On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 11:55:26AM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
MGF 'b' stands for blocked, not busy. Judging by your page fault rate
MGF and the high number of frees and pages being scanned, you're probably
MGF swapping tasks in and out
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 02:57:27PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 11:55:26AM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
MGF 'b' stands for blocked, not busy. Judging by your page fault
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 09:52:03PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 02:57:27PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 11:55:26AM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Marc G. Fournier wrote
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 04:45:49PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 09:52:03PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 02:57:27PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Kostik Belousov wrote
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 02:17:20AM +0200, V??clav Haisman wrote:
V??clav Haisman wrote, On 29.5.2006 0:09:
See attached file. The kernel is todays CVS 6.1.
--
Vaclav Haisman
May 28 19:16:55
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 01:47:04AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
3416 1 1004100 ufs ?? DsJ0:13.01
/usr/local/libexec/postfix/master
3418 3416 1004100 ufs ?? DJ 0:04.16 qmgr -l -t fifo -u
33561 3416 1004100 ufs ?? DJ
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 08:15:35AM +0200, V??clav Haisman wrote:
Kostik Belousov wrote, On 26.6.2006 6:17:
Try manually MFC rev. 1.637 of sys/kern/vfs_subr.c.
Please, report the results (at least to me).
I have never done it manual patching before. Do you mean this
http
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 02:20:12AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Yes, this looks like a deadlock. As I understand, that's on 6.1-STABLE ?
Yes, kernel sources, it seems, from May 25th, according to my /usr/src
tree ...
BTW, do you use
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 12:44:17PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Just upgraded to June 15th sources, started up all the processes, and am
already at 29 blocked processes ...
I've checked for states D, E and L ... nothing ...
Actually,
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 06:23:15AM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
Rink Springer writes:
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
sys/nfsservernfs_serv.c nfs_srvsubs.c
Log:
MFC of the temporary fix for nfsd leaking GIANT.
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 01:38:54PM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
Kostik Belousov writes:
Approved by:pjd (mentor)
Revision ChangesPath
1.156.2.3 +16 -0 src/sys/nfsserver/nfs_serv.c
1.136.2.3 +4 -0 src/sys/nfsserver/nfs_srvsubs.c
The above files are what I
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:48:06PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 01:49:04PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:35:21PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 07:05:36AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
OK, please, provide also your fstab, information on md config
and dmesg, and kernel config. Also, it would be good to see the
output of alltrace in ddb. It seems that your kernel does not
contain quota option ?
Oh, I see, you
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:48:06PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 01:49:04PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:35:21PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 05:49:44PM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
User Freebsd writes:
Since there are several of us experiencing what looks to be the same sort
of deadlock issue, I beseech you not to give up
I will try to setup the environment, but to be honest no more 6.X for us
until
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 12:50:11AM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
Kostik Belousov writes:
Since nobody except you experience that problems (at least, only you
notified
about the problem existence)
Did you miss the part of:
User Freebsd writes:
Since there are several of us experiencing
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 10:06:52AM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jul 2006, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 12:50:11AM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
Kostik Belousov writes:
Since nobody except you experience that problems (at least, only you
notified
about
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 03:40:01PM -0700, Michael Collette wrote:
User Freebsd wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jul 2006, Francisco Reyes wrote:
John Hay writes:
I only started to see the lockd problems when upgrading the server side
to FreeBSD 6.x and later. I had various FreeBSD clients, between 4.x
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:09:24AM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
The most significant problem working with rpc.lockd is creating easy to
reproduce test cases. Not least because they can potentially involve
multiple clients. If you can help to produce simple test cases to
reproduce the bugs
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 02:38:22PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:09:24AM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
The most significant problem working with rpc.lockd is creating easy to
reproduce test cases. Not least because they can potentially involve
multiple clients
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 02:04:59PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Also, the both lockd processes now put identification information in the
proctitle (srv and kern). SIGUSR1 shall be sent to srv process.
Hmm, after looking at the dump
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 12:41:07AM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 10:56:47PM -0400 I heard the voice of
Charles Sprickman, and lo! it spake thus:
Trying again, it reported the same inconsistencies then sat there
for
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 01:39:01AM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 12:41:07AM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 10:56:47PM -0400 I heard the voice
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 05:41:16PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Sun, 2006-Jul-09 23:45:44 +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
+-Le 09/07/2006 17:36 -0400, Mike Jakubik a dit :
| Exactly, its nice being able to see the current values. How else can i
| see what the values are set to?
