On Tuesday 15 August 2006 05:25, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
2006/8/14, John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Monday 14 August 2006 04:45, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
2006/8/13, Michael Landin Hostbaek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Arjan van Leeuwen (avleeuwen) writes:
I'm trying to boot FreeBSD
hint.pci3.13.INTA.irq=17
So I'm assuming this is a case of group-blindness :) s/hint/hw/
Heh.. Doh!
Thanks, I can now iozone the stripe with no obvious impact of Desktop
performance.
Previously even a 1MB/s single file copy would make the system virtually
unusable.
Cool!
--
John Baldwin
;
free(host);
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable
On Thursday 17 August 2006 04:20, Peter van Heusden wrote:
Thanks for the advice John. I upgraded to 6-STABLE and just got a kernel
panic again. Before I list the dump, I'd like to mention two messages I
see in my syslog. Firstly, often I get something like this:
kernel: swap_pager
to the serial console. We could use -D though, that
would let the user break into the loader and adjust console (or use boot -h)
to force sysinstall to use the serial console.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Thursday 24 August 2006 15:42, Ceri Davies wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:20:47PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 24 August 2006 05:18, Ceri Davies wrote:
[ Forwarded from cvs-doc ]
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:37:19PM +, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
keramida2006-08
some
large directories.
Do you have a coredump? I assume you do from your debug output. Can
you download http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/gdb/gdb6, fire up kgdb, and
once in kgdb, do 'source /path/to/gdb6' and then run 'ps' and reply
with the output from that?
--
John Baldwin
depend make make install
but build fails at:
Use NO_AUDIT=yes in your build and see if that gives you a working sshd.
(i.e. make NO_AUDIT=yes depend make NO_AUDIT=yes
make NO_AUDIT=yes install)
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
On Saturday 16 September 2006 16:55, Frode Nordahl wrote:
On 16. sep. 2006, at 22.22, Frode Nordahl wrote:
On 16. sep. 2006, at 22.09, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday 16 September 2006 07:02, Frode Nordahl wrote:
Hello,
FreeBSD localhost.localdomain 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2
On Sunday 17 September 2006 02:05, Frode Nordahl wrote:
On 17. sep. 2006, at 04.42, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday 16 September 2006 16:55, Frode Nordahl wrote:
On 16. sep. 2006, at 22.22, Frode Nordahl wrote:
On 16. sep. 2006, at 22.09, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday 16 September
this on a system with
data you don't care about (i.e., it's ok to just do a reinstall if it is
hosed).
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
supposed to. It should not be necessary i.m.h.o.
Because other OS's run the BIOS in real mode, and we run it in vm86 mode and
we don't emulate enough instructions in vm86 mode for the Compaq/HP BIOS.
See my other e-mail.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd
. Short of that, you can edit sys/dev/smbus/smb.c and add a
printf to smb_identify() and make sure it is called.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 14:44, John Baldwin wrote:
jhb 2006-09-26 18:44:57 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
sys/dev/smbussmbus.c
Log:
MFC: Add an explicit bus_add_child method for smbus(4).
Approved by:re
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 15:10, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
Hello!
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, John Baldwin wrote:
It still works here. Since you are using modules, make sure all your
modules
are in sync. Short of that, you can edit sys/dev/smbus/smb.c and add a
Yes, they are (I've
of these have given
me any luck.
So, with that in mind... Anyone have any ideas on how I can get this to
recognize the 6gb of memory we have installed on the motherboard?
- Greg
RELENG_6 allows for more holes. Please try that out.
--
John Baldwin
with an SMP
kernel. No need to recompile.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
have
died before last week though; but that is the probable time) So this
weekend I set out to find out why.
It is a known problem that I caused. We are working on it. If you
want to, you can try this patch. It should fix your problem.
John
--
John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED
was
experiencing, and I can see the dancing Kame again now.
Cheers,
Matthew
Can you please try this patch too? The previous one I gave you, still
have some unwanted side effect. This one is by JINMEI, Tatuya and
seems to be without any... As far as I could test.
Thanks.
