, Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dick hoogendijk wrote:
My make.conf contains (fbsd-5.4)
CFLAGS= -O -pipe
COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe
Are these settings
/src
# make buildworld
# cd /usr/src
# make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL
# make installkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL
# shutdown now
# fsck -p
# mount -u /
# mount -a -t ufs
# swapon -a
# cd /usr/src
# make installworld
# shutdown -r now
Done.
--
Best regards,
Chris
Nature always sides
or operating system
problem.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. :-(
this definetely needs to get fixed. i'll be happy to help someone more
experienced, of course.
regards,
martin
Show us what's in /boot/loader.conf
--
Best regards,
Chris
The more studying you did for the exam, the less sure
you are as to which answer they want
count and only be reset on
Sunday night at 12:00 midnight?
Thank you,
Chris Pratt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ad4s1a
Regards
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 22/11/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 05:49:12AM +, Chris wrote:
On a few occasions all different remote servers I have had nfs cause
servers to stop responding so I stopped using it all the servers were
either 6.0 release 6.1 release or 6-stable
On 23/11/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 05:25:21AM +, Chris wrote:
On 22/11/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 05:49:12AM +, Chris wrote:
On a few occasions all different remote servers I have had nfs cause
servers
locking up on me with
nfs/sshfs all inicdently use sis/fxp/rl no coincidence the only 2
servers that dont use these lan cards which are using dc/re work fine
with nfs.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On 23/11/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 04:38:48PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kris a development on this, someone else posted about a nfs problem
and reading his post some starkling point he made about network cards,
he
On 23/11/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 04:38:48PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kris a development on this, someone else posted about a nfs problem
and reading his post some starkling point he made about network cards,
he
On 07/12/06, Anish Mistry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 07 December 2006 13:36, Chris wrote:
On 23/11/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 04:38:48PM +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kris a development on this, someone
On 14/12/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 01:28:48AM +, Chris wrote:
It does make sense if thats the problem since the entire server even
locally stops working properly, and it always follows a unexpected
nfs/sshfs disconnection ie. network timeout.
I
On 14/12/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 01:28:48AM +, Chris wrote:
It does make sense if thats the problem since the entire server even
locally stops working properly, and it always follows a unexpected
nfs/sshfs disconnection ie. network timeout.
I
On 18/12/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:39:13AM +, Chris wrote:
On 14/12/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 01:28:48AM +, Chris wrote:
It does make sense if thats the problem since the entire server even
affecting nfs.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 19/12/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 08:20:21PM +, Chris wrote:
On 18/12/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:39:13AM +, Chris wrote:
On 14/12/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006
run backtrace
then dump the output to disk so people who have no local access can
get backtraces?
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it caused the smtp to completely backlog and
stopped emails arriving.
I downgraded back to 0.88.7 again and all is fine again.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any
remember that you may have counted wrong.
so now the latest version of the port has same cpu utilisation as 0.88.7?
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
on 0.90_3.
Any chance to update the port to use 0.90.1 ? It fixes a number of
bugs, one of which happens fairly often (bad directory perms after a db update)
---Mike
What configuration in exim is needed to make it use tcp instead of sockets?
thanks
Chris
the
'TCPSocket' and 'TCPAddr' settings so it looks like this:
#LocalSocket /var/run/clamav/clamd
TCPSocket 3310
TCPAddr 127.0.0.1
-pcf
many thanks seems to be working
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters)
0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k)
0/56/8704 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max)
0 requests for sfbufs denied
0 requests for sfbufs delayed
20233 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile
7740 calls to protocol drain routines
Chris
On 06/04/07, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, April 06, 2007 06:17:04 +0100 Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am seeing the no buffer space error on a machine running 6.2 STABLE
feb 24 code, the machine isn't using
On 06/04/07, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, April 06, 2007 06:17:04 +0100 Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am seeing the no buffer space error on a machine running 6.2 STABLE
feb 24 code, the machine isn't using
be a handy thing..
chris
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
while upgrading to 4.0-stable i typed "make buildworld"
and after a half hour or so got this error:
install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444
/usr/src/gnu/lib/libgmp/../../../contrib/libgmp/gmp.h /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include
cd /usr/src/secure/lib/libdes; /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make
]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
--
Chris Jackson
Network Adminstrator
class.com
"A man, a plan, a canal, panama."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
as CURRENT they wanted 5.3 to be a production release so
disabled some things such as the ULE scheduler to force it to be
stable and its turned out a bit messy. Has anyone else got comments
on my 4 main points?
