On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 08:30:29AM +0100, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
On a more whislist topic: I'd really appreciate if .zfs dirs would be
excluded from the tarballs.
Hmm, I didn't realize this was happening.
So I can verify my change works for all environments, are you using any
local zfs
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 02:11:05AM +, Ben Morrow wrote:
Probably the latter is the easier option. /usr is the right filesystem
to be storing this sort of thing on, so you want to
mv /compat /usr
ln -s usr/compat /compat
The mv will take some time, since it is moving files
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 06:39:56PM +0400, S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
Hi list,
after the security announcement
(http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html) I use svn to
update my local ports tree. I've found out that the port index is
not updated. What is the preferred/recommended way to
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:26:51PM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
Do we have memstick.img snapshots for -CURRENT somewhere? Can only boot
via USB this time.
https://snapshots.glenbarber.us/Latest/
It is a few days behind though.
Glen
pgpql8OZjDAun.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:02:09AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:36:35AM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
https://snapshots.glenbarber.us/Latest/
It is a few days behind though.
I've tried 10.0 image from it; still getting (apparently the same) panic [1
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:07:47PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
They are included in the ISO.
Meh... I did not pay attention to the subject too closely, it seems.
If the memstick panics, I am not sure how much good the kernel symbols
will do for you. I cannot build them into the memstick
For those on -stable@ and -current@ not subscribed to -announce@:
Glen
- Forwarded message from Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org -
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:37:11 -0500
From: Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-annou...@freebsd.org
Subject: FreeBSD Development Snapshot Availability
I
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 03:07:46PM -0800, Chris H wrote:
Greetings,
I've used BSD exclusively since the early 80's, and this is my first
experience with a build(world|kernel) || install(world|kernel) fail.
That said, after installing from a 9.0 CD syncing src ports,
I began the process of
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:49:06AM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
(Not sure if this is the right mailing list, but here goes.)
-doc@ is a better choice.
Last night I did a csup to retrieve the whole cvs repository. I noticed
that huge numbers of files in doc and www have been
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 04:12:32PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
I think everyone agrees there is room for a svnup like program which
has a read-only svn mode to download and update sources with minimal
(zero?) dependencies.
That said, someone has to write it.
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 09:27:11PM -0600, John Mehr wrote:
All I have left at this point is to add support for
command line configuration options, add comments, tidy
everything up, get it to conform to the man style
guidelines and test it against a remote repository.
If you have code
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 06:28:02PM +0100, Rainer Duffner wrote:
I go from PERL 5.10 to PERL 5.16, for example and it complains that
perl5.16 conflicts with perl5.10...
This I needed, too:
pkg set -o long/perl5.10:lang/perl5.16
pkg remove perl
pkg set -o
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 05:23:14PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, February 21, 2013 4:56:02 pm Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On 22/02/2013, at 2:19, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
Does anyone have any hints?
Rather than using all these hints, just use these three in
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 05:41:17PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
So I have this VM which only has 256 MB of memory and 9.1-R installed.
I want to update it to RELENG_9, but buildworld swaps so bad it grinds
nearly to a halt. Even make -j1 -B runs into very heavy swapping. So
two questions:
The first BETA build of the 8.4-RELEASE release cycle is now available
on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, and pc98 architectures. The
SHA256/MD5 sums are tacked on to the bottom of this message. The ISO
images and, for architectures that support it, the memory stick images
are available
The first RC build of the 8.4-RELEASE release cycle is now available
on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, and pc98 architectures. The
SHA256/MD5 sums are tacked on to the bottom of this message. The ISO
images and, for architectures that support it, the memory stick images
are available here:
The second RC build of the 8.4-RELEASE release cycle is now available
on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, and pc98 architectures. The
SHA256/MD5 sums are tacked on to the bottom of this message. The ISO
images and, for architectures that support it, the memory stick images
are available
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 07:43:27PM -0400, Scott Reber wrote:
I'm using svnup to checkout stable/9 sources. How do I determine the svn
revision of those sources? I know that Head has included this in uname
-a, but I do not see this with stable/9 as of today.