As I
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 12:10:29AM -0300, User Freebsd wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Robert Watson wrote:
If you can get into DDB when the hang has occurred, output via serial
console for the following commands would be very helpful:
show pcpu
show allpcpu
ps
trace
traceall
show
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 12:19:25PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 09:46:49AM +0100, Mark Knight wrote:
Index: mount.h
===
RCS file: /usr/local/arch/ncvs/src/sys/sys/mount.h,v
retrieving revision 1.210
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 09:46:49AM +0100, Mark Knight wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kostik
Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 09:32:47AM +0100, Mark Knight wrote:
Just awoke to fine my home server (6.1-RELEASE) had panicked during its
daily update of /usr/ports
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 09:32:47AM +0100, Mark Knight wrote:
Just awoke to fine my home server (6.1-RELEASE) had panicked during its
daily update of /usr/ports with an uptime of 49 days.
Stack trace is here:
http://www.knigma.org.uk/scratch/crash_160706.txt
Looks file system related
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 01:31:17AM -0300, User Freebsd wrote:
Kostik/Robert ... does this provide enough (any?) information concerning
the deadlock situation(s) that are being reported? is there anything else
I should do the next time it happens?
I tried to submit a GnATs report on this
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 07:51:52AM -0300, User Freebsd wrote:
'k, had a bunch of fun tonight, but one of the results is that I was able
to achieve file system deadlock, or so it appears ...
Using the following from DDB:
set $lines=0
show pcpu
show allpcpu
ps
trace
alltrace
show
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 11:23:21AM -0300, User Freebsd wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, User Freebsd wrote:
Also note that under FreeBSD 4.x, all three of these machines were pretty
much my more solid machines, with even more vServers running on them
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 05:51:01PM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
for(i = 0; i sizeof(buf); i++)
buf[i] = (char)toupper(buf[i]);
buf[i] = (char)toupper((unsigned char)buf[i]);
Standard integer promotion promotes KOI8-R char codes like 0xd4 into 0xffd4.
Since such
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 11:24:13AM +, Michael Abbott wrote:
I've been trying to make some sense of the NFS locking issue. I am
trying to run
# make installworld DESTDIR=/mnt
where /mnt is an NFS mount on a FreeBSD 4.11 server, but I am unable to
get past a call to `lockf`.
On
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 07:17:34PM +, Michael Abbott wrote:
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006, Kostik Belousov wrote:
For debugging purposes, tcpdump of the corresponding communications
would be quite useful. Besides this, output of ps auxww | grep 'rpc\.'
may be interesting.
Um. How interesting
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 09:48:48AM +, Michael Abbott wrote:
An alternative would be to update to RELENG_6 (or at least RELENG_6_1)
and then try again.
This machine is so painfully slow that I'll probably have to do that
overnight, and then I'm out of time until next weekend. Just
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:23:49PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Sep 22, 2006, at 4:36 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Start by enabling INVARIANTS, INVARIANT_SUPPORT, DEBUG_LOCKS and
DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS, then run 'show lockedvnods' and 'alltrace' in DDB
(spammy, need that serial console), or at least
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 09:56:54AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Oct 3, 2006, at 4:43 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Details are posted at http://vivek.khera.org/scratch/crashlogs/
I have the crashdumps available to a kernel hacker upon request (i'd
rather not make them generally available
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 01:06:37PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Oct 4, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
The only thing I think was running at the time would be a large file
copy from a remote system to this one using rsync.
As I understand, you got the panic. Then, you shall
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 05:16:53PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Oct 3, 2006, at 4:43 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Details are posted at http://vivek.khera.org/scratch/crashlogs/
I have the crashdumps available to a kernel hacker upon request (i'd
rather not make them generally available
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 10:01:07AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Oct 5, 2006, at 4:30 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
The network load was minimal at the time. I had everyone log out and
close mail etc.
What were the symptoms of locked system ? Could you log in on
console, or
do
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 02:11:05PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Oct 6, 2006, at 1:57 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
This is very strange. You 3 instances of getty where just reading the
tty input, and all suspectible processes (like sshd) are waiting
on net
events. No processes are blocked on
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 01:22:57PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
GCC would not fix the bug described in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29390
because the compiler is of an unsupported version (they only support 4.x now).
Yet, the problem is rather real and hits when the
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:36:42PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29390
четвер 12 жовтень 2006 05:54, Kostik Belousov написав:
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305
opt/gcc-3.4.6 is the stock version of the 3.4.6 built
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 10:01:45AM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
6.2-PRERELEASE from 20061016 RELENG_6 sources.
