"Eugene M. Zheganin" wrote:
> On 05.08.2017 22:08, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> >
> > pool: userdata
> > state: ONLINE
> > status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data
> > corruption. Applications may be affected.
> > action: Restore the
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> On 05/15/2017 08:09 PM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > While trying to rename a zpool from zroot to vega,
> > I ended up in this strange situation:
> > nik@vega:~ % zfs list -t all
> > NAME USED AVAIL REFER
Pete French wrote:
> I have a number of machines in Azure, all booting from ZFS and, until
> the weekend, running 10.3 perfectly happily.
>
> I started upgrading these to 11. The first went fine, the second would
> not boot. Looking at the boot diagnistics it is
"Matthew X. Economou" wrote:
> My FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p16 server crashes in the middle of a Poudriere
> bulk run (see below). This crash happens even if I lower
> vfs.zfs.arc_max or tweak vm.v_free_min/target/reserved/severe. I'm
> looking for configuration advice in case
After rebasing some of my systems from r305866 to r307312
(plus local patches) I noticed that most of the ARC accesses
are counted as misses now.
Example:
[fk@elektrobier2 ~]$ uptime
2:03PM up 1 day, 18:36, 7 users, load averages: 0.29, 0.36, 0.30
[fk@elektrobier2 ~]$ zfs-stats -E
Matthias Meyser wrote:
> ist there a way to get the correspondig wlandev of an existing wlan?
>
> e.g.
>
> I have one urtwn0 an one run0 an one configured wlan0.
>
> How do i know where wlan0 belongs to?
Try: sysctl net.wlan.0.%parent
Fabian
pgp5linSIydgJ.pgp
Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> ZFS has it's place, it is very good at some things, it brings features
> that people need.
> ZFS does not work (is not stable) on i386 without recompiling the
> kernel, but it is presented as an installation option.
> ZFS is compiled in by default
Marko Cupać wrote:
> I just found out that 10.2-RELEASE-p2 lost ability to bootstrap pkg
> with signature_type="pubkey".
>
> Quick search returns:
> https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/issues/1309
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202622
>
> I guess it is not
Chris Ross cross+free...@distal.com wrote:
Yeah, this is the same panic you, I, and others have been seeing on
sparc64's with bge's, or at least v240's (and one other IIRC) for many
many months. Thanks for grabbing a core!
Does it make a difference if you boot with hw.bge.allow_asf=0?
Kurt Lidl l...@pix.net wrote:
[-stable@ in CC since these are the first 10.2-PRERELEASE builds
available since the code slush went into effect, which marks the start
of the release cycle.]
New FreeBSD development branch installation ISOs and virtual machine
disk images have been
Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
[-stable@ in CC since these are the first 10.2-PRERELEASE builds
available since the code slush went into effect, which marks the start
of the release cycle.]
New FreeBSD development branch installation ISOs and virtual machine
disk images have been
Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 03:19:18PM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org wrote:
If you want a PR for it, I'll file one, but all it's going to contain is
the contents of this Email.
My impression is that your emails
Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 02:52:57PM -0800, Xin Li wrote:
On 02/08/13 14:29, Dan Langille wrote:
Here is a patch against FreeBSD 9.1 STABLE which implements ZFS LZ4
compression.
https://plus.google.com/106386350930626759085/posts/PLbkNfndPiM
Greg Bonett greg.bon...@gmail.com wrote:
My next plan would be reporting the problem with sufficient
information so the bug can be fixed.
Destroying the dataset or the whole pool seems like papering over the
real issue to me and you could still do it if the PR gets ignored for
too
Greg Bonett greg.bon...@gmail.com wrote:
Many months ago, I believe some *very bad hardware* caused corruption of a
file on one of my zfs file systems. I've isolated the corrupted file and
can reliably induce a kernel panic with touch bad.file, rm bad.file, or
ls -l in the bad.file's
Harald Schmalzbauer h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
I've a failed disk at a remote server, which shouldn't be a problem
actually.
Welcome to geom ...
Just for info, here's the last shout:
kernel: (da5:mps0:0:5:0): SYNCHRONIZE CACHE(10). CDB: 35 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 length 0 SMID 256
joerg_surmann joerg_surm...@snafu.de wrote:
Sorry, i no had enough time for this geli problem.
I work with a testsystem.