You won't see the svn revision
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 05:00:04PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I'm not sure where this comes from during buildkernel, however. svn
info is the way I know of to get that value, but I don't know where in
the build framework it obtains this number.
svnversion is called in sys/conf/newvers.sh
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 09:15:34AM +0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
r249912, MFC r249802, is incomplete.
Please fix stable/9/lib/libc/gen/stringlist.c or amend
stable/9/include/stringlist.h. The latter is preferred.
I just fixed this.
Glen
pgphLhUnApKLw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
The third RC build of the 8.4-RELEASE release cycle is now available
on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, and pc98 architectures. The
SHA256/MD5 sums are tacked on to the bottom of this message. The ISO
images and, for architectures that support it, the memory stick images
are available here:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 10:57:44PM -0400, Michael L. Squires wrote:
I upgraded to FreeBSD 8.4-RC3 and noticed a problem with the fxp
driver on an older Supermicro single CPU single core Xeon
motherboard.
[...]
Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983,
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 09:50:18PM -0400, Michael L. Squires wrote:
I installed RELENG_8_4 using cvsup (yes, I'm planning on updating)
and got 8.4-BETA; this had the same behavior as 8-STABLE.
Right. releng/8.4 is not exported to cvsup. Please update your tree
with svn or svnup (net/svnup
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 06:09:43PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 08:18:33PM -0400, Michael L. Squires wrote:
I've just tested 8.4-RC3 using a different Supermicro 1U box with a fresh
installation of 8.4-RC3. I had problems with the installation, wouldn't
boot until
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 08:03:51PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 09:21:17PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 06:09:43PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 08:18:33PM -0400, Michael L. Squires wrote:
I've just tested 8.4-RC3
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 08:38:06PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
If someone wants me to test DHCP via fxp(4) on the above system (I can
do so with both NICs), just let me know; it should only take me half an
hour or so.
I'll politely wait for someone to say please do so else won't bother.
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 09:40:35PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
[...]
So if someone wants to take a stab at this, they'll need to do so and
make me an ISO. Sorry that I can't make things easier. :-(
This definitely needs to get fixed before 8.4-RELEASE.
*sigh*
At this point, it is
Speaking entirely on behalf of myself now...
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:11:39PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I think this will likely be included in errata notes for the release.
I urge you to meet with others in Release Engineering and discuss this
fully. This is major enough that, once
It was brought to our attention that this was not announced on -stable
before now. That is my fault.
This is a reminder that the Code Slush (aka Feature Freeze) for
9.2-RELEASE is in effect.
The Code Slush is different from the Code Freeze in that you do not need
to ask re@ permission for every
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 05:48:40AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 7/15/13 5:44 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 15.07.2013 08:38, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 13.07.2013 09:47, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Andre, we have a number of people running this patch in the
following configurations:
6-8GB
Hi John,
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 05:45:29PM -0700, John Reynolds wrote:
Hello all, I have some feedback for the recently prepared snapshot
of 9.2-RELEASE.
I've been trying like crazy to get the 9x series code installed on a
brand new workstation I'm building. It consists of a brand new
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 08:49:39PM -0700, John Reynolds wrote:
On 7/17/2013 5:48 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
Hi John,
Do you have a SATA drive you can try with this hardware? It would be
useful to know if that works, or same errors, etc.
Glen
I do, and that was my plan for tomorrow
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 08:48:28AM -0700, John Reynolds wrote:
On 7/18/2013 12:36 AM, Steven Hartland wrote:
Is the SSD running at 6Gbps? If so have you tried limiting the speed
to 3Gbps?
I would imagine so. It has a 6Gbps interface and the Z87 board does
also--so I can only imagine it's
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 01:28:10PM -0700, John Reynolds wrote:
On 7/18/2013 8:49 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 08:49:39PM -0700, John Reynolds wrote:
today. I will most definitely report back any findings. Thanks for
your reply!