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
)
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type fc52 flags 3 len 55028 max 1514)
It is still online tho.
Chris
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 16:29:23 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:40:48PM -0200, T?rgan Flores de Siqueira wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 03:01:49PM +
I have noticed issues with HZ=1000 on a celeron 2ghz and a AMD64
3.2ghz, both caused problems with glftpd app and I had to recompile
kernel back to default HZ=100 to fix, I have also noticed HZ=1000 add
latency on my celeron box.
Chris
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:00:09 -0800, Kevin Oberman [EMAIL
I hope your issue is solved I get the same on a rl0 and have had no response.
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:00:34 -0500, Jonathan Pater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed 5.3-STABLE a couple weeks back onto what is to become an
office mail server, and after cvsupping to RELENG_5, I began to notice
I made a post earlier in the month about my concerns with 5.3 and I
reffered to 2 of my servers having tcp lockups, but on the most
problematic service I made some changes to the kernel and so far it
has been running very good network wise.
9:26PM up 28 days, 1:01, 1 user, load averages: 0.16,
Hi I have noticed 2 issues the 2nd could be operator error from my side.
1 - When editing make.conf I enabled NO_BIND_MTREE= true,
but this breaks mergemaster and stops it running during mergemaster
-iv.
2 - This issue I have no idea what the fault is yet since I have no
console access,
As it says above mine is set to 1 the default, would setting it to 0
help with things like DDOS attacks because it is processing less and
what side affects if any could I expect from ignoring ip options?
thanks
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
Any chance of repeating here please?
Chris
On 4/21/05, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 10:53:04AM +0400, Eugene Mitrofanov wrote:
Hi list
I have 5.4-stable from 18 apr.
netstat -m prints some strange current mbufs number. any suggestions?
See the 5.3
:-)
Are there any finer details related to the four-way or larger-bug?
regards
Claus
___
Hi I am abit confused here, have seen a post from someone using
5.4-STABLE how is that possible if 5.4 isnt RELEASE yet, and good news
on the bug fix.
Chris
freebsd
Seems the 4+ cpu crash fix might have broken it at a guess since RC4
onwards it broke, I am interested in how this goes as I was planning
on upgrading a SMP box to 5.4 and ULE this month.
Have you guys tried this without SMP?
Chris
On 5/11/05, Marian Hettwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mi
Ok thanks I will stick to the old scheduler on my smp system then.
Chris
On 5/12/05, Steven Jurczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris wrote:
Seems the 4+ cpu crash fix might have broken it at a guess since RC4
onwards it broke, I am interested in how this goes as I was planning
on upgrading
!!!
_ ___ _
| _ \ |_ _| | | | | | | | |
| |_) | | | | | | | | | | |
| _ | | | | | | | | | |
| |_) | _| |_ | | | | |_| |_|
|/ |_| |__| |__| (_) (_)
Dear Paul ...
--
Best regards,
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
I also have the errors showing up in my periodic logs but they dont
seem to cause me actual network drops.
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type e14c flags 3 len 1722 max
1514)
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type 1 flags 3 len 36860 max
1514)
Chris
On 5/23/05, Jack Raats [EMAIL
I also have the errors showing up in my periodic logs but they dont
seem to cause me actual network drops.
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type e14c flags 3 len 1722 max
1514)
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type 1 flags 3 len 36860 max
1514)
Chris
On 5/23/05, Jack Raats [EMAIL
.
tcp sendspace 32768 or 65535 depending on ram in machine
tcp recvspace 65535
if you have network instability try disabling giant functions and
device polling as well, enable syncookies, drop syn+fin, drop all
uneeded traffic with ipfw, disable adaptive mutexes.
Chris
loader.conf and tried setting a
value and leaving it as auto, both of these changes fixed the download
speed issue but setting to 0 introduces the problem.
Has anyone else noticed this?
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
I use the athlon-xp switch on 3 boxes with no problems all of them running 5.3
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:00:04 +0100, Bartosz Fabianowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
I am still having the problems with instant reboots that I reported [1]
a couple of weeks ago. I have a bit more info now
+, Chris wrote:
Hi
After reading the release notes and upgrading my server's I had set
the following in my /boot/loader.conf.
kern.ipc.nmbclusters=0
This is supposed to make the limit to unlimited as I understood from
the docs, but a user on one of my server's reported slow
Hi, I have a dual athlon mp system running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2, I
have wondered if both cpu's should show in top.
