On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 10:41 AM Karl Denninger wrote:
> In this specific case the adapter in question is...
>
> mps0: port 0xc000-0xc0ff mem
> 0xfbb3c000-0xfbb3,0xfbb4-0xfbb7 irq 30 at device 0.0 on pci3
> mps0: Firmware: 20.00.07.00, Driver: 21.02.00.00-fbsd
> mps0:
I have a "Ghetto" home RAID array. It's built on compromises and makes use
of RAID-Z2 to survive. It consists of two plexes of 8x 4T units of
"spinning rust". It's been upgraded and upgraded. It started as 8x 2T,
then 8x 2T + 8x 4T then the current 16x 4T. The first 8 disks are
connected to
So... if I choose live CD and type "ifconfig em0 up" followed by "dhclient
em0" ... everything works... but if I go through the install, select
something that isn't on the media and continue, selecting em0 as my
network, and ipv4->DHCP ... I see "sendmeg on em0: No buffer space
available" ...
If
I just added a setkey for the reverse, and connections still do not happen.
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Mike Tancsa <m...@sentex.net> wrote:
> On 5/22/2017 3:24 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> > After upgrading to 11.1-PRERELEASE, none of my MD5 BGP connections are
> >
After upgrading to 11.1-PRERELEASE, none of my MD5 BGP connections are
coming up. They were fine in 11.0-RELEASE.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
The Sun Fire 4140 is a dual opteron machine. I'm getting BTX Halted and a
processor register dump right after it prints the /boot/config -Dp (nothing
else printed).
Is there any value in trying the -current boot files to boot the 10.3
host? Are they newer?
This happened as I tried to move the
? Isn't this just another race waiting for the the right set of
conditions?
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.comwrote:
Since there weren't any more ideas here, I tried turning off
hyper-threading. This is an old pentium-D type CPU --- that is: one core
with HT
made the problem go away.
That is not to say that the problem is fixed: it simply means that
replication may be tied to multiple CPUs and/or the allocation of resources
by an HT CPU core.
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com wrote:
The first one
napisana przez Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com w dniu 31
sie 2013, o godz. 00:49:
Because someone said that there would be no logging of unerlying ATA
errors without verbose, I rebooted with verbose and tried the same make -j4
again... and here is the relatively similar core.txt.5
https
- crash - single user - fsck - fsck again
-\
^-/
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.comwrote:
So I have a system
Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com w dniu
29 sie 2013, o godz. 23:35:
So I have a system running:
FreeBSD walk.dclg.ca 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 # r254952: Wed Aug 28
03:02:55
EDT 2013 r...@walk.dclg.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/STRIKE i386
and it has two 2T SATA disks. To keep
at it, gmirror is dropping the same error and the underlying
hardware is not causing the error...
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.comwrote:
My bad. New link for the core.txt.4:
https://uk.eicat.ca/owncloud/public.php?service=filest
So I have a system running:
FreeBSD walk.dclg.ca 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 # r254952: Wed Aug 28 03:02:55
EDT 2013 r...@walk.dclg.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/STRIKE i386
and it has two 2T SATA disks. To keep this post short, the crash.txt is
here.
[about double background NFS mounts]
I'm not sure on the fix to this, but I'm pretty sure it's because we retry
the mount -a stuff twice at startup. If you watch your console, you'll see
two places where it will mount NFS filesystems during boot.
... well... a fix to this would be to _not_ do
I've got an Intel server motherboard with 4x igb (and 1x em) on it.
The motherboard in question is the S3420GPRX and the IGB's show up as:
igb0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection version - 2.3.4 port
0x3020-0x303f mem 0xb1b2-0xb1b3,0xb1bc4000-0xb1bc7fff irq 19
at device 0.0 on pci3
A further update to my problem: it only seems to occur when there is
largely traffic out ie: the window is active with ... but typing in
the window seems to prevent the effect.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
To Jack Vogel's comment, this problem only seems to occur on systems
that are exceedingly lightly loaded (in this case, not yet in
production and I'm the only one using it).