John
and
want to test on RELENG_6, you can just ignore that part of the patch. Please
test, thanks.
http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/smbus_locking.patch
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
for its name. A * means
there are 2 or more devices on this IRQ and there wasn't enough room for
their names.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send
.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 15:00, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:53:26 -0400
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/smbus_locking.patch
Hmm, I have a Nforce4-based maonboard, and went looking for nfsmb, but
I can't find it anywhere
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 15:48, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:47:35PM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
Hi John,
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 03:00:40PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 12:55, Norbert Augenstein wrote:
Hi list,
i have just
subvendor=0x103c
subdevice=0x1654 class=0x02
dev.bge.0.%parent: pci4
Is there any other information I ought to post to help with diagnosis -
or is this a known problem? (I've only subscribed recently)
John Marshall.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
(bge) not the PCI cards (fxp).
Since I don't think there's anything else useful I can add to that
discussion, I'll just revert to exclusive use of SCHED_4BSD, sit back
and keep reading.
Thanks.
John Marshall.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
stretch of the imagination. It
only manages the power button. :) It doesn't enumerate devices like fdc0.
4.x only uses PNPBIOS and kernel config for that.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
the manpages and the acpi@ list for more
info on doing that.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
people go looking they don't
waste time (and potentially quite a bit of money) buying something that
doesn't function.
While you certainly aren't having a good experience, there are counter-examples,
so I don't think you can claim that the hardware is completely unsupported.
--
John Baldwin
down?
Well, first let's see which driver it is. :) You might be able to just
remove the DELAY and add a printf and see which device is printed last.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 13:31, Joe Altman wrote:
to update world...I was it was recently committed, and ran an update
at approximately 10 AM EDT.
Here is where 'make buildworld' stopped:
The fix hasn't been committed yet.
--
John Baldwin
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 13:20, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
John Baldwin writes:
| On Tuesday 10 October 2006 08:54, Bill Moran wrote:
| In response to Doug Ambrisko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| Bruno Ducrot writes:
| | On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:07:12PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
| | In response
On Thursday 19 October 2006 06:04, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 10:01:45AM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
6.2-PRERELEASE from 20061016 RELENG_6 sources.
Locked vnodes
0xc6b7bdd0: tag nfs, type VDIR
usecount 2, writecount 0, refcount 8 mountedhere 0
flags
if the IDT is statically
allocated in BTX (if so, it might result in a space problem), however
reusing the BIOS IDT offsets would be preferable to re-programming the
PICs on every mode switch.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Friday 20 October 2006 12:05, John E Hein wrote:
John Baldwin wrote at 10:44 -0400 on Oct 19, 2006:
On Thursday 19 October 2006 06:04, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 10:01:45AM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
6.2-PRERELEASE from 20061016 RELENG_6 sources.
Locked
to fix. It can
just be backed out for now. What it really should do for the load address is
addr - KERNBASE + KERNLOAD. But KERNBASE and KERNLOAD aren't fixed values.
I should look at how loader does it.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
.
If the machine has enough physical memory, e.g. 4G, then it works (I
think that was the case on the machine John tested this change), but
on my test machine I only have 3G of memory, so it fails.
Actually, it should never work, as the kernel assumes it is loaded at
KERNLOAD.
My interim solution
On Thursday 26 October 2006 10:42, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:28:09AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 26 October 2006 10:18, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:52:30PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
3
On Thursday 26 October 2006 15:18, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:38:24AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 26 October 2006 10:42, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:28:09AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
boot2 should do whatever loader does
I am currently running FreeBSD 5.4 STABLE built from latest sources
downloaded last night. Previously i had run 5.4RELEASE and kismet with
no problem. But after the move to STABLE kismet will compile cleanly but
looks like it doesnt build the radiotap_bsd_x sources.
The radiotap headers exist
in
On Tuesday 05 July 2005 06:38 pm, Anders Nordby wrote:
Hi John,
From my console:
FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p2 #2: Wed Jul 6 00:01:31 CEST 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MASTER
Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 248 (2193.76-MHz K8
provide some things needed for an amd64
driver to be feasible.
--
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
Power Users Use the Power to Serve = http://www.FreeBSD.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Is there anyone who has el(4) hardware that can test some patches for adding
MPSAFE locking in current? Thanks.