Here is a snapshot of my top output.
last pid: 15520; load averages: 0.28, 0.09, 0.03up 7+23:21:08 23:05:33
153 processes: 2 running, 151 sleeping
CPU states: 0.2% user,
229M 25168K nanslp 0 1:10 0.00% 0.00% java
657 root80 2580K 1028K nanslp 1 0:57 0.00% 0.00% da-popb4sm
480 root 960 3160K 1548K select 0 0:55 0.00% 0.00% ntpd
439 root 960 7964K 6808K select 0 0:47 0.00% 0.00% dccifd
Chris
On Fri, 14 Jan
I have been compiling ports using -O2 since I started using FreeBSD
back in 2003 and only port that has had issues with this is lang/ezm3
in FreeBSD 5.2.1 it needed -O.
Chris
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:46:24 +0100, Matthias Buelow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 05:48 PM 17/01
Yep its fixed now I know, I was saying its the only time I have ever
had a problem, the problem no longer exists now tho.
Chris
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:56:33 -0800 (PST), John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 18-Jan-2005 Chris wrote:
I have been compiling ports using -O2 since I started
what does -fno-strict-alias do? I cannot find it in man gcc
Chris
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:54:05 +, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep its fixed now I know, I was saying its the only time I have ever
had a problem, the problem no longer exists now tho.
Chris
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08
I apologise I have yet to test the patch, but will try and do so as
soon as possible by the end of the weekend.
Chris
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:52:19 -0500, Bosko Milekic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you please give an update?
-Bosko
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 08:43:53PM +, Chris wrote
is stable.
4:48AM up 4 days, 26 mins, 2 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00
5.3-RELEASE-p5
Chris
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:26:42 +0300, Artem Kuchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005, Artem Kuchin wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005, Artem Kuchin wrote:
I cvssed just an hour ago
in the next patch level back to 3.3.6.
Chris
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 02:48:01 -0800 (PST), Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
There seems to be a bug with the gcc version of 5.3
STABLE (gcc 3.4.2), when using:
#define _GLIBCXX_DEBUG
#define _GLIBCXX_DEBUG_PEDANTIC
I discovered
version then
what is bundled in 5.3 and I will report back. I havent test ezbounce
with 3.3.6 yet.
Chris
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 21:06:26 +0100, Björn König [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris schrieb:
there is also a bug which prevents compiling of ezbounce and psybnc, I
wonder how much testing went
I am talking about the psybnc source because its for users on the
server who cannot compile software from ports.
Chris
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:03:05 -0800 (PST), Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 02:48:01AM -0800, Rob wrote
Changing this so it affects 5-STABLE is suicide it will annoy a lot of
user's and draw people away from FreeBSD to other platforms, I dont
see any benefit from doing this the symlinks have caused me no ill
effect whatsoever
Chris
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 22:51:37 -0700, Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED
I mean them downloading from the psybnc website and installing from
that tarball, I guess an option I can provide is to compile from ports
and make some sort of script to install the binaries to the user's
dir.
Chris
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 21:10:53 +1300, Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
of tests you want doing.
Chris
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 22:15:09 -0500, Bosko Milekic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you please give an update?
-Bosko
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 08:43:10PM +, Chris wrote:
I apologise I have yet to test the patch, but will try and do so as
soon as possible
Have tested on 3 boxes.
5.3-STABLE compiled Jan 5th
--- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
61 packets transmitted, 61 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.062/0.073/0.146/0.013 ms
5.3-STABLE amd64 build compiled Jan 29th
--- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
60 packets
-- Forwarded message --
From: Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 05:16:00 +
Subject: Re: mbufs on 5.3-STABLE possible bug
To: Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
0 is supposed to mean unlimited, whilst leaving it blank(commented
out) is auto. Or at least the docs say
works, I have worked out
when this happens doing a new command and then trying again makes it
work. Any idea what could cause this?
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 305232 Feb 3 19:43 /usr/bin/make
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Thats a simple answer your HD is failing purchase a new one backup and
reinstall freebsd on new drive
Hi all!
Once i installed ``old'' FreeBSD 5.0-STABLE with UFS file system.
It had been working fine for a while without any problems but sometime
later; it showed error messages on ttyv0; each
You can umount any fs as long as it is not /usr or / boot into single user
mode and then use fdisk.
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 09:11, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
So, does anyone know the trick to be used to modify
the slices on a mounted disk ? Or do i have to boot
from a different media ?
man 4
,
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why would you want to do that ?