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org wrote:
r243570 in CURRENT should likely fix this
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote:
Are you using pf ? Also, did you confirm it is the igb nic and not
something more general ? e.g. if you put in a different nic, does the
problem go away ?
No pf, the motherboard em-driver NIC does not have this problem.
In
It could do some good to think of the scale of the problem and maybe
the driver can tune to the hardware.
First, is 8k packet buffers a reasonable default on a GigE port?
Well... on a GigE port, you could have from 100k pps (packets per
second) at 1500 bytes to 500k pps at around 300 bytes to
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
So, this happens EVERY time after an install of 8.2 ??
Give me details about the hardware please.
Having had more time to experiment, it seems it happens whenever
ifconfig_em0=DHCP is in rc.conf --- which happens after using
The motherboard in question is made by Intel and contains a Xeon 3440
(4 core x 2 HT per core). 16 Gig of RAM is installed and we are
installing the 64 bit FreeBSD 8.2 using the PC-BSD installer (to
install zfs root faster). The motherboard has 4 igb ethernet and
one em ethernet. The em
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
Given that you're running 8.1-RELEASE, what sort of ZFS tunings are you
using in /boot/loader.conf? Tuning is required on this version
I haven't seen any new tuning recommendations. Has the tuning
required on an
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Pete French petefre...@ticketswitch.com wrote:
I am not burning a CD or using any physical media. I am booting
directly off the image file using iLO. Hence the stuff in that thread
doesnt apply. It's defintely 8 specific - I can boot an mage
from 7 it works
[regarding getting more disks in a machine]
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
You need an HP SAS expander card in the new box, and an HBA in your primary
box with external ports to hook it into.
Then the drives in the other box will show up as local drives on
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 04:56:04PM -0400, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
With 1.5T disks, I find that the 4 to 1 multipliers have a small
effect on speed. The 4 drives I have on the multipler are saturated
at 100
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Xin LI delp...@delphij.net wrote:
On 2010/01/27 11:18, Paul Mather wrote:
I have a FreeBSD guest running under VirtualBox 3.1.2 on Mac OS X. It's
running a recent 8-STABLE and is a ZFS-only install booting via gptzfsboot.
I use this VirtualBox guest as a
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.auwrote:
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Pim Bliek wrote:
Anyone any suggestions on this issue? I did a lot of Google... but
did not find anything usefull beyond this point. Seems this works on
Linux with Wine, but no clues for
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote:
At 04:07 PM 12/4/2009, K. Macy wrote:
If you have a large number of routes then you will want to disable the
flowtable.
Thanks! I will remove from boxes that act as routers / large firewalls.
However, the high load avg is
I'm still investigating this, but my quagga is locking hard on FreeBSD 8.0
and not locking hard on 7.2. It seems (at this early point in the
investigation) that both bgpd and zebra are wedging and zebra is listed as
being in the RUN state.
curiously, the load is also 4.0 (exactly the number of
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
This 1950 may predate that a bit, but I'm not sure
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote:
This 1950 may predate that a bit, but I'm not sure how to nail it down
exactly, other than by it's hardware components. Anyways, 7.0 does the
same
thing --- still wedged.
I haven't seen anyone recommend
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com
wrote:
This 1950 may predate that a bit, but I'm not sure how to nail it down
exactly, other than by it's hardware components. Anyways
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Richard Tector
richardtec...@thekeelecentre.com wrote:
Can you try with 7.0 (should be available on ftp-archive)?
I can confirm that 7.0 exhibits the same behaviour (and is incidentally very
chatty about probing the raid controller)
I have a 1950 from Sept
I have a dell 1950 here on the floor. Since 1950 seems to refer to a lot
of things with a lot of configurations, I'm going to attempt to narrow that
down a bit.
It's got 2x 2.33Ghz dual core pentiums (stepping 06-0F-6 according to the
bios) in it and it has an SAS RAID card that FreeBSD
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.comwrote:
fdc0: floppy drive controller port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on
acpi0
fdc0: does not respond
device_attach: fdc0 attach returned 6
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
Recording data DVDs worked a few weeks/months ago on this system with a
PATA Lite-On DVD recorder:
FreeBSD lightning 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #0: Sun Sep 20 07:25:58 MDT
2009
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Richard Mahlerwein mahle...@yahoo.comwrote:
I have had several exhibit behavior even more odd.
