On 11/11/2007, [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If a binary/library that is currently used gets removed/replaced, it will be
copied to memory. The process will not even recognize this. Only restarting
the process will remove the old version from memory and cause the new one to
be used.
Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 11/11/2007, [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If a binary/library that is currently used gets removed/replaced, it will be
copied to memory. The process will not even recognize this. Only restarting
the process will remove the old version from memory and cause the
In general, is it possible that the installkernel did /not/ complete
correctly before I shut down? Is it ever possible that the machine could
get put into an indeterminate state when doing installkernel on a running
machine? HP-UX used to behave horribly when a binary got clobbered for a
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Well, in this case after running 'make installkernel' and rebooting, the
system did not come back up because it got kernel fatals on reboot (fatal
trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode). It appears that my filesystems
got marked dirty in the
On Nov 04, Robert Watson wrote:
When I upgrade a remote systems, I'll actually almost always run a few
days with the new kernel and the old user space to make sure everything
has settled nicely before doing the user space upgrade, which is harder
to revert. Reverting to an old kernel is easy,
Clint Olsen wrote:
I just attempted a source upgrade from 5.5-STABLE to 6.3-PRERELEASE, and it
was a disaster, more than likely because I forgot to do something.
Normally I'm saved by the fact that the operations are not so scary as to
cause problems.
Well, in this case after running 'make
On Friday 02 November 2007 05:29:03 am Clint Olsen wrote:
On Nov 02, LI Xin wrote:
So we get:
- 5.5-STABLE works well on your box
- 6.2-RELEASE stock GENERIC works fine
- 6.3-PRERELEASE failed for some reason.
So far as I am aware I have no clue why this could happen. Could you
On 11/2/07, Clint Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just attempted a source upgrade from 5.5-STABLE to 6.3-PRERELEASE, and it
Well, in this case after running 'make installkernel' and rebooting,
Did you reboot in single user?
--
Cris, member of G.U.F.I
Italian FreeBSD User Group
On Nov 02, LI Xin wrote:
So we get:
- 5.5-STABLE works well on your box
- 6.2-RELEASE stock GENERIC works fine
- 6.3-PRERELEASE failed for some reason.
So far as I am aware I have no clue why this could happen. Could you
check if you have any special configuration in your
Clint Olsen wrote:
I just attempted a source upgrade from 5.5-STABLE to 6.3-PRERELEASE, and it
was a disaster, more than likely because I forgot to do something.
Normally I'm saved by the fact that the operations are not so scary as to
cause problems.
[... restore old kernel worked; new kernel
I just attempted a source upgrade from 5.5-STABLE to 6.3-PRERELEASE, and it
was a disaster, more than likely because I forgot to do something.
Normally I'm saved by the fact that the operations are not so scary as to
cause problems.
Well, in this case after running 'make installkernel' and
11 matches
Mail list logo