John, in addition to suggestions/replies from
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 04:44:56PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to do a full (customised) release of 9.1 but I am
having trouble building the docs. If I use NODOC it builds fine,
but without that I get..
[...]
May I ask why 9.1?
Glen
pgpfrnmjTGwgQ.pgp
Description: PGP
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 05:19:23PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On 21/07/2013, at 16:19, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 04:44:56PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to do a full (customised) release of 9.1 but I am
having trouble building
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 07:55:03AM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On 21/07/2013, at 23:56, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
So, if I rebuild with 9.2 checked out will the docs build?
Yes.
Depending on the use, just downloading the built documents from
The first BETA build of the 9.2-RELEASE release cycle is now available
on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, and ia64 architectures.
The image checksums follow at the end of this email.
ISO images and, for architectures that support it, the memory stick images
are available here:
The second BETA build of the 9.2-RELEASE release cycle is now available
on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, powerpc64 and sparc64
architectures.
The image checksums follow at the end of this email.
ISO images and, for architectures that support it, the memory stick images
are available here:
The first release candidate builds of the 9.2-RELEASE release cycle
are now available on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc,
powerpc64, and sparc64 architectures.
The image checksums follow at the end of this email.
ISO images and, for architectures that support it, the memory
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 09:45:50AM -0400, Thomas Laus wrote:
I have been updating my FreeBSD systems for many years by updating and
building from source. For the FreeBSD 9.2 cycle, I decided to use
freebsd-update for binary update instead. I use Sendmail + Cyrus-SASL and
the
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 04:18:41PM +0200, CeDeROM wrote:
Hello :-)
I am installing the 9.2-RC1 bootonly iso which wants to download stuff from
snapshots while it is in releases directory:
Installer wants to get 9.2-RC1 stuff from here (where it is missing):
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 04:48:58PM +0200, CeDeROM wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 04:18:41PM +0200, CeDeROM wrote:
I am installing the 9.2-RC1 bootonly iso which wants to download stuff from
snapshots while it is in releases
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 07:28:01PM +0200, free...@omnilan.de wrote:
Hello,
I went through my local patches against base/releng/, 9.2 in that case.
There are some fixes which are noct in 9.2-RC1:
- Regarding kerberized builds:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:10:41AM -0500, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
NetBSD's makefs has a -Z flag to create the image as a sparse file. In
FreeBSD, the flag is spelled -p. Is there a reason for using a
different flag? It would be very nice to preserve CLI compatibility
with NetBSD.
NetBSD
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 09:33:01AM -0500, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
On 08/14/2013 09:06, Glen Barber wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:10:41AM -0500, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
NetBSD's makefs has a -Z flag to create the image as a sparse file. In
FreeBSD, the flag is spelled -p. Is there a reason
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 04:18:06PM -0500, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
Is there any chance this will be fixed in 9.2? It would be nice to
avoid introducing incompatibility in a release.
I will commit it in a few hours, with 3-day scheduled MFC. I will send
to RE for approval afterwards.
Glen
The second release candidate builds of the 9.2-RELEASE release cycle
are now available on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc,
powerpc64, and sparc64 architectures.
The image checksums follow at the end of this email.
ISO images and, for architectures that support it, the memory
The third release candidate builds of the 9.2-RELEASE release cycle
are now available on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc,
powerpc64, and sparc64 architectures.
This is expected to be the final release candidate for the 9.2-RELEASE
cycle.