Just curious if I should even bother trying to compile 4.11's kernel
under Release 6.
Just tried and couldn't successfully 'config MYKERNEL_CONF':
[EMAIL PROTECTED] config MIRALINK.serial_console
config: ../compile/MIRALINK.serial_console: No such file or
Tell you how to unsubscribe
you need to send a email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please take off this mailing list at once!!! I dunno what this is all
about but i do not wish to receive any more mails, hundreds of them every
day, that makes no sense whatsoever to me.
Thank
problems will be resolved when 6.1 is released.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
acpi will work on 5.4 is this to do with i386 support been
removed or are there other acpi changes under the hood?
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On 09/02/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 04:40:46AM +, Chris wrote:
On 07/02/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 05:17:45PM -0800, Jon Holstrom wrote:
i cvsuped for 5.4 stable a few days ago.
server gave me 5.5
Hello,
You should try Xinetd as it has more options to help with this. I beleive
you SSH problem is due to a DNS/RDNS problem.
Regards,
Chris
Just a thought, wouldn't this open a new possibility for denial of
service attacks?
I doubt it. I'm guessing you're thinking of an attack where
if there have
been any
issues with the source that I should know about before I take the plunge.
Thank you for all your time and consideration.
--Chris
This message was brought to you by
the H.R. Communications Corp.,
Webmail
Greetings,
Here's a dmesg (see attached).
Thanks.
--Chris
Quoting Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At 05:14 PM 24/02/2006, Chris wrote:
Greetings,
I synced up both my source and ports trees 4 days ago and as I haven't
built a kernel for about 5mos. coupled with the security issues that have
Greetings,
My mailer blew the last posting.
Here's another attempt at posting the dmesg...
Quoting Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At 05:14 PM 24/02/2006, Chris wrote:
Greetings,
I synced up both my source and ports trees 4 days ago and as I haven't
built a kernel for about 5mos. coupled
with the following error:
:61041): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_text_width: assertion `font != NULL' failed
this message is repeated many times over.
Any relation to the xfontsel errors?
Thank you for all your time and consideration.
--Chris
uname -a
FreeBSD mail.1command.com 5.5-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 5.5
of anger or malice. I just felt the need to
skeak my 2¢ worth. :)
Best wishes.
--Chris
with kind regards
jonathan
--
powered by ..
QNX, OS9 and freeBSD -- http://caamora com au/operating system
=== appropriate solution
and consideration.
--Chris
--
Microsoft:
Disc space -- the final frontier!
FreeBSD 5.5-PRERELEASE (SMP) MAIL04 Fri Feb 24 16:59:38 PST 2006
for your help.
--Chris
Quoting Bartosz Fabianowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
resulted in a quite broken (and *un*stable) 5.5-PRERELEASE
RELENG_5 is 5.x-STABLE *most* of the time. When a release is nearing,
the first few steps of preparation happen directly on the stable
branch, so it will become 5.y
Hello and thank you for your response.
Quoting Robert Joosten [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Chris
I *thought* I was chasing 5-STABLE using the stable-src-supfile and
issuing the following:
cvsup -g -L 2 stable-src-supfile
with these settings in place:
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5
*default
As suspected. Perfect. Just what I was hoping. Thank you *very* much
for all your time and attention.
Best wishes.
--Chris
--
Microsoft:
Disc space -- the final frontier!
FreeBSD 5.5-PRERELEASE (SMP) MAIL04 Fri Feb 24 16:59:38
.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 09/03/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 05:43:10PM +, Chris wrote:
Hi
I recently noticed after the libtool bump using libthr on 5.3 and 5.4
What does libtool have to do with it?
release servers for mysql causes the process to hang when a kill
On 10/03/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 01:50:36AM +, Chris wrote:
On 09/03/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 05:43:10PM +, Chris wrote:
Hi
I recently noticed after the libtool bump using libthr on 5.3
On 11/03/06, Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:19:54AM +, Chris wrote:
I wasn't aware ports removed support right away tho so thank you for
clarifying that for me.
There is not enough FTP space for packages corresponding to every
port, for every release
and resolve
problems but diffilcult with no log entries.
Thanks
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Matt Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Will this also transfer the filesystem structure?
Indeed. The man pages for these commands will provide variations
of their usage. So as to obtain different results. Dependant upon your
needs.
--Chris
Matt
1 - 100 of 999 matches
Mail list logo