When start booting in verbose mode the system found the keypaths.
Preloaded ada0p4:geli_keyfile0 /root/keys/ada0p4.key at 0xc14bf540.
Preloaded ada1p4:geli_keyfile1
joerg_surmann joerg_surm...@snafu.de wrote:
i have two partitions: ada0p3.eli and ada1p3.eli
on bootprocess i must type a passphrase for ada0p3 and have ada0p3.eli.
next i type the passphrase for ada1p3 and i become: wrong key
when the bootprocess is finish and i login and type geli attach
Thomas Steen Rasmussen tho...@gibfest.dk wrote:
Just to let everyone know that this is still an issue.
I am trying to install FreeBSD 9.0 amd64 on a Lenovo X121e and I
can't get it to accept the geli passphrase during boot. I've confirmed
using kern.geom.eli.visible_passphrase=1 that the
Matthew X. Economou xenop...@irtnog.org wrote:
Fabian Keil writes:
Anyway, it's a test without file system so the ZFS overhead isn't
measured. I wasn't entirely clear about it, but my assumption was
that the ZFS overhead might be big enough to make the difference
between HMAC/MD5
xenophon\\+freebsd xenophon+free...@irtnog.org wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Fabian Keil [mailto:freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 11:49 AM
It's not clear to me why you enable geli integrity verification.
Given that it is single-sector-based
xenophon\\+freebsd xenophon+free...@irtnog.org wrote:
I have posted revised instructions for installing FreeBSD to an
encrypted ZFS pool on my blog:
https://web.irtnog.org/~xenophon/blog/revised-freebsd-root-zfs-geli
The entire procedure is documented in a way suitable for scripting. I
Greg Rivers gcr+freebsd-sta...@tharned.org wrote:
sysutils/pftop was marked broken on 9.x and above last March[1]. Are
there any plans to fix it soon? It's a really handy utility.
[1]
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/pftop/Makefile?rev=1.17
Please have a look at:
Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 18 October 2011 16:43, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 04:32:11PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
I have PHP executing as fastcgi via the mod_fcgid module in Apache. I
suspect there is a bug in PHP or one of its
Christopher J. Ruwe c...@cruwe.de wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 22:30:56 +0100
Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:00:19PM +0100, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote:
I use a mostly geli encrypted hd on my Thinkpad R500,
with /compat, /usr, /tmp and /var all on
Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 03:33:29PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote:
I'm seeing this problem on my machine at work. It's an HP DC 7800,
mounts an ich9 chipset(not ahci capable). I'm attaching the dmesg.
I noticed this in the past, but it got
Pertti Kosunen pertti.kosu...@pp.nic.fi wrote:
Kip Macy wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
continue to work without upgrade.
Mounting local file systems:.
internal error: out of
Robert Noland rnol...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 23:33 -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Robert Noland wrote:
If I start rebooting before it is printed, the system locks up. Of
course, this is only after rebooting several times.
Here is a successful
Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes,that's is what I want to say.
In other word is the command zfs allow and zfs unallow
I think it is not Support chflags(2) which is described in at the
bottom of http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFS
Sorry, my unclear use of english! I didn't mean the last
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 20 October 2008 11:22:08 you wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 08:37:40AM -0200, JoaoBR wrote:
On Friday 17 October 2008 15:39:59 Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Oct 17, 2008, at 11:30 AM, JoaoBR wrote:
constantly I find data corruption on ZFS volums,
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 03:07:30PM -0200, JoaoBR wrote:
On Monday 20 October 2008 11:22:08 you wrote:
Also, do you not think it's a little odd that the only data
corruption occurring for you are related to RRDtool?
this yes I think is
Steve Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an older storage box that I've upgraded to -stable. It currently
uses 7 SCSI disks mashed together with gstripe.
I've recently replaced this box with a new one running a ZFS setup. I'm
now wanting to turn the old one into a storage device
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
man page thar zfs can not be a dump device, not sure if I understand it
as meant but I can dump to zfs very well and fast as long as
recordsize=128
I assume you tried dump(8), while the sentence in the man
page is about using a ZFS volume as dumpon(8) target:
Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was trying to play a VCD (using mplayer) on my 6-STABLE system and
it runs for a while and then crashes. This is reproducable with the
same traceback.
kgdb reports:
acd0: FAILURE - device detached
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/05/07, Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:17:57PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
Agreed. 6.3-RELEASE would nominally be due around July but the lack
of any schedule on http://www.freebsd.org/releng/ suggests that it will
Petr Holub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've encountered a deterministic kernel panic when
blanking one specific CD-RW media using cdrecord.
