Re: Disappointed-new

2006-04-10 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Sun, 2006-Apr-09 17:56:51 -0400, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: If you have a dual-em card in this server, you should get better performance putting your primary load out the em interface(s). In general, we've benched the em (and to a lesser extent, the fxp) interfaces as performing much better than

Re: Disappointed-new

2006-04-10 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On 4/10/06, Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: metoo I can't comment on gigabit performance but at Fast Ethernet speeds, I've found that fxp performs much better than dc, tl and tx NICs. I've had fairly bad experiences with bge under even moderate load (though the one in my laptop seems

Re: Disappointed-new

2006-04-09 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
If you have a dual-em card in this server, you should get better performance putting your primary load out the em interface(s). In general, we've benched the em (and to a lesser extent, the fxp) interfaces as performing much better than other ethernets (especially bge). I have a bge on my laptop

Re: Disappointed-new

2006-04-09 Thread Scott Long
Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: If you have a dual-em card in this server, you should get better performance putting your primary load out the em interface(s). In general, we've benched the em (and to a lesser extent, the fxp) interfaces as performing much better than other ethernets (especially

Re: Disappointed-new

2006-04-08 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 08:14 AM 07/04/2006, Albert Shih wrote: The 6-stable is installed on the server on begin of February 2006 Problems : bge0 watchdog timeout problems bge0 watchdog timeout problems There have been a number of improvements to the bge driver in late

Disappointed-new

2006-04-07 Thread Albert Shih
Hi all I've sent a message two days ago with Disappointed subject. Many of you answer me I don't have describe the bug. Well, first my english is very bad, and second I don't blame anyone, never the developper. Personnaly I'm very impresse by the work you doing. Now a fine description of my