on 01/07/2013 21:50 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
The issue is that ZFS on FreeBSD is still young compared to other
filesystems (specifically UFS).
That's a fact.
Nothing is perfect, but FFS/UFS tends
to have a significantly larger number of bugs worked out of it to the
point where
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 08:59:56AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 01/07/2013 21:50 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
The issue is that ZFS on FreeBSD is still young compared to other
filesystems (specifically UFS).
That's a fact.
Nothing is perfect, but FFS/UFS tends
to have a
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 12:57:16AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
But in the OP's case, the situation sounds dire given the limitations --
limitations that someone (apparently not him) chose, which greatly
hinder debugging/troubleshooting. Had a heterogeneous setup been
chosen, the
Hello,
I have not had much time to research this problem yet, so please let me
know what further information I might be able to provide.
This weekend I attempted to upgrade a computer from 8.2-RELEASE-p3 to 8.4
using freebsd-update. After I rebooted to test the new kernel, I got a
panic. I had
*** Sorry for partial first message! (gmail sent after multiple returns
apparently?) ***
Hello,
I have not had much time to research this problem yet, so please let me
know what further information I might be able to provide.
This weekend I attempted to upgrade a computer from 8.2-RELEASE-p3 to
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 11:35:30AM -0400, Scott Sipe wrote:
*** Sorry for partial first message! (gmail sent after multiple returns
apparently?) ***
Hello,
I have not had much time to research this problem yet, so please let me
know what further information I might be able to provide.
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 08:49:25AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
- Is there a reason you do not have dumpdev defined in /etc/rc.conf (or
alternately, no swap device defined in /etc/fstab (which will get
used/honoured by the dumpdev=auto (the default)) ?
This should have read or
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org
To: Scott Sipe csco...@gmail.com
Cc: freebsd-stable List freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 4:49 PM
Subject: Re: ZFS Panic after freebsd-update
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 11:35:30AM -0400, Scott Sipe wrote
On Jul 1, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 11:35:30AM -0400, Scott Sipe wrote:
*** Sorry for partial first message! (gmail sent after multiple returns
apparently?) ***
Hello,
I have not had much time to research this problem yet, so please
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:23:45PM -0400, Paul Mather wrote:
On Jul 1, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 11:35:30AM -0400, Scott Sipe wrote:
*** Sorry for partial first message! (gmail sent after multiple returns
apparently?) ***
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:23:45PM -0400, Paul Mather wrote:
On Jul 1, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org wrote:
Of course when I see lines like this:
Trying to mount root from zfs:zroot
on 01/07/2013 20:04 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
People are operating with the belief that ZFS just
works, when reality shows it works until it doesn't
That reality applies to everything that a man creates with a purpose to work.
I am not sure why you are so over-focused on ZFS.
Please
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 02:04:24PM -0400, Scott Sipe wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:23:45PM -0400, Paul Mather wrote:
On Jul 1, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org wrote:
Of course when I see
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 09:10:45PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 01/07/2013 20:04 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
People are operating with the belief that ZFS just
works, when reality shows it works until it doesn't
That reality applies to everything that a man creates with a purpose
- Original Message -
From: Scott Sipe csco...@gmail.com
So I realize that neither 8.2-RELEASE or 8.4-RELEASE are stable, but I
ultimately wasn't sure where the right place to go for discuss 8.4 is?
Beyond the FS mailing list, was there a better place for my question? I'll
provide the
Am 01.07.2013 um 20:56 schrieb Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk:
- Original Message - From: Scott Sipe csco...@gmail.com
So I realize that neither 8.2-RELEASE or 8.4-RELEASE are stable, but I
ultimately wasn't sure where the right place to go for discuss 8.4 is?
Beyond the FS
On Jul 1, 2013, at 19:04, Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org wrote:
But even stable/X doesn't provide enough coverage at times (the recent
fxp(4)/dhclient issue is proof of that). It's just too bad so many
people have this broken mindset of what stability means on FreeBSD.
As one of the few
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/01/13 09:10, Steven Hartland wrote:
[...]
This says your running a 8.2-RELEASE-p3 kernel not an 8.4-RELEASE
kernel.
Did the upgrade fail or is that dmesg / uname from your old
kernel?
Looking at the context, he used freebsd-update to
18 matches
Mail list logo