Locked vnodes
0xc6b7bdd0: tag nfs, type VDIR
usecount 2, writecount 0, refcount 8 mountedhere 0
flags (VV_ROOT)
v_object 0xc9d84108 ref 0 pages 0
lock type nfs:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 09:45:34AM +0900, Kazuaki ODA wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Yep, devfs as I suspected.
Keep an eye on the commit logs for when kib@ merges his fix.
Kris
Thanks. I'll test again after the fix is merged into RELENG_6, and post
the result.
I plan to ask the re@
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 08:25:00AM +0800, David Xu wrote:
On Thursday 19 October 2006 18:04, Kostik Belousov wrote:
The nfs_reply is sleeping with the PCATCH set. The question is why SIGTSTP
does not cause msleep to return with EINTR.
I have not been tracking the thread
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 11:57:48AM +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
On 10/31/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that they'll be demand-loaded if requested (e.g. if you try to
mount_nullfs). Maybe you or something else tried to mount such a
filesystem by accident?
But the point
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 12:02:43PM -0500, Steve Wills wrote:
On Nov 14, 2006, at 4:31 AM, Robert Watson wrote:
A backtrace would be helpful.
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x0
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 12:26:32PM +0300, Oleg Dambaev wrote:
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
Hello,
In my 6.2-PRERELEASE(one month old approximately) truss gets stuck exiting
when trying to truss a non existing file. I think the problem is not in
truss itself.
But I have not the skills to find
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 07:28:37PM -, Steven Hartland wrote:
The patch below fixed this issue for us. We had a jail which
when upgrading ( installworld ) from 5.4 to 6.1 would constantly
hang the machine with this error.
After updating md.c to 1.164 from MAIN and applying the patch
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 10:36:57PM -, Steven Hartland wrote:
Thanks for that, from our point of view its required
as without the machine deadlocks without even trying.
One real strange thing was that if I created a copy of
the vnode file, this particular task ( installworld )
would
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:30:39AM +0100, V??clav Haisman wrote:
Hi,
the attached lor.txt contains LOR I got this yesterday. It is FreeBSD 6.1
with relatively recent kernel, from last week or so.
--
VH
+lock order reversal:
+ 1st 0xc537f300 kqueue (kqueue) @
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 05:54:40AM -0800, Jason Vance wrote:
Posted Monday Nov 27th.
Is there a known conflict between gmirror and a quota enabled filesystem?
I have a FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE box that is setup with a gmirror RAID 1 using
two identical harddrives.
I installed quotas
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 07:15:37PM +0100, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Hello,
I just got this on a box I'm testing before installation.
It has clean RELENG_6 from about two weeks ago with only
some small if_bge.c-patches Bruce Evans sent me for testing
performance/hang problems.
Since I doubt
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 01:30:41PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
This may already be fixed, known, but...
Dec 3 13:14:41 thebighonker kernel: lock order reversal:
Dec 3 13:14:41 thebighonker kernel: 1st 0xff0093904c00 kqueue (kqueue)
@ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_event.c:1547
Dec 3
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 09:12:08PM +0100, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 07:15:37PM +0100, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Hello,
I just got this on a box I'm testing before installation.
It has clean RELENG_6 from about two weeks ago with only
some small
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 12:43:23AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Hi,
One of my NFS servers running 6.2-RC1 that are highly-loaded causes a
panic repeatedly these days. I am not sure which upgrading this
panic starts after precisely, but this was running for almost one
year (6.0R and 6.1R)
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:44:54AM -0800, Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:30:39AM +0100, V??clav Haisman wrote:
Hi,
the attached lor.txt contains LOR I got this yesterday. It is FreeBSD 6.1
with relatively recent kernel, from last week or so
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:49:42PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:44:54AM -0800, Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
Is the mount lock really required, if all we're doing is a single read of
a
single word (mnt_kern_flags) (v_mount
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 04:12:57AM +, Tor Egge wrote:
Hmm, may be, since vnode must be interlocked by ffs_sync() after
MNTK_SUSPENDED set, and before MNTK_SUSPEND, mount interlock is not
needed in ufs_itimes.
Tor ?
If neither IN_CHANGE nor IN_UPDATE is set then it might be unsafe
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 01:44:23PM +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
Hi,
we too, ran into this problem. OS/2 Clients kill our NFS server. It is
running a RELENG_6 snapshot from 2006-11-14. rpc.lockd and rpc.statd
are running. I'll conduct a test without those two services shortly.