--
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
Power Users Use the Power to Serve = http://www.FreeBSD.org
in such a way that they don't update their stats is
all. It's not an indication of any other issues, it's simply an accounting
error in that one edge case. I can look into fixing it but since it's just
cosmetic, it's fairly low on the priority list.
--
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]http
On Friday 12 August 2005 10:26 am, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Friday, 12. August 2005 15:43, John Baldwin wrote:
[ Grrr, stupid kmail smart quoting always screws up formatted output,
wish I could turn it off ]
Actually you can: Settings/Configure Kmail/Composer, on the General tab. I
of the addresses for eip, etc.
--
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
Power Users Use the Power to Serve = http://www.FreeBSD.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
On Friday 19 August 2005 05:33 pm, Anders Nordby wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:10:27AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
(Sun V20z server booting and crashing with SMP kernel and acpi on)..
ACPI APIC Table: PTLTD APIC
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs
cpu0
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 09:34 am, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 17. August 2005 21:29 CEST schrieb John Baldwin:
On Wednesday 17 August 2005 10:43 am, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
Am Dienstag, 16. August 2005 19:52 CEST schrieb Brooks Davis:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:05:08PM +0200
Is there anyone with an ste(4) ethernet adapter? I have some fixes to the
locking for HEAD so that it runs without Giant and no one has stepped up to
test them. If no one has the hardware and is willing to test the patches
then I'll remove the driver from HEAD in a few weeks.
--
John
On Friday 26 August 2005 10:14 am, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:46:49 -0400 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about Anyone with an ste(4) card?:
JB Is there anyone with an ste(4) ethernet adapter? I have some fixes to
I have several of D-Link 550TX working here...
JB
On Friday 26 August 2005 10:06 am, Bob Bishop wrote:
Hi,
At 14:46 26/08/2005, John Baldwin wrote:
Is there anyone with an ste(4) ethernet adapter? I have some fixes to the
locking for HEAD so that it runs without Giant and no one has stepped up
to test them. If no one has the hardware
Should it be possible to compile and run MySQL 4.1 with GCC 3.4 on a FreeBSD
4.11 machine?
I have a server which, for the time being at least, cannot be updated to
FreeBSD 5. I'm currently running the stock MySQL 4.1.14 compiled from the
port with no make flags.
I would like to experiment
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 14:41, Alex Dupre wrote:
John Nielsen wrote:
I would like to experiment with different build options/flags in the
hopes of boosting performance. Specifically, I'd like to build it with
linuxthreads and optimized C flags, but I am wary of using -O3 with gcc
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 04:53 pm, Hector Lecuanda wrote:
On 9/20/05, John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 01:55 pm, Hector Lecuanda wrote:
I have an Intel 82573 1000/PRO nic. I've seen that the 4.x branch
supports this device, but 5.x does
Is there anyone out there with a wb(4) or txp(4) card that can test patches to
fixup the locking and make them MPSAFE? The patches should apply to both
HEAD and RELENG_6. Thanks!
--
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
Power Users Use the Power to Serve = http
,
though there has been at least some minimal interest in at least two of those
(though no one has tested anything yet on all 3).
--
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
Power Users Use the Power to Serve = http://www.FreeBSD.org
under 5.4 without issues.
What works for you?
John
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFDR2FnaVyA7PElsKkRA+IaAJ9o1AleKkLm/3Dlu+tQtu970bSvOgCfXaFb
zKoGLZlkGFl2UgB5/UjZB3g=
=Si7v
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd
as a new alias for 'trace' which should make
some gdb-using folks lives easier if they are used to using 'bt' in gdb all
the time.
--
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
Power Users Use the Power to Serve = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Carl Makin wrote:
Morning All,
I've been having a heap of trouble with the primary network interface
on a box that was running 5.4 and recently upgraded to 6.0-Beta5 where
the interface would just go dead. Nothing in ifconfig or syslog or
dmesg would indicate a problem, but nothing would
Carl Makin wrote:
John Pettitt wrote:
Carl Makin wrote:
Morning All,
the interface would just go dead. Nothing in ifconfig or syslog or
dmesg would indicate a problem, but nothing would go in or out. The
only way to fix it was reboot.
