UP FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #0: Fri Jun 2 13:44:52 EEST 2006
-- cut here --
(kgdb) bt full
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165
No locals.
#1 0xc0579530 in boot (howto=260) at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:409
first_buf_printf = 1
#2 0xc0579ac3 in panic (
fmt=0xc0744d44 vm_page_unwire: invalid
On Tue, 2006-May-23 19:04:18 +, Hunter Fuller wrote:
Am I the only one who sees the oxymoronity in 6.1-stable crash?
Hopefully.
As is regularly pointed out, 'stable' refers primarily to the ABI.
FreeBSD 6.1-stable is still under active development, though only
code that has previously been
On 24 May 2006, at 7:28 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Tue, 2006-May-23 19:04:18 +, Hunter Fuller wrote:
Am I the only one who sees the oxymoronity in 6.1-stable crash?
Hopefully.
As is regularly pointed out, 'stable' refers primarily to the ABI.
I was just trying to make people chuckle
On 5/12/06, Vlad GALU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Just for the record, this has just happened again.
--
If it's there, and you can see it, it's real.
If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual.
If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent.
If it's not there, and you can't
Am I the only one who sees the oxymoronity in 6.1-stable crash?
On 23 May 2006, at 11:53 AM, Vlad GALU wrote:
On 5/12/06, Vlad GALU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Just for the record, this has just happened again.
--
If it's there, and you can see it, it's real.
If it's
FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #0: Mon May 8 08:07:42 EEST 2006
-- cut here --
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165
No locals.
#1 0xc05790a4 in boot (howto=260) at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:402
first_buf_printf = 1
#2 0xc05796b9 in panic (fmt=0xc072598e %s) at
../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:558