The most unusual was this particular CD writer... It read both DVDs and CDs
but would write neither (it had worked fine the week before). I took it out
of the
Did we change something in the routing socket's datagram between 7.0 and
7.2? I have a binary I compiled on 7.0-RELEASE and it fails to add a route
on 7.2. If I recompile the source on 7.2, it works. Roughly put, the code
make a datagram for the route socket like this:
bzero(rtmsg,
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Aristedes Maniatis a...@ish.com.au wrote:
On 31/05/2009, at 4:41 AM, Dan Naumov wrote:
To top that
off, even when/if you do it right, not your entire disk goes to ZFS
anyway, because you still do need a swap and a /boot to be non-ZFS, so
you will have to
2009/5/18 Михаил Кипа msnk...@mail.ru
I have two servers with Identical FreeBSD7.2 system. On both I have such
config in /etc/rc.conf:
rpcbind_enable=YES
rpc_lockd_enable=YES
rpc_statd_enable=YES
nfs_client_enable=YES
nfs_server_enable=YES
nfs_server_flags=-u -t -n 5 -h 192.168.x.y
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Michel Di Croci
michel.dicr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
One of my ex colleague wanna startup a web project. I'm still unsure about
[...]
However what I want to know here is how much could handle this server as a
standalone? How many requests at the same time
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Andrei Kolu an...@bsd.ee wrote:
I forgot to try ZFS on that particular server- maybe that one would be
better alternative? I have experience with ZFS on terabyte sized volumes and
had no ill effects so far- what about really large filesystems? I know that
ZFS
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Pete French petefre...@ticketswitch.comwrote:
on any request to previously mounted FS. On UFS, mounted NFS file systems
survive server reboots...
Are you sure anout that ? I have a lot of systems sharing files using UFS
and I see the 'stale NFS file handle'
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Edvaldo Silva
e...@americanadigital.com.brwrote:
Hello, guys!
Please, can someone point a NIC, PCI 2.2 specs, full VLAN capable under
FreeBSD?
I´m finding terrible issues using RTL8169 and 3C9x, almost all for the
fact NIC cannot handle MTU a little bigger
I've got an HP DL-360 1U here that has a slim SATA CDROM. I've (so far)
tried booting FreeBSD-7.0-RELEASE and FreeBSD-7.1-BETA2. I've tried both
rewritable media (my first choice) and write-once media. The kernel loads
fine, but multiuser fails with acd0: TIMEOUT - READ_BIG retrying ...
twice,
In several of the recent ZFS posts, multiple people have asked when this
will be MFC'd to 7.x. This query has been studiously ignored as other
chatter about whatever ZFS issue is discussed.
So in a post with no other bug report or discussion content to distract us,
when is it intended that ZFS
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Paul B. Mahol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/22/08, Zaphod Beeblebrox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In several of the recent ZFS posts, multiple people have asked when this
will be MFC'd to 7.x. This query has been studiously ignored as other
chatter about
I don't know whether or not this has been fixed, but I found that I had to
recompile tcpslice and/or tcpdump to deal with files larger than 4 gig (or
maybe 2 gig). I suppose it's a better situation than wireshark. After a
few million packets, it falls over because it makes the widgets in the
Someone posted something like this earlier...
[3:6:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/u/dgilbert zpool attach canoe ad8s4d ad4s3d
Assertion failed: (èQ), function rv == 0, file
/canoe/64/usr/src/cddl/sbin/zpool/../../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/zpool/zpool_vdev.c,
line 131.
Abort trap: 6 (core dumped)
...
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 03:18:01PM -0200, JoaoBR wrote:
On Monday 20 October 2008 15:03:14 Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Oct 20, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Hm... I thought we determined earlier in this
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:16 AM, Andrew Snow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, as a core general purpose filesystem, it seems to have flaws, not
the least of which is a re-separation of file cache and memory cache.
