know what settings they used to have a successful installation?
Thanks
Paul
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to time as the system is not stable in its current state.
What tools do people use to diagnose such problems as I have never
had this problem in Freebsd?
Thanks,
Paul
I have been having troubles installing the amd64 platform on an
Intel S5000pal system with the SRCS16 Raid controller using Raid 5
root on bootup, and there are freezes that seem to happen
from time to time when writing to the file system). I am still trying
to debug these problems but have not found anyone with the same
mother board yet with a working 6.2 amd64 install.
I hope this helps.
Cheers,
Paul
At 02:43 PM 06
,
Paul
At 11:25 PM 03/02/2007, you wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone have any suggestions how to better diagnose this problem?
I have installed a trimmed down custom kernel with a rebuild of the
latest stable version and it did not make a difference.
It would be great to get to the bottom
here?
Regards,
Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.tribble.net/
Supreme Court says pornography is anything without artistic merit that
causes sexual thought, that's their definition, essentially. No artistic
merit, causes sexual thought. Hmm. Sounds like... every commercial on
television, doesn't
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 12:58:19PM -0600, Paul wrote:
Bingo! It was -pipe. It appears the man page for gcc is somewhat
innaccurate in saying -pipe doesn't cause problems with the gnu
assembler...
Nope, it must have been CPUTYPE.
Regards,
Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.tribble.net
in and recompile the world and kernel and it worked
fine...
it doesn't look like you're even using CPUTYPE, but perhaps some of those
other optimizations are causing you trouble.
Regards,
Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.tribble.net/
You can't have everything. Where would you put
, everyone interested check out:
http://www.sysadminmag.com/articles/2001/0108/0108q/0108q.htm
Regards,
Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.tribble.net/
You can't have everything. Where would you put it?
-- Steven Wright
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
?
Thanks,
P.
Paul Sandys
network operations manager
http://www.nyct.net/
212.293.2620
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a total size of
1.7T and a usage of 63G
Any suggestions or help on this would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Paul
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any
fixes the problem.
It is now superfast when running ls -lh.
Thanks again!
Cheers
Paul
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems that a lot of CPU resources are spend when trying to get exclusive
lock on file from multiple processes concurrently. By multiple i mean hundreds.
It seems that there's an initial cost of fcntl() call. Each process that tries
to lock the file consumes some amount of CPU and cools down.
Hi dev team,
It's not a secret that when application is trying to establish new TCP
connection, without
first binding a socket to specific local interface address, OS handles that
automatically.
Unfortunately there is a catch, that lies in a different logic of local port
allocation:
(1) when
1.25MB
Do note, that, not only multiple queues cause issues they also dramatically
decrease the performance of the network.
Using `sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.ts_offset_per_conn=0` didn't help at all.
Best regards,
-Paul
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
19 October 2019, 19:35:24, by "Michael Tuexen"
:
> > On 19. Oct 2019, at 18:09, Paul wrote:
> >
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > Thank you, for taking your time!
> >
> > We use physical machines. We don not have any special `pf` rules.
>
went away
> when I connected the two machines with a cable, bypassing the network.
> Might be worth a try, if you can do it?
>
> Good luck with it, rick
>
>
> From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org on behalf
> of Paul
> Sen
really appreciated.
Best regards,
-Paul
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
-master UDMA133
Hope someone can shed a light on this.
Regards,
Paul Schenkeveld
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 5 May 2006 05:33 pm, Paul Koch wrote:
Hi,
I have just upgraded some of our product build machines to 6.1RC2 and
I am having a few problems getting a custom install.cfg to work with
the way sysinstall now selects/installs kernels. I am trying to
select a custom distribution set using
someone knows why that would be the wrong thing to do?
Paul
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. I have watched raid system lose
It's a hard problem that's why you buy a box to do it:
http://www.emc-rainwall.com
Rainfinity (recently bought by EMC) has patents on actual
peer-reviewed data-replication algorithms.