The kernel panic details follow and dmesg is at the end of this
email. Though I understand there's something wrong with the media,
I think it shouldn't
LI Xin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that threaded perl is broken on 6.2-RELEASE and 7-CURRENT. I
have tried some option combinations with no luck, if WITH_THREADED=yes
is specified then the build would fail with a coredump.
Any hints?
I ran into the same miniperl core dumps a few days
Mark Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
get*by*_r() are deprecated on most platforms and there use
is highly non-portable, lots of different API's.
Why are we adding compatability for deprecated functions?
I was wondering the same thing, especially because it causes a lot
of
Torfinn Ingolfsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:13:12 +0200
Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For information: I'm still trying to find a sodimm card for this
machine, as everything would be easier if it had more memory.
We'll see how I manage that; here in Norway
Torfinn Ingolfsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an old laptop, a Compaq Armada 1580DMT, with 16M RAM, 2GB hd,
floppy and CD-rom. It doesn't have built in networking, neither wired
nor wireless. It does have PC card slots. It has had FreeBSD 4.9-release
installed a long time, and was
Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Thoenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To you have pf running? If so can you turn it off for a bit a see
if you still crash. On my box I was getting all sorts of witness
kbd backtraces on pf and since
Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Thoenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To you have pf running? If so can you turn it off for a bit a see if
you still crash. On my box I was getting all sorts of witness kbd
backtraces on pf and since turning pf off (maybe a week ago),
haven't
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
I just got:
Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: lock order reversal:
Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: 1st 0xc3795000 kqueue (kqueue) @
/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_event.c:1053
Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: 2nd 0xc1043144
Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
I just got:
Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: lock order reversal:
Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: 1st 0xc3795000 kqueue (kqueue) @
/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_event.c:1053
Peter Thoenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To you have pf running? If so can you turn it off for a bit a see if
you still crash. On my box I was getting all sorts of witness kbd
backtraces on pf and since turning pf off (maybe a week ago), haven't
crashed yet. Going to let it keep running
Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It sounds like your serial console server may not know how to map
SSH break signals into remote serial break signals. Try
ALT_BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER. Here's
Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the last episode (Jul 02), Robert Watson said:
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
The ssh man page offers:
|~B Send a BREAK to the remote system (only useful for SSH
|protocol version 2 and if the peer supports it).
I am
Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It sounds like your serial console server may not know how to map
SSH break signals into remote serial break signals. Try
ALT_BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER. Here's the description from NOTES:
# Solaris implements a new
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
There was a request for Tor related problem reports a while ago,
I couldn't find the message again, but I believe it was posted here.
I'm very interested in tracking down this problem, but have had a lot
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
After manually triggering a test panic through debug.kdb.enter I
could enter ddb and everything seemed to be working.
However today I got another hang and couldn't enter the debugger by
sending BREAK
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
I am using ssh 2, but the only reaction I get is a new line.
|FreeBSD/i386 (tor.fabiankeil.de) (ttyd0)
|
|login: ~B
|
It sounds like your serial console server may not know how to map SSH
break signals
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
I wish I could. The machine died before I read your message.
I was logged in on the serial console running tail
-f /var/log/messages. Last messages were:
Jun 29 00:42:20 tor kernel: Memory modified after
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
There was a request for Tor related problem reports a while ago,
I couldn't find the message again, but I believe it was posted here.
I'm very interested in tracking down this problem, but have had a lot
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Are there any warnings on the console from WITNESS or other
debugging options?
I just got:
Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: lock order reversal:
Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: 1st 0xc3795000 kqueue (kqueue) @
/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_event.c:1053
Jun 28
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Are there any warnings on the console from WITNESS or other
debugging options?
I just got:
Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: lock order reversal:
Jun 28 23:01:19
There was a request for Tor related problem reports
a while ago, I couldn't find the message again, but I
believe it was posted here.