For me, this doesn't matter because ZFS is so much faster than UFS
overall.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I certainly can't agree with this. I don't think you're measuring the
performance of the machine --- only measuring the performance of the
filesystem. When ZFS is active, memory is committed in the kernel to ZFS
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Derek Kuliński [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ZFS is the first filesystem, to my knowledge, which provides 1) a
reliable filesystem, 2) detection of filesystem problems in real-time or
during scrubbing, 3) repair of problems in real-time (assuming raidz1 or
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:30:01PM -0400, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
However, as a core general purpose filesystem, it seems to have flaws,
not
the least of which is a re-separation of file cache and memory cache
I have a 1950-III 1U on the floor here that I'm loading. After configuring
IPMI in the BIOS, I can:
[2:6:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ ipmitool -I lanplus -U root -H 192.168.221.160 shell
Password:
ipmitool power on
Chassis Power Control: Up/On
Now. strike is not the 1U in question... and does not, in
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Bob Bishop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only problem I have seen on em is that by default the driver resets the
phy during boot which confuses IPMI; if a SOL console session is active, the
driver is signalled not to do the reset.
Same here. The 1950-III
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Daniel Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am having problems with silent data corruption on (some) drives
connected to an MCP55 SATA controller.
I have an MCP55 controller here running most of my RAID array. When I
origionally loaded this machine, I had
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Andrew Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but what struck me as odd is the desire to create two separate zpools - one
for data storage and one for the system. i think one of zfs's greatest
strengths is the abstraction/separation between disks and filesystems.
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Freddie Cash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 20, 2008 12:08 pm Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
On 18 May Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
However, when using Norton Ghost to make backup snapshots, the files
(on ZFS) come out corrupt. They are not corrupt on UFS backed
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Marc UBM Bocklet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2008 00:26:49 -0400
Pierre-Luc Drouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to know if the memory allocation problem with zfs has
been fixed in -stable? Is zfs considered to be more stable now?
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:02 AM, Andrew Snow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete French wrote:
I did some benchmarking, and load gives me a bit better performance
than
round-robin so I've elected to use that. Haven't tried prefer as
syncing all the drives backwards and forwards to get the
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In the end we found that ggate was crashy after a week or two of heavy
use,
too... dispite it's performance problems (which can be somewhat fixed by
telling gmirror to only read from the local disk)
That last part
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 7:18 AM, Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am trying to run a system with a pair of drives mirrored under
gmirror, one of thhem being local and the other remote using ggated.
I have experimented with this rather extensively and have operationally
decided not to
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have experimented with this rather extensively and have operationally
decided not to use ggated in combination with gmirror --- it doesn't
appear
to work as well as one might expect.
Ah, thats unmfortunate :-( I
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:45 AM, Lev Serebryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, freebsd-stable.
Does somebody use some software RAID5 on FreeBSD in real production
system?
I want to build storage server for my home: RAW photos, multi-layer
PhotoShop files and FLAC-encoded music consume
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Bruce M. Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are switch ASICs out there which implement upstream bandwidth
limiting on ports by sending the PAUSE frame.
I believe thompsa@ recently committed a fix to if_bridge to allow it to
ignore PAUSE frames for the
Now that 7.0 has been cut, any chance that the uchcom driver could be MFC'd?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 19, 2008 5:10 PM, Kevin K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a box that we recently installed 16GB of RAM on. The box is i386
FreeBSD 6.2. It only recognizes 4gb.
Siding with most of the group (go amd64), I'll add my own comment:
Using PAE to access 4G of RAM (because 4G shows up as
On Feb 7, 2008 1:54 PM, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having trouble with kevent() in connection with UDP sockets
(6.2-STABLE).
Registering an event seems to work, but when UDP packet arrives on the
socket, kevent returns with 0.
Is there currently a working support for UDP sockets
On Feb 4, 2008 10:31 PM, Ganbold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having trouble mounting external NTFS hard drive using fusefs-ntfs
port on Dell Latitude D620.