You can
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 03:12:58PM +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
A tcpdump of the session can be found at:
http://coyote.dnsalias.net/rpc.pcap (9kB)
Am I right that all you did was ls -l root of nfs mount ? Does OS/2
supports the notion of .. directory ? Could you do just ls -l ..
from nfs
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 04:18:32PM +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
[Lot of debugging info trimmed to pacify you ]
Do you think you can fix it? Any idea why this seems to only happen
with OS/2 Clients?
It seems that my guess is right. OS/2 nfs client, in contrast to unix client,
send LOOKUP ..
, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Kostik Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ko What version of sys/nfsserver/nfs_serv.c do you use ? If it is
older than
ko 1.156.2.7, please, update the system.
Thanks, I updated it just now and see how it works
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 12:05:26AM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Gary Palmer wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 09:06:24PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
I got the following Filesystem:
FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused
/dev/da0a 1.3T422G
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 02:24:35AM -0500, Michael R. Wayne wrote:
We have a nubmer of similar machines that were initiallly formated
with 6.2 before it was released and have subsequently been upgraded
to 6.2-RELEASE with no issues. So, we upgraded a 6.1 box which has
been running fine as long
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:39:33AM +0100, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Hello,
I experience Fatal trap 12 when I shutdown if I have run the X server
(with nvidia driver 1.0.9746). This crash happen 4/5 of the time. It is
in devfs_populate_loop() in devfs.c. I don't have the vmcore anymore :-/.
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:41:58PM +0100, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Kostik Belousov wrote:
Does the nvidia driver don't play right with devfs ?
Thanks for your time,
See PR/108078
In my case hal is not installed. In PR/108078 the nvidia driver is there
too. So nvidia seems more a culprit
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:02:08AM -0600, Guy Helmer wrote:
Guy Helmer wrote:
Does this make sense to anyone (it doesn't to me - procfs_doprofile
simply locks, calls vn_fullpath, and unlocks)? I was trying to track
down a hang by running a system under stress, and instead got this
panic
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:55:18AM -0600, Guy Helmer wrote:
Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 06:38:26PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Index: fs/procfs/procfs.c
===
RCS file: /usr/local/arch/ncvs/src/sys/fs/procfs
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:49:23PM +0100, Frode Nordahl wrote:
On 27. nov. 2006, at 10.21, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:30:39AM +0100, V??clav Haisman wrote:
Hi,
the attached lor.txt contains LOR I got this yesterday. It is
FreeBSD 6.1
with relatively recent kernel
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 01:54:10PM +, Jason Thomson wrote:
Regarding:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-February/033241.html
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 06:50:37PM +, Jason Thomson wrote:
Try this (already committed to CURRENT as
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:05:32AM -0800, Peter Losher wrote:
We recently updated one of our dual Opteron systems (w/ 4GB RAM) from
5.5 to 6.2 (amd64 wipe and reinstalled) and about once a week, it panics
with the below message:
-=-
TPTE at 0x840028a0 IS ZERO @ VA 800514000
panic:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 06:28:30PM +, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:05:32AM -0800, Peter Losher wrote:
We recently updated one of our dual Opteron systems (w/ 4GB RAM) from
5.5 to 6.2 (amd64 wipe and reinstalled) and about
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:17:14PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:29PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
= How will it break them? swap backing only touches swap if there is
= memory pressure, i.e. precisely the
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:44:37PM +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Hello.
I'm experiencing the above mentioned LOR on a 6.2p1/amd64 box (running
gmirror and SMP if that matters).
With reference to your question on
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:22:38AM +0300, Oleg Derevenetz wrote:
Hi !
Sometimes (once a week approximately) I have a problem with the same
symptoms described here on SMP FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE with dual AMD Opteron(tm)
Processor 850:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=104406cat=
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 06:08:25PM +0300, Oleg Derevenetz wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:22:38AM +0300, Oleg Derevenetz wrote:
Sometimes (once a week approximately) I have a problem with the same
symptoms described here on SMP FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE with dual AMD
Opteron(tm)
Processor 850:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 09:50:54AM -0500, Doug Poland wrote:
Hello,
I would like to test 6.2-STABLE's ability to handle UFS2, quotas, and
snapshots. In particular, I would like to make sure the deadlock
issue is resolved,
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:21:13AM +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
Hi,
One of our fileservers deadlocked, again. It is running RELENG_6 from
2006-11-14 and was running dump(8) -L on a 11% filled 400GB UFS2
volume. It is hanging for 3h hours now, and there is no disk activity.