Last week I installed:
FreeBSD tor.fabiankeil.de 6.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD
6.1-RELEASE-p2 #0: Fri Jun 23 20:06:57 CEST 2006
[EMAIL
Stanislaw Halik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 25, 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
Interestingly enough , i had some nasty issues todays on same
laptop. I had 2 x 6 GB GELI vnodes, running mtree -K md5digest to
compare contents. Disk IO was high as expected...but then it just
died down
Iasen Kostov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 16:54 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 06:01:30PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
I get a very easy to reproduce panic on 6.1-STABLE :
/etc/periodic/weekly/310.locate panics with
panic:
Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2006 22:01:16 -0400
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what is the traceback?
See the developers handbook for more information.
doh! yes, i'll get onto this as soon as I can.
Interestingly enough , i had some nasty
Arno J. Klaassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I get a very easy to reproduce panic on 6.1-STABLE :
/etc/periodic/weekly/310.locate panics with
panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 335544320 total
allocated
This box has nothing particular, apart from maybe a large number
To encrypt my home slice with geli I followed
17.16.2 Disk Encryption with geli:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/disks-encrypting.html#AEN26326
As I prefer to have my home directory available after boot,
I additionally added:
geli_devices=ad0s1
geli_ad0s1_flags=-k
John Dworske [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Help me...yeah...OK...so here it goes...I am brand new to
FreeBSD...installed OS onto a box from
a set of floppies I got off the net...
Last login: Wed May 3 14:37:21 2006 from 10.10.20.20
Copyright (c) 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1990,
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seems on recent releng_6 (RC1) the permissions set to pass0
within /etc/devfs.conf are not applied anymore and need to be set
manual in order getting acd0 available to users
Works for me on FreeBSD 6.1-RC #1: Sun Apr 9 20:07:42 CEST 2006.
Did you by any
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 13 April 2006 09:28, Fabian Keil wrote:
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seems on recent releng_6 (RC1) the permissions set to pass0
within /etc/devfs.conf are not applied anymore and need to be set
manual in order getting acd0 available
Jonas Wolz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
while trying to get the gnash CVS version to work I noticed that on
my system (FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE) truss obviously has problems tracing
firefox: truss prints somewhat random error messages and traces
only some of the system calls firefox makes (opening a
Yousef Raffah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having an issue as I'm a newbie in installing/configuring the
marvell driver for FreeBSD.
A quick search in the mailing lists shows:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=2601224+2604070
Brian Candler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I Hvae an IBM Thinkpad X30 with a miniPCI wireless card:
wi0: Intersil Prism2.5 mem 0xf800-0xf8000fff irq 11 at device
2.0 on pci1 wi0: using RF:PRISM2.5 MAC:ISL3874A(Mini-PCI)
wi0: Intersil Firmware: Primary (1.1.0), Station (1.4.9)
wi0: Ethernet
Matt Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently upgraded a 4.11-REL machine to 6.0-REL and have run into
some snags. While the installation from CD went fine, after
configuring and enabling my ed0 NIC, bad things start to happen.
FWIW, this machine is an ancient (hardware circa 1991,
Carlos Amengual [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My system is a 6.1-PRERELEASE as of yesterday afternoon, but the same
happened with a RELENG_6 as of a month ago.
I set up a D-Link AirPlus DWL-520+ wireless PCI adapter in an old
server, and NDISwrapped it (got an AIRPLUS_SYS.ko).
When running
Adam Retter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FreeBSD funkalicious.home.dom 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #8:
Thu Feb 23 23:24:57 GMT 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/funkalicious i386
I have a fairly straight-forward kernel config (see below) I think, yet
if I enable device
Michael Schuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i use top mostly in idle-mode.
# top return i
or
# top -I
Under releng_6 (stable p4) and the older versions,
i think down to releng_5, doesn't show a running process.
By default top doesn't show system processes.
If you run top -I and no process is
Graham North [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am planning to load FreeBSD as a dual boot on new IBM laptop.
The model is an R51 which comes with:
Radeon 7500 - video
Intel Pro/1000 NT Mobile
Intel Pro/Wireless 2200BG
Integrated Audio
Intel 82802 UltraATA
Can anyone tell me whether the above
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Paul) wrote:
Is there a way I can provide more information?
You haven't said yet what manufacturer/model your access point is.
It's a Netgear WGT624 (Hardwareversion V3H1/Firmwareversion
V1.1.125_1.1.1GR).