The image checksums follow at the end
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 01:01:06PM -0700, Dave Hayes wrote:
I've been trying to get emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod to compile
from ports on a clang built 9-STABLE:
# uname -v
FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0 r251391M: Tue Jun 4 09:47:42 PDT 2013
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 02:16:39PM -0700, Dave Hayes wrote:
On 08/26/13 13:16, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 01:01:06PM -0700, Dave Hayes wrote:
I've been trying to get emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod to compile
from ports on a clang built 9-STABLE:
# uname -v
FreeBSD 9.1
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 08:10:31PM +0200, CeDeROM wrote:
Hello :-)
When installer is restarted DHCP fails to (re)configure interface,
probably because it is already configured :-) I got into this using
bootonly installer and machine with low capacity drive... Please fix
:-)
The fourth release candidate builds of the 9.2-RELEASE release cycle
are now available on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc,
powerpc64, and sparc64 architectures.
This is expected to be the final release candidate for the 9.2-RELEASE
cycle.
The image checksums follow at the end
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:13:10PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
Building up some servers with 9.1 (latest patch level), but want to
switch to 9.2 ASAP if it is solid. How goes the build? Remaining
TODOs? Estimated release date?
It should be done within the week. We're finishing up the release
Please don't use subject lines like that for broken links...
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:00:14AM -0700, Chris H wrote:
Greetings,
I was performing a ports search, and noticed that all the links
providing more information about each port goes to the FreeBSD
404 page. For example,
The first BETA build of the 10.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available
on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, powerpc64 and
sparc64 architectures.
The image checksums follow at the end of this email.
ISO images and, for architectures that support it, the memory stick images
are
It has become apparent that issues reported in PR 195458 [1] do not
apply to freebsd-update(8) users alone, and that the deadlock on reboot
(either via reboot(8) or shutdown(8) with the '-r' flag) can be reliably
reproduced under certain conditions.
Specifically, the issue can be reliably
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 06:59:51PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 03:43:25PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 06:33:00PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:10:37PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 06:33:00PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:10:37PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 03:07:06PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:55:59AM +, Glen Barber wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 02:13:34PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
How to enable bsdinstall support for multiple kernels?
I am do release with KERNEL=GENERIC VSTREAM
On install media I see:
total 361273
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel812 Apr 22 13:03 MANIFEST
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 02:28:22PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:18:44AM +, Glen Barber wrote:
bsdinstall don't ask about kernel.VSTREAM and don't install
kernel.VSTREAM.
What I miss?
Currently, the installer only installs GENERIC.
I have
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 03:07:06PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:55:59AM +, Glen Barber wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 02:28:22PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:18:44AM +, Glen Barber wrote:
bsdinstall don't ask about
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:44:44PM -0700, Nick Rogers wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Nick Rogers ncrog...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone working on fixing this problem? It seems like this should have
some kind of full court press as it is obviously affecting plenty of
people, some of
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 02:32:47PM -0700, Nick Rogers wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:44:44PM -0700, Nick Rogers wrote:
In case anyone is still dealing with this problem, the fix was MFC'd to
stable/10 a few days. I am
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 01:43:40PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:18:44AM +, Glen Barber wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 02:13:34PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
How to enable bsdinstall support for multiple kernels?
I am do release with KERNEL=GENERIC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
[-stable@ in CC since these are the first 10.2-PRERELEASE builds
available since the code slush went into effect, which marks the start
of the release cycle.]
New FreeBSD development branch installation ISOs and virtual machine
disk images have
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 08:15:41AM -0400, Kurt Lidl wrote:
On 6/30/15 10:54 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
Kurt, could you please create a PR and point me to the PR number so RE
can put it on our watch list?
The PR is: 201245
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201245
I put
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:48:56PM -0400, Chris Ross wrote:
On Jun 30, 2015, at 22:36 , Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:27:21PM -0400, Chris Ross wrote:
Yeah, this is the same panic you, I, and others have been seeing on
sparc64's
with bge's
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 08:14:07PM -0400, Kurt Lidl wrote:
[-stable@ in CC since these are the first 10.2-PRERELEASE builds
available since the code slush went into effect, which marks the start
of the release cycle.]