Paul
___
freebsd
Dear all:
I find the sendmail-sasl port will not compile with the option
SASLv2 and I can not get SMTP Auth. The port will install TLS and
Cyrus-SASL but as I use the command --sendmail -d0.1 -bv root | grep SASL--
I can not find it compiled with SASL.
Any solution to fix it. THX.
like to
hear from anyone using them successfully too. :)
-Paul-
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Civati) writes:
For those of you wishing to PXE boot 6.1 RELEASE I have made some boot
images that work easily with pxelinux (syslinux) PXE set-up.
[..]
Download and a quick pxelinux set-up howto:
http://blog.rackred.com/2006
From Jonathan Noack [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thu, May 25, 2006 at 07:56:07PM -0400:
I am currently running with the following in /etc/rc.conf and haven't
experienced any problems:
tmpmfs_flags=-S -o async
Is there a way to accomplish this with an fstab entry?
md /tmpmfs
Dear all:
Recently I installed HylaFAX port on 6.1 and find that the fax received (Fax
is received in /var/hylafax/recvq and changed to tiff format) can not sent
to specified email user and find the error log below:
May 30 04:08:56 office sendmail[624]: k4TK8t7A000620: to=ee-fax,
delay=00:00:01,
create a pr?
Paul
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From M.Hirsch [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 01:38:35AM +0200:
Sticks don't just break on a single bit. From my experience, a stick
that's got any problems at all, will cause even more trouble soon...
If a hardware problem isn't worth panick'ing, what else is?
(don't answer this one
From Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 05:53:38PM -0400:
Mathieu Arnold wrote:
| Exactly, its nice being able to see the current values. How else can i
| see what the values are set to?
As I previously said, it's 512M on i386, and 1G on 64 bit platforms.
Right,
From Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 01:16:47PM -0400:
Chuck Swiger wrote:
512MB is more than enough for almost all processes to run just fine,
and is only really inappropriate for the case where you've got 1-plus
GB of physical RAM and want to dedicate the system to a
From Julian H. Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 01:45:16AM
+0200:
Negative isnt an example of programming error, just that the system
is now using the last bit only root can use.
for insight try for example
man tunefs
reboot
boot -s
tunefs -m 2
multiple 1850's where things work as
expected. (Really happy with IPMI support there :-))
Paul
# kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel vmcore.3
[GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads:
/usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Undefined symbol ps_pglobal_lookup]
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software
of Loopback packets and everything
works just fine.
Not sure if the second issue would be a problem for normal installations
though.
Paul.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
=0x02
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation'
device = 'BCM4309 802.11a/b/g Wireless LAN Controller'
class= network
Any help is gratefully appreciated.
Cheers,
Paul.
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production
revision 1.11
date: 2006/06/20 22:41:44; author: ps; state: Exp; lines: +77 -202
Instead of using scsi probes to do device discovery, use the firmware
commands to grab the device listing. This resolves issues using
multiple volumes, where each volume was actually internally pointing
to target
the following mount entry in the the mount-command
output:
/dev/ad1s1c.bde on /private/bde_ad1s1c (ufs, local, soft-updates)
It seems to me that this is really something that belongs in devd. Boot-time
is decidedly not ideal.
Paul
,
Paul.
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production
deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid.
--- Frank Vincent Zappa
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
this was fixed after 6.1-RELEASE. You need to grab the driver from -stable.
Ivan Voras wrote:
I had a chance today to play a little with a server that was later
passed on for deployment, and one of the thing I tried to do was create
something unusual - three disk groups/virtual disks on the
Marko Lerota wrote:
Paul Saab [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
this was fixed after 6.1-RELEASE. You need to grab the driver from -stable.
What does it mean? That I could run 6.1-RELEASE but have some drivers
from -stable or -current?
You can use the -stable driver on 6.1-RELEASE if you
with
respect to the scheduler. I think the number you really need is not
how long giant was held but how long was spent waiting for it.
Paul
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
for a while.
Paul
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The 5754 is more than likely supported by the bge driver. The PCI id's
probably have to be added.