I havn't seen this specific problem, but on my Dell XPS 1730
(core-2-duo-extreme) The NTFS-3g mounts doen't seem to shutdown properly.
Nobody's said what the problem is. I'm not a filesystem code monkey, but
IIRC, the problem is that the filesystem plays fast and loose with pointers
and is too closely related to the VM.
One solution is (as mentioned) a userland filesystem that doesn't panic.
automount approximates this if you
One thing I would like to see is a list of favoured non-raid multiport cards
that are not dumb. We have a server running a rocket RAID controller
(largely to get 8 ports of SATA). It doesn't do hot swap, it doesn't do
SMART and I'm beginning to believe it might occasionally corrupt sectors
On 6/19/06, Todor Dragnev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, I will use if_bridge from now.
Anyone have ideas about second problem? Maybe I must remove device usb
from GENERIC config and recompile kernel ?
This really is an FAQ. There are many ways. You can use the
device.hintsfile to tie
On 6/12/06, Ulrich Spoerlein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Björn König wrote:
I did a mistake: I unplugged my digital camera accidentally before I
unmounted the
filesystem. *doh* This happens very often, because I'm very
scatterbrained. =) The kernel
will panic and all filesystems remain
[nfsd's and other processes locking in 'D' state]
One thing I've seen cause this kind of thing is a disk that needs to be
manually fsck'd. Try bringing up the system in single user and manually
fsck'ing the volume. I have no idea what causes this kind of state ---
where the disk is bad, but
Note that problems with lsof are generally fixed by recompiling it. It
doesn't take well to upgrades of the OS underneath it.
On 6/7/06, Michael Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:20:03AM -0700, pete wright wrote:
On 6/6/06, Darren Pilgrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/5/06, Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damian Gerow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've often wondered why dhclient.conf doesn't have an 'ignore'
directive.
There's a 'require' in there; it doesn't seem like much of a stretch to
'ignore' something.
Why not just write a simple script
My method has always been to use cdrecord with atapicam. cdrecord will
accept .wav files and do the right thing on its own.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any
On 4/10/06, Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
metoo
I can't comment on gigabit performance but at Fast Ethernet speeds,
I've found that fxp performs much better than dc, tl and tx NICs.
I've had fairly bad experiences with bge under even moderate load
(though the one in my laptop seems
If you have a dual-em card in this server, you should get better performance
putting your primary load out the em interface(s). In general, we've
benched the em (and to a lesser extent, the fxp) interfaces as performing
much better than other ethernets (especially bge). I have a bge on my
laptop
On 2/9/06, Doug White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about 'fdisk da0'? :)
That's only bad when it actually decides to do something :).
I have a usb drive that takes a while to become ready after being
inserted. It initially generates errors when attempting to access it.
Yours may have a
On 2/10/06, Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Concerning the SCSI and CAM code I'm not an expert, but I
think it should be possible to nudge devfs when a rescan
has detected a new device.
You'd think, but no. You see, the device , according to CAM, doesn't
change. Magically, it has
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 07:58:53 -0500, Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 05:55 AM 16/11/2004, Marc UBM Bocklet wrote:
Hiho! :-)
What is the current status of ehci(4) in 5.3-stable, i.e. what are my
chances that if I buy cheap 3.5 external usb 2.0 case it will just or
probably work?
I'm in the uncomfortable position of needing to setstate down a gvinum
drive. I can't seem to effect this as the gvinum command doesn't
understand setstate (even though it proclaims that it does in gvinum
help).
Is there a way of making this so?
___
I'm looking at gstat while fsck'ing a gvinum partition. The trouble
I'm seeing is that I don't see activity on the second disk. Now...
I'm using fsck -n ... just checking things ... so there's no writes,
but does gvinum not (yet) load balance on reads?
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 01:26:54 -0500, Paul Mather [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your observation is correct: it doesn't (yet) load balance across plexes
of mirrored volumes; geom_mirror (gmirror) does, though (and offers
various load-balancing options).
Is this something planned for the near future?
86 matches
Mail list logo