# ps axl |
I have Acer laptop with the Atheros card, identified as
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0: class=0x02 card=0x04181468 chip=0x001a168c rev=0x01
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Atheros Communications Inc.'
class = network
subclass = ethernet
Corresponding dmesg lines are
ath0:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 03:56:32AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:08:48PM +, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
At work, amoungst my stable of old computers running FreeBSD, I have a
Fujitsu M800 - a 4 Zeon SMP processor with 4 GB of memory. This
primarily runs Nagios and
. After that, manually
adding calloc.c to the MISRCS in Makefile.inc and installing libc put
the system in order.
I suppose that this is simple MFC error. Please, correct it before big
havoc hit the
stable boxes !
Best regards,
Kostik Belousov
___
freebsd
/interrupt.h rev. 1.32
shall be (partially) mfc'ed too, or (much more lilkely)
reference to db_dump_intr_event shall be removed.
Best regards,
Kostik Belousov
pgpc2Iam26DFT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 03:41:55PM -0800, Jeff Roberson wrote:
I plan to MFC all of this lovely stuff for 6.1:
http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/vfsmfc.diff
I'm looking for people who are willing to patch their stable boxes and
test this. This has the following changes in it:
1)
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 02:15:56AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 11:50:29PM +, Nick Barnes wrote:
At 2006-03-02 22:24:17+, Nik Clayton writes:
I'm failing to understand how getrusage() works, which is a bit
perplexing,
because it doesn't seem like it would
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 06:06:31PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 12:11:56PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 02:15:56AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
Personally, I'd like to say a me too. /me too fails to see why
in a quiet, idle system ru_maxrss
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 01:57:50PM +0200, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
This is still a concern for me. IMHO it would be useful to have the ability
to disable process killing due to the lack of swap, because having this
enabled on e.g. transit router can lead to very unpleasant scenario.
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:49:50AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 06:12:59PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
It may be desirable to add ru_maxrss sampling at the calcru time too.
Something like this:
Index: sys/kern/kern_resource.c
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 11:48:06AM -0800, Jon Dama wrote:
If you feel this situation is undesirable, the first thing to do is to put
together the patches necessary to allow the kernel to actually track how
much ram+swap might be needed to cover the address-space allocations
that have been
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:41:32PM +0800, David Xu wrote:
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 15:27, Martin wrote:
David Xu wrote:
Can anyone add this to 6.1 todo list ? this definitely should be fixed
before
6.1R.
One of my friends also has found kern/94278:
Sorry for garbled patch. I do not know why mutt decided to encode
some = as =3D.
Index: compat/linux/linux_misc.c
===
RCS file: /usr/local/arch/ncvs/src/sys/compat/linux/linux_misc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.172
diff -u -r1.172
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 09:17:49PM +0800, David Xu wrote:
I know, someone will work out such a messy patch, but is it reasonable ?
why does not the fifi code suddenly work with well defined vnode interface ?
why did someone want to break the well defined FILE-vnode-fs-device
layers ? sigh.
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 06:51:42PM +0800, Ariff Abdullah wrote:
I think I've read somewhere about panic during early root mount, fsck
etc.. Perhaps this might be related:
Full dmesg: http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/misc/dmesg.boot.amd64
[]
acquiring duplicate lock of same type: vnode
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 09:07:48PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
в?второк 21 березень 2006 20:53, Matthew Dillon Ви написали:
Ah ha. That's the problem. I don't know why you are getting a write
error, but that is preventing the client from cleaning out the dirty
buffers. The
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 11:29:45AM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
In particular, the command-line used by the nagios plug-in check_procs
produces:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/imb /bin/ps axwo 'state uid ppid vsz rss pcpu ucomm
command'
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Removing 'ppid' stops
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 08:09:32AM -0500, Chris Dillon wrote:
Quoting Dmitry Morozovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
KK Also you should add DEBUG_LOCKS and DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS on the off chance
KK they catch the problem.
I got one thought about the source of
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 07:06:11PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Chris Dillon wrote:
CD Please, also add DDB to the kernel and show the result of the
CD show lockedvnodes
CD alltrace
CD ps
CD in the DDB after the deadlock, as asked by Kris Kennaway earlier
CD
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 08:05:25PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Kostik Belousov wrote:
KB I just made lab machine with serial console, compile minimal kernel
with quotas
KB and KDB+WITNESS, and immediately after ``quotacheck /var quotaon
/var'' got
KB
KB
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:43:42PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
KK What people are seeing now must be some other problem that I wan't
KK able to reproduce.
KK
KK Once I hear back from someone who can reproduce it with debugging
KK enabled (I'm
1 - 100 of 406 matches
Mail list logo