I tried to associate ndis0 with wi0 in hostap mode and got
I fail to get the following device working since my update
from RELENG_5 to RELENG_6 a few days ago:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0: class=0x028000 card=0x27128086 chip=0x42208086 rev=0x05
hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device = 'PRO/Wireless 2200BG Network Connection'
class=
Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I fail to get the following device working since my update
from RELENG_5 to RELENG_6 a few days ago:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0: class=0x028000 card=0x27128086 chip=0x42208086
rev=0x05 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device = 'PRO/Wireless
Parv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Fabian Keil thusly...
Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I fail to get the following device working since my update
from RELENG_5 to RELENG_6 a few days ago:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0: class=0x028000 card
Parv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Fabian Keil thusly...
Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I fail to get the following device working since my update
from RELENG_5 to RELENG_6 a few days ago:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0: class=0x028000 card
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Paul) wrote:
I fail to get the following device working since my update
from RELENG_5 to RELENG_6 a few days ago:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0: class=0x028000 card=0x27128086 chip=0x42208086
rev=0x05 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device =
Kevin Oberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:32:08 +0100
From: Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since the update from RELENG_5 to RELENG_6 a few days ago I have
trouble with the wireless network.
This card worked fine with FreeBSD 5.4:
wi0: T-Sinus 130card
Since the update from RELENG_5 to RELENG_6 a few days ago I have
trouble with the wireless network.
This card worked fine with FreeBSD 5.4:
wi0: T-Sinus 130card at port 0x4000-0x403f irq 11 function 0 config 1
on pccard0
wi0: using RF:PRISM2.5 MAC:ISL3873
wi0: Intersil Firmware: Primary
Oliver Brandmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 04:30:31PM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote:
Oliver Brandmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm experiencing problems when trying to mount NFS filesystems
from a RELENG_6 server (FreeBSD hudson 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD
6.0-STABLE
Oliver Brandmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm experiencing problems when trying to mount NFS filesystems from a
RELENG_6 server (FreeBSD hudson 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE
#0: Wed Dec 14 16:59:55 CET 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NFS-32-FBSD6 i386)
to either
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 05:32:34PM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote:
I guess you're right. I can fill a 256MB swap-backed disk without
panic and without swapping.
FYI, this is documented in the manpage.
I think the panic potential should be mentioned
Morten A. Middelthon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just got this message after posting to freebsd-stable@freebsd.org:
Subject: Blogger post failed
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 05:32:36 -0800 (PST)
Blogger does not accept multipart/signed files.
I triggered a few reproducible panics on FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE.
I created a ramdisk with:
/sbin/mdconfig -a -t malloc -s 256M -u 10
/sbin/newfs -U /dev/md10
/sbin/mount /dev/md10 /mnt/ramdisk
The system has avail memory = 515932160 (492 MB)
and 1GB swap space.
While
Gleb Smirnoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:25:30PM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote:
F I triggered a few reproducible panics on FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE.
F
F I created a ramdisk with:
F
F /sbin/mdconfig -a -t malloc -s 256M -u 10
F /sbin/newfs -U /dev/md10
F
Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:25:30PM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote:
F I triggered a few reproducible panics on FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE.
F
F I created a ramdisk with:
F
F /sbin/mdconfig -a -t malloc -s 256M -u 10
F
Sam Leffler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Richard Arends wrote:
Today I upgraded my laptop from 5-STABLE to 6-STABLE. After the
upgrade, my wireless is not working anymore.
You are doing better than me. I try this:
ifconfig ath0 wepkey 12345
and get
Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 22:49, Fabian Keil wrote:
AFAIK, nobody has announced that the old way is death,
therefore I would like to know if the breakage is intentional
and if it is, if there's a technical reason why these methods
can no longer coexists
Hi all,
as you probably have noticed, the amount of mails about
problems with compiling ndis has increased in the last
four weeks.
The old way to compile ndis was to go to
/usr/src/sys/modules/if_ndis/, use ndiscvt to create a header
file containing the windows driver and to make;make install.
Hi list,
forwarding to freebsd-stable (probably the right place anyway),
since I got no further responses on freebsd-questions.
Subhro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/5/2005 19:43, Fabian Keil wrote:
the day before yesterday I experienced my first
panic on 5.4-STABLE. Build and cvsup'ed last
91 matches
Mail list logo