What sort of network card? I've been
On Thursday 03 November 2005 09:03 am, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:27:21PM +, Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, dick hoogendijk wrote:
Sure, but I think it's the *syntax* that matters here? options -
nooptions / i486_cpu - no??? It's OK to leave GENERIC
The patch below adds locking to the lge(4) driver and marks it MPSAFE. If you
have lge(4) hardware and are running 6.0 or later, please test. Thanks!
http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/lge_locking.patch
--
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
Power Users Use
won't help.
http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/nve_locking.patch
--
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
Power Users Use the Power to Serve = http://www.FreeBSD.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
After successfully installing FreeBSD 6.0 on a Compaq TC1000 Tablet PC (and
updating it to yesterday's -STABLE), I am trying to get the built-in wireless
to work. The wi(4) driver does not attach to it. Under Windows, the card
shows up as a Compaq 802.11b WLAN Mini-PCI card (although it is
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 06:03 pm, Milan Obuch wrote:
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 21:39, John Nielsen wrote:
After successfully installing FreeBSD 6.0 on a Compaq TC1000 Tablet PC
By the way, how did you install 6.0 there? I am working with TC1000 too,
but it looks almost impossible
.
+At runtime the 'H' key will toggle this mode. The default is ON.
.SH DESCRIPTION OF MEMORY
Mem: 9220K Active, 1032K Inact, 3284K Wired, 1MB Cache, 2M Buf, 1320K Free
The manpage is correct. The problem is that kernel threads such as ithreads
are really kernel processes currently.
--
John Baldwin
to hide the race. :(
--
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
Power Users Use the Power to Serve = http://www.FreeBSD.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 02:47 am, Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote:
On Friday 02 December 2005 14.54, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday 02 December 2005 05:00 am, Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote:
I have the following panic occurring several times a week. The machine
is an NFS server, and it usually
= 'E8500 XMB A/B/C/D Identification Registers'
class = memory
subclass = RAM
These types of devices don't need a driver to work.
--
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
Power Users Use the Power to Serve = http://www.FreeBSD.org
place: i.e. a config file. If it really gets peoples
panties all up in wads we can move the defaults files to /sys/conf (e.g.
sys/conf/DEFAULTS.i386 or even sys/conf/defaults.i386).
--
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
Power Users Use the Power to Serve = http
On Thursday 26 October 2006 15:54, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 03:42:34PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 26 October 2006 15:18, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:38:24AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 26 October 2006 10:42, Ruslan Ermilov
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.18
+++ RWSRV05 2006/10/31 10:24:01 1.18
+# $Id: RWSRV05,v 1.18 2006/10/31 10:24:01 john Exp $
+optionsINVARIANT_SUPPORT
+optionsINVARIANTS
+optionsSMP # Symmetric MultiProcessor
Kernel
+#options SCHED_ULE # ULE
all those additional drivers into a 6.1 system, so that
might not be a fair comparison.)
John Marshall.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Marshall wrote:
I don't see this at all on 6.1 unless I use SCHED_ULE. (Although, I
haven't compiled all those additional drivers into a 6.1 system, so that
might not be a fair comparison.)
Wrong! I saw this last night for the first time on a production hp
ProLiant ML110 (6.1-RELEASE-p10
It looks like this one may have slipped through the cracks. I don't think
there's any reason not to include support for the SMC 2532W-B in -STABLE's
wi driver when all it needs is a reference to an existing definition. See
this thread:
to the UP/DOWN
storm (vmstat -i did not display an irq for em0 at that time).
When ioapic was disabled, all devices worked with shared irqs.
So, this is probably an ioapic's issue, not a mpt's, and PDSME
specific I guess. Sorry for the false alarm.
John, are there any big changes of ioapic
, or, in the case you
ran into, the thread does a PROC_UNLOCK() and calls mi_switch().