Kevin Kramer wrote:
Sorry, I thought that you and others were working on numerous Broadcom
issues including incorrect recognition of the chipsets for the
Poweredge 1950's and Precision 390. You
mprotect and SEGV).
Obviously this was an unusual case but it's unfortuantely proof that
some things escape having the necessary compat lines in your kernel
conf.
Still I counted myself lucky.
Paul
___
freebsd-stable
with it. The downside of course is that a
Smartbits with gigE ports isn't cheap, but I'd be surprised if Intel
didn't have one kicking around somewhere.
-Bill
--
=
-Bill Paul(510) 749-2329 | Senior Engineer
Bill Paul wrote:
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
On 10/19/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 02:18:13PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
The engineer in our test group has installed 6.2 BETA2 and attempted via a
number of tests
--
=
-Bill Paul(510) 749-2329 | Senior Engineer, Master of Unix-Fu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Wind River Systems
=
adamw you're
straightforward. It's worth a shot
at any rate.
-Bill
--
=
-Bill Paul(510) 749-2329 | Senior Engineer, Master of Unix-Fu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Wind River Systems
From Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 07:44:45PM -0400:
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Oct 23, 2006, at 4:01 PM, Mike Jakubik wrote:
So, first of all, am i crazy for choosing fbsd+mysql for this
rather than something like Solaris + Oracle? :)
Moderately...it kinda depends on
object such as a stripe (though usually
you would want to stripe mirrors instead of mirroring stripes).
HTH
-Guido
Paul Schenkeveld
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send
There is another alternative to just doing the cvsup...
Kövesdán Gábor wrote:
Maher Mohamed wrote:
how can i upgrade my cvsup weekly with an auto way?
You should use crondaemon. Place the following line to the end of
/etc/crontab:
15 4 * * 6 rootcvsup
is woefully inefficient compared to
the faster one? Suppose both tests turn out to take roughly the same
time. Should I conclude that the OS residing on the inside is just as
efficient as the other OS?
Cheers,
Paul.
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch
I've encountered believe that to be the case.
As it says in the BUGS section of the diskinfo man page: There are in
order of increasing severity: lies, damn lies, statistics, and computer
benchmarks. ;-)
Cheers,
Paul.
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch
for resources
and affect performance in a way not measured when the systems are
benchmarked in isolation.
I guess the preferred colour for the consumers of benchmarks is black
and white, when in reality what you get are subtle shades of grey. :-)
Cheers,
Paul.
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Without music
/forums/showthread.php?t=28875
--
Paul Boehmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
needed for my geom_mirror, which takes a lot
longer than a fsck.) I understand that fsck delays for large file
systems is the major impetus behind the journalling work, not as a fix
for a perceived data consistency problem.
Cheers,
Paul.
PS: I also use softupdates on my NetBSD systems, again
, but that doesn't
guarantee they will be written successfully any more than observing the
relative number left outstanding.
Cheers,
Paul.
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production
deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 17:14 +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
Paul Mather [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why would that necessarily be more successful? If the outstanding
buffers count is not reducing between time intervals, it is most likely
because there is some underlying hardware problem (e.g
-RELEASE, you might
miss these ongoing improvements that crop up from time to time.
Cheers,
Paul.
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production
deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid.
--- Frank Vincent Zappa
), but that it did not seem to be taken seriously
when it had done so. (Though, as Robert said, if the developers can't
reproduce the problem, it's hard for them to work on and fix it.)
Cheers,
Paul.
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production
to generate synthetic I/O load and measure performance.
Cheers,
Paul.
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production
deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid.
--- Frank Vincent Zappa
yours. ;-)
BTW, if you consider softupdates fundamentally broken wrt data
integrity, why don't you post your concerns to -current or -hackers,
say? Surely the developers to address the problem are more likely to be
found reading there?
Cheers,
Paul.
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Without music
could be shorter.
Personally, I may put 6.0 on a test machine, but I
won't put it in production. I don't work that way.
I will go to 5.5, I'm sure, on my servers. I update
from source fairly regularly. And that was the original
question: Why would 5.5 come out after 6.0?