New FreeBSD development branch installation ISOs and virtual machine
disk
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:14:19PM -0400, Kurt Lidl wrote:
On 6/30/15 8:16 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 08:14:07PM -0400, Kurt Lidl wrote:
[-stable@ in CC since these are the first 10.2-PRERELEASE builds
available since the code slush went into effect, which marks the start
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:27:21PM -0400, Chris Ross wrote:
Yeah, this is the same panic you, I, and others have been seeing on
sparc64's
with bge's, or at least v240's (and one other IIRC) for many many months.
Thanks
for grabbing a core!
When I was trying to search for a commit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
[-stable@ in CC again.]
New FreeBSD development branch installation ISOs and virtual machine
disk images have been uploaded to the FTP mirrors.
As with any development branch, the installation snapshots are not
intended for use on production
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 10:52:00AM -0400, Kurt Lidl wrote:
Kurt, can you re-enable the ipv6 line in rc.conf(5), and add '-tso6' to
your rc.conf(5) lines?
ifconfig_bge0=DHCP
ifconfig_bge0_ipv6=inet6 accept_rtadv -tso6
I tried this, and it panic'd in the same manner. (Note - I've
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 08:50:13AM +0300, Johannes Jost Meixner wrote:
Hi Glen,
Here's the PR you asked for:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
I've discussed the merge with dchagin@, and he couldn't do it between
code slush and code freeze because on his weekends
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
New FreeBSD development branch installation ISOs and virtual machine
disk images have been uploaded to the FTP mirrors.
As with any development branch, the installation snapshots are not
intended for use on production systems. We do, however,
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 05:56:48PM -0400, Kurt Lidl wrote:
On 7/1/15 11:52 AM, Chris Ross wrote:
On Jul 1, 2015, at 11:34, Kurt Lidl l...@pix.net wrote:
I discovered that if I comment out the following lines
from my /etc/rc.conf, the machine boots reliably:
ifconfig_bge0=DHCP
For those not subscribed to svn commit email, the code freeze for the
upcoming 10.2-RELEASE is now in effect.
The full schedule as it stands now is available here:
https://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/10.2R/schedule.html
If you are aware of an issue that affects stable/10 that does not have
a
Hopefully the final status update before the final release announcement.
As of r28, releng/10.2 has been renamed to reflect -RELEASE status,
and the 10.2-RELEASE builds have been started (a bit earlier than the
original schedule planned).
Please keep in mind, the release is not final until
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 01:09:31PM -0500, dweimer wrote:
I was reading through the Release notes, and decided to enable
net.inet.tcp.pmtud_blackhole_detection in my test environment. It appears
that the monitoring tunable net.inet.tcp.pmtud_blackhole_min_activated is
incorrectly listed. Using
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 03:41:21PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
On 08/12/15 15:15, Glen Barber wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 01:09:31PM -0500, dweimer wrote:
I was reading through the Release notes, and decided to enable
net.inet.tcp.pmtud_blackhole_detection in my test environment
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 04:04:54AM +, jenkins-ad...@freebsd.org wrote:
FreeBSD_stable_10 - Build #1616 - Failure:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_stable_10/1616/
Full change log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_stable_10/1616/changes
Full build log:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 06:50:22PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 07:16:03PM +0200, Christian Kratzer wrote:
Hi,
I have been trying to update several of my FreeBSD 10.1 amd64 VM to
10.2-RELEASE with freebsd-update and have been failing with an incorrect
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 01:09:05AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 09:45:28PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:42:12AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 02:27:50AM +, Glen Barber wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 09:20:49AM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
prior to the releng/10.2 branch), please exercise caution when upgrading
to the latest stable/10 or releng/10.2 if your storage controller
matches any of the following PCI device IDs:
Which field of pciconf -lvb or sysctl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
The second RC build of the 10.2-RELEASE release cycle is now available.
Installation images are available for:
o amd64 GENERIC
o i386 GENERIC
o ia64 GENERIC
o powerpc GENERIC
o powerpc64 GENERIC64
o sparc64 GENERIC
The image checksums follow at
The 10.2-RC2 builds will begin in just under 5 hours.
