On Apr 8, 2009, at 12:18 PM, Christian Walther wrote:
I used geli encrypted ZFS including Root on my IBM Thinkpad T31 with
1GB RAM on a 160GB HDD. (i386 7-STABLE)
Swap on a dedicated slice. Some Z Filesystems used compression
(/usr/ports, /usr/src, for example).
I encountered several crashes,
On Apr 8, 2009, at 5:59 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Rsync is used for snapshots with --link-dest= (each day has own
directory and all unchenged files are hardlinked to previous day and
I have history of two month back).
Backups are stored on /vol0 with compression enabled. (compression
is
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 22:35:06 +0200, Lorenzo Perone
lopez.on.the.li...@yellowspace.net wrote:
trying to understand now if
7.2 is worth a new try, or if, for that matter, the only reasonable
wait is until 8.0.
The deadlock issues should be fixed with ZFS v.13 which is only available
in
I think most if not all of the gains are from increasing the maximum
tcp socket buffer sizes.
You might test it out with only those to confirm.
-Kip
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Antony Mawer fbsd-sta...@mawer.org wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
2009/4/8 Miroslav Lachman 000.f...@quip.cz:
(Lighttpd problem may be related to jail instead of ZFS - I did not test it
yet)
Completely unrelated to ZFS, but wasn't there some issue with lighttpd
and sendfile() relatively recently (sendfile is the default)? Have you
tried
Hi,
in one production case (1), haven't seen panics or deadlocks for a
long time, yet on another much more powerful machine (2), I could not
get rid of vm_thread_new: kstack allocation failed, ultimately
rendering the machine useless pretty fast. This was at least till
RELENG_7/november
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Antony Mawer fbsd-sta...@mawer.org wrote:
Freddie Cash wrote:
...
We've also heavily modified /etc/sysctl.conf and upped a bunch of the
network-related sysctls. Doing so increased our SSH throughput from ~30
Mbits/sec across all connections to over 90
Hi,
I've been pinged by two people already that it's possible that the
problems listed at:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSKnownProblems
have been fixed in 7-STABLE, and that the page needs to be significantly
revised to sound less scary. Since I unfortunately don't have any ZFS
systems in
Ivan Voras wrote:
* Are the issues on the list still there?
* Are there any new issues?
* Is somebody running ZFS in production (non-trivial loads) with
success? What architecture / RAM / load / applications used?
* How is your memory load? (does it leave enough memory for other services)
My account:
amd64 stable/7 system
4GB RAM
zero tuning
3-way mirrored zpool with individual dev size about 400G
moderate load
sufficient remaining RAM (still plenty)
zero troubles (system age is 2 months)
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Ivan Voras wrote:
Hi,
I've been pinged by two people already that it's possible that the
problems listed at:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSKnownProblems
have been fixed in 7-STABLE, and that the page needs to be significantly
revised to sound less scary. Since I unfortunately don't have
Hi,
I used geli encrypted ZFS including Root on my IBM Thinkpad T31 with
1GB RAM on a 160GB HDD. (i386 7-STABLE)
Swap on a dedicated slice. Some Z Filesystems used compression
(/usr/ports, /usr/src, for example).
I encountered several crashes, especially during heavy loads, such as
compiling big
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:50:33PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
* Are the issues on the list still there?
* Are there any new issues?
* Is somebody running ZFS in production (non-trivial loads) with
success? What architecture / RAM / load / applications used?
* How is
On April 8, 2009 5:30 am Ivan Voras wrote:
snip
Specifically:
* Are the issues on the list still there?
* Are there any new issues?
* Is somebody running ZFS in production (non-trivial loads) with
success? What architecture / RAM / load / applications used?
* How is your memory load? (does
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Ivan Voras wrote:
IV * Are the issues on the list still there?
IV * Are there any new issues?
IV * Is somebody running ZFS in production (non-trivial loads) with
IV success? What architecture / RAM / load / applications used?
IV * How is your memory load? (does it leave
My home fileserver:
Started using zfs around 7.0-BETA2, oct-nov 07.
The system is running 7-sta...@amd64, updated once a month.
4GB RAM
No kmem-tuning.
4x320gb, switched to 5x750 during the summer.
No panics after switching from i386 to amd64.
___
Ivan Voras wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
* Are the issues on the list still there?
* Are there any new issues?
* Is somebody running ZFS in production (non-trivial loads) with
success? What architecture / RAM / load / applications used?
* How is your memory load? (does it leave enough memory for
2009/4/8 Miroslav Lachman 000.f...@quip.cz:
(Lighttpd problem may be related to jail instead of ZFS - I did not test it
yet)
Completely unrelated to ZFS, but wasn't there some issue with lighttpd
and sendfile() relatively recently (sendfile is the default)? Have you
tried
Freddie Cash wrote:
...
We've also heavily modified /etc/sysctl.conf and upped a bunch of the
network-related sysctls. Doing so increased our SSH throughput from ~30
Mbits/sec across all connections to over 90 Mbits/sec per SSH connection.
Are you able to share any of these with the list? It
Ivan Voras wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
* Are the issues on the list still there?
* Are there any new issues?
* Is somebody running ZFS in production (non-trivial loads) with
success? What architecture / RAM / load / applications used?
* How is your memory load? (does it leave enough memory for
20 matches
Mail list logo