Scott Long wrote:
Paul T
--
=
-Bill Paul(510) 749-2329 | Senior Engineer, Master of Unix-Fu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Wind River Systems
=
adamw you're just BEGGING to face
-stable.
--
Paul Keusemann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4266 Joppa Court (952) 894-7805
Savage, MN 55378
SMP: Added CPU 1 (BSP)
SMP: Added CPU 0 (AP)
MPTable: IBM-PCCO CrossFire MP
APIC ID: physical 0, logical 0:0
APIC
or something where
there may be more answers.
I don't know if there is a PR for this, yet. I had thought of filing
one, but I sort of forgot. Check the archives to see if someone else did.
Billy
Paul Keusemann wrote:
Hi,
I've got an IBM Intellistation M Pro with dual 600 Mhz PIIIs, an IBM
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:00:09PM +0100, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
On 09 Nov Paul Keusemann wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:27:33PM -0600, Billy Newsom wrote:
See my posts and others on these topics:
critical BOOT failure updating to latest 5-Stable (5.4)
5.3 - 5.4 breaks ATA (Intel
Paul.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for space on the floppy anymore after getting rid of the
second GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE text.
Paul.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 07:03 am, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 09:28:27PM +1000, Paul Koch wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 07:24 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Issue 1: Can't install on a Pentium P5 class machine:
The install panics when installing the base stuff. No useful
and virtual keyboard/mouse/video.
It is accessed remotely via IP and replaces the need to KVM
switches/cabling. The card contains its own tiny OS and IP stack.
Paul.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Hi ..
Having read the man page, there is alot in there that makes me
wonder whether going with a HP Smart Array P600 is a wise idea ...
The Compaq ciss adapters require faked responses to get reasonable
behavior out of them. In addition, the ciss command set is
Sascha Holzleiter wrote:
do you know of any method to monitor these controllers with FreeBSD,
e.g. to detect drive failures?
No, but the code is in the driver and can be easily adapted to a
userland program to probe the controller through the ioctl interface,
but the easiest way is to just
and
the mouse is plugged in, it boots fine.
Paul.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it is already covered in PR i386/69750.
Paul.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
Paul.
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production
deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid.
--- Frank Vincent Zappa
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
/dhclient.leases* at shutdown.
-paul
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
and/or proprietary information intended only for the addressee.
Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance on
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may
constitute
time to pick up the line. This doesn't happen on
a 5.4-stable box with 6 modems connected, but 5.4-stable appears
to have other hanging issues, thus why I am trying out 6.0-stable.
Recent changes to ohci.c (1.154.2.1) in this area (2 days ago) ??
Should I raise a PR ?
Paul.
# kgdb
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 09:02 pm, Ian Dowse wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul Koch
writes:
As soon at the modem rings, the machine panics. I don't think the
modem even gets time to pick up the line. This doesn't happen on
a 5.4-stable box with 6 modems connected, but 5.4-stable appears
which merges our stuff from
rc.conf.local into rc.conf, just to keep it clean.
Just to be safe, we quote everything in install.cfg. As in
echo 'sshd_enable=YES' /etc/rc.conf.local
Paul.
--
Paul Koch
CTO
Statseeker
___
freebsd-stable
, it complains that the stack is
garbled.
The good news: I can reproduce this at any time with just setkey -D.
No special kernel tweaks except for adding IPSEC into the config,
so I'm hoping many of you can reproduce this, and hopefuly someone
else with more debugging foo.
Anyone?
-Paul
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Paul Herman wrote:
Just installed 6.0-STABLE/amd64 (cvsup from within the last day) onto a K8
Sempron with IPSEC compiled in and I get a kernel panic when I try to run
racoon. Anyone else seen this?
(Replying to myself...)
Just saw this is PR 89261. Sorry
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:46:00PM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote:
Hello,
I'm running FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE on my new desktop. It has the
following hardware:
- Intel Core 2 Duo 6400
- Asus P5B motherboard
- On-board Realtek NIC (8168B/8111B)
For some reason, it drops
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:46:00PM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote:
Hello,
I'm running FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE on my new desktop. It has the
following hardware:
- Intel Core 2 Duo 6400
- Asus P5B motherboard
- On-board Realtek NIC (8168B/8111B)
For some reason,
* Bill Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's more likely a problem with the multicast filter programming.