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
23:31:41 AST 2006
I'm going to build in DDB stuff right now, as I know I've seen that one
before
... but figured I'd ask and see if someone had an idea with so very little
information :(
ddb will give a lot more useful information, can't really debug it further w/o
that, sorry. :(
--
John
On Monday 11 December 2006 17:21, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
--On Monday, December 11, 2006 16:27:23 -0500 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Saturday 09 December 2006 03:30, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Without a core dump, does this mean anything to anyone?
Sleeping thread (tid
in consistent behavior?
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 15:47, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
--On Monday, December 11, 2006 17:40:22 -0500 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Maybe use ssh -e none? You don't need to break into ddb though, when it
panics it will print out more useful info on its own.
Ah, like
...
KDB_UNATTENDED should make it do a coredump and not bother with dropping into
ddb when it panics.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
.)
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Support for FreeBSD 4.11 is going to end sometime in late January. Originally,
FreeBSD 6.2 was supposed to be released back in October. This would have given
everyone about 3 months to stress test everything and migrate all their boxes
from 4.11 direct to 6.2. Now it is near the end of
I tried to grow a 600GB filesystem to 1TB and growfs barfed complaining
about a negative block number - this was a raid array (highpoint) that
looks like one drive (da0) to the system. Does growfs actually work -
google searches were not much help ...
John
On Friday 29 December 2006 02:39, John Pettitt wrote:
I tried to grow a 600GB filesystem to 1TB and growfs barfed complaining
about a negative block number - this was a raid array (highpoint) that
looks like one drive (da0) to the system. Does growfs actually work -
google searches were
-tcp_pcb_fix.diff
Sorry, it was lost in the noise as we have lots of other local changes to
tcp_subr.c at work so I missed this hunk. :(
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
rxidx' as well
as 'p sc-bge_cdata.bge_rx_std_chain[rxidx]' and 'p
sc-bge_cdata.bge_rx_jumbo_chain[rxidx]'? Also, are you using jumbo frames
at all?
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 12:53, Sven Willenberger wrote:
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 11:50 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 09:37, Sven Willenberger wrote:
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 12:50 +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Sven Willenberger wrote:
On Mon
need to put 'ddb' in your kernel and run 'show lapic' and 'show apic' and
provide a verbose dmesg.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
:
bus_alloc_resource_any(..., SYS_RES_MEMORY, ...)
bus_alloc_resource_any(..., SYS_RES_IRQ, ...)
bus_setup_intr(...)
make_dev(...)
Where if any step fails it undoes the previous steps and fails to attach.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable
for a couple years; it's not specific to 4.11
(versus 4.10 or 4.9).
Can you try a RELENG_4 kernel? I know of at least one fix (in
sys/i386/isa/clock.c) since 4.11 was released that might help you out.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
?
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 11 January 2007 16:13, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 01:40:48PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 10:36, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Yes, I know 4.11 is EOL'd at the end of this month, but hopefully
someone can shed some light on this problem
by the kernel driver.
To answer your question: you need to first make sure your SCSI BIOS is
registering your second disk with the BIOS. Assuming it's mapped as
drive 81, you can then use '1:da(1,a)'. If it shows up as drive 82, then
use 2:da(1,a)', etc.
--
John Baldwin
On Friday 12 January 2007 10:56, Jo Rhett wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
A BIOS driver number is the number you pass to the BIOS to access a drive.
Typically drive 0x0 is a floppy drive and hard drives start at 0x80.
Usually the SCSI BIOS will list the BIOS driver number during the POST
of story.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 12 January 2007 16:12, Jo Rhett wrote:
On Jan 12, 2007, at 10:12 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
Like I mentioned before, lsdev only showed me a single drive.
Then the 3ware BIOS doesn't let the boot software see your second
drive,
so there's no way to load /boot/loader off
On Monday 15 January 2007 19:42, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 09:03, Patrick Reich wrote:
Wishful thinking: Too bad there isn't an nvidia-driver-legacy port.
It wouldn't be too much work to split the current port into 3 separate ones
for this purpose.
Then you could
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 23:51, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 05:13:16AM +0100, Par Leijonhufvud wrote:
I have a FreeBSD box (running ancient 4.8) that used to collect email
fine with fetchmail. Then after te latest portupgrade of fetchmail it
stopped working. When trying
101 - 200 of 1661 matches
Mail list logo