At this time, re@ is no longer accepting commit request approvals to the
releng/10.2 branch, however a last-minute issue was discovered with the
pms(4) driver for PMC Sierra SAS/SATA HBA cards that is currently being
investigated.
It is
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:48:32AM +, Glen Barber wrote:
The new driver for PMC Sierra SAS/SATA HBAs does not properly validate
that both the vendor ID and device ID of some storage device drivers.
At present, we know there is a conflict with ahd(4), it is possible
there are more
The new driver for PMC Sierra SAS/SATA HBAs does not properly validate
that both the vendor ID and device ID of some storage device drivers.
At present, we know there is a conflict with ahd(4), it is possible
there are more.
The issue was reported on the -current@ mailing list in this thread:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 01:33:24AM +, Glen Barber wrote:
As noted in the previous heads-up email, we will have 10.2-RC3 as part
of this release cycle. The 10.2-RC3 builds will begin in just under 22
hours.
Sigh. I've clearly lost all track of what day of the week it is...
[...]
RC3
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 04:41:40PM -0300, Marcelo Gondim wrote:
I found the following problem with the pw:
FreeBSD srv.teste.com.br 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #14 r276979: Wed
Jan 21 11:50:11 BRST 2015 r...@srv.teste.com.br:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TESTE
amd64
# pw useradd foo
# pw
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 05:09:49PM -0300, Marcelo Gondim wrote:
On 05-08-2015 16:53, Glen Barber wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 04:41:40PM -0300, Marcelo Gondim wrote:
I found the following problem with the pw:
FreeBSD srv.teste.com.br 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #14 r276979: Wed
Jan 21
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:42:12AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 02:27:50AM +, Glen Barber wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 06:36:32PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 08:25:55AM -0700, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
The third RC build of the 10.2-RELEASE release cycle is now available.
This is expected to be the final RC build of this release cycle.
Installation images are available for:
o amd64 GENERIC
o i386 GENERIC
o ia64 GENERIC
o powerpc GENERIC
o
Now that I'm fairly certain I have the day of the week straightened out,
let's try this again...
10.2-RC3 builds will begin in just under 20 hours.
At this time, re@ is not accepting commit approval requests for the
releng/10.2 branch, and all known critical issues we are aware of at
this time
On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 10:47:09AM +0900, Daisuke Aoyama wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem with build kernel.
You cannot use device qlxgbe in kernel config.
I don't check but 11-current have same problem.
It is caused by r284982 and r284741.
New files were added but static files were not
As noted in the previous heads-up email, we will have 10.2-RC3 as part
of this release cycle. The 10.2-RC3 builds will begin in just under 22
hours.
At this time, re@ is not accepting commit request approvals for the
releng/10.2 branch, and all known critical issues we are aware of at
this time
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:14:54PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
On 27/07/2015 04:39, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
* Separated email services (and single-point-of-failure cases) from
the machine that has been handling this task for over 18 years, to
new, single-purpose service
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:32:34PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
On 27/07/2015 16:25, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:14:54PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
On 27/07/2015 04:39, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
* Separated email services (and single-point-of-failure cases) from
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 07:40:42PM -0400, Jason Unovitch wrote:
..uh top quoting..
Trying to mount root from zfs:zroot/ROOT/default [].
Fatal double fault:
eip = 0xc0b416f5
esp = 0xe2673000
ebp = 0xe2673008
cpuid =0; apic id = 00
panic: double fault
cpuid = 0
KDB stack
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:19:20AM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Glen Barber wrote:
ZFS on i386 requires KSTACK_PAGES=4 in the kernel configuration to work
properly, as noted in the 10.1-RELEASE errata (and release notes, if
I remember correctly).
We cannot set KSTACK_PAGES=4
101 - 200 of 387 matches
Mail list logo