IPv6 is all about the multicasting (neighbord discovery depends on it
to work correctly). I can't explain why it's not working though.
I've tested the sample 8168B/8111B cards
Hello Bill,
* Bill Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Switching from and to promiscuous mode takes 7 seconds. All packets
are dropped in the mean time.
The SIOCSIFFLAGS handler in re_ioctl() currently just takes a shortcut
of calling re_init(). While this does eventually end up
Since this was just seen, and the patch below validated as working I wanted
to send general email to capture this:
The Lenovo X60 can have issues with long ping times, this is a KNOWN
hardware problem, and Intel is working with IBM/Lenovo, a final 'fix' has
not been decided on yet.
Has anyone else observed that fusefs appears to suffer from
the race-to-root problem that used to plague NFS prior to rev
1.39 of vfs_lookup.c?
Paul
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Thanks for a couple of previous suggestions, but I still have the same
problem. I checked the symbolic link for X and it appeared correct, except
for the group access:
lrwxrwxr-x 1 root 12000 24 May 28 20:58 /usr/X11R6/bin/X -
/usr/X11R6/bin/XF86_Mach64*
I recreated it as wheel.
out of date. Here's
what worked:
*Deinstalling* /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base, rebuilding, and reinstalling
the latest version.
--
Paul L. Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TraiCom Services, Inc. http://www.traicom.interhack.net
pens. But, I wanted to send a message to the
list while I'm doing that.
Thanks!
--Paul A. Howes
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
built!
I resorted to modifying the
/usr/ports/graphics/xpm/work/xpm-3.4k/lib/Makefile to have an appropriate
target:
libXpm.so.4: $(OBJS) $(EXTRALIBRARYDEPS)
gcc -shared -o libXpm.so.4 $(OBJS)
Is this a known problem? Is there a fix in the works?
Thanks!
--
Paul A. Howes
To Unsubsc
build version (07X).
Build 079 is the latest build from Intel and it is the only PXE 2.0 rom
that I know of which has no known bugs.
Anything newer than 079, I have not tested myself..
paul
Alan Edmonds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Is anyone using pxeboot from 4.0-STABLE with the latest Intel
Is this just me,
Yes, it is just you. You probably don't have the card seated properly, or
it's posessed by Satan. (Of course it's a PNIC so that's a given.) Forgive
me if I don't get to worked up over it.
And I don't care what fxp does in the same box.
-Bill
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
Rebuild genassym
paul
The Hermit Hacker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I've tried to remove locore.s, no difference. I've tried building
GENERIC, just in case I erroneously removed something while building my
custom kernel, same error ...
I'm going from a fresh install of 4.1-RELEASE - 4.1
"Corey G." wrote:
I installed three new installations of FreeBSD 4.1.1 in the last 8 days.
All three systems entirely different. One system with a Logitech 3
button mouse, one with a Microsoft 2 button and another off brand 2
button mouse. All three machines have seen the psmintr: out of
, it was a loader issue with the BIOS.
The PXE bug you are seeing is with anything build 078 or earlier.
Intel has a bug in their rom which they fixed back in March of this year.
--
Paul Saab
Technical Yahoo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do You .. uhh .. Yahoo!?
To Unsubscribe
/ideas.
Thanks,
Paul
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
I want to join the FBSD - Stable mailing list
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
st have something screwy in
my configuration?
--
Paul A. Howes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
buildworld
21000.301u 3108.041s 6:58:32.11 96.0% -437+-279k 60375+139194io 4213pf+0w
time make -j 4 buildkernel KERNEL=SERVER
2157.887u 206.656s 40:55.45 96.2% 1456+1979k 6446+10936io 359pf+0w
--
Paul A. Howes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with &q
1 - 100 of 543 matches
Mail list logo
