On 2006-05-01 16:04, Mikhail Teterin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I direct someone's attention to the annoying but easy to fix bug:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=gnu/96570
There are still a few days left to make sure, FreeBSD-6.1 is shipped with
amd64 being able to link
I tend to get snippy towards the end of release cycles, and I apologize
to those I've offended or have been needlessly rude to. But please hear
me out on what I have to say here
...
The release process is about balancing the need to get it done with
the need to get it as good as
On Tue, 2006-May-02 00:04:14 +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 05:39:02PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
...
create 32-bit executables. Thus created lame, for example (from the
audio/lame port) works and happily converts mp3 files (using
assembler-optimized routines available
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 02:22, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
= cc can build binaries just fine if you also use the -B option:
=
= % cc -m32 -B/usr/lib32 ...
Yes, this is a work-around. It is not a solution... /usr/lib32 should be there
automatically.
= I know it does because I've used it on
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 05:59, Peter Jeremy wrote:
= But probably not as fast since it's using a generic 'C' core instead
= of a hand-tweaked assembler core. I read Mikhail's comment as meaning
= that it is possible to build non-trivial 32-bit executables on amd64,
= there's just work still needed
workaround i use: 32-bit jail on amd64 system ... not so bad ...
2006/5/2, Mikhail Teterin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 05:59, Peter Jeremy wrote:
= But probably not as fast since it's using a generic 'C' core instead
= of a hand-tweaked assembler core. I read Mikhail's comment as
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 11:04:32PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
While it's always unfortunate and undesirable to have bugs in releases
or have missing features, it's even more undesirable to hold releases
indefinitely until all the problems are solved.
Even the most cursory review of GNATS will
Can I direct someone's attention to the annoying but easy to fix bug:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=gnu/96570
There are still a few days left to make sure, FreeBSD-6.1 is shipped with
amd64 being able to link 32-bit executables.
Release Engineers insist, it must be fixed
Sorry incase any of you else are interested. Read Below.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sean Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 1, 2006 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: cc can't build 32-bit executables on amd64
To: Mikhail Teterin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
add the flag -B/usr/lib32 and -B/usr/local
понеділок 01 травень 2006 17:25, Paul Allen написав:
This was originally mentioned in amd64/76224 which was closed by obrien
with the terse remark: We don't yet support building 32-bit apps on a
64-bit system. We only barely support *running* them at this point.
I may be missing something
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 05:39:02PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
snip
I may be missing something huge, but, it seems to me, that my little
patch is sufficient to point cc to the right direction. With it I can
create 32-bit executables. Thus created lame, for example (from the
audio/lame port)
Mikhail Teterin wrote:
понеділок 01 травень 2006 17:25, Paul Allen написав:
This was originally mentioned in amd64/76224 which was closed by obrien
with the terse remark: We don't yet support building 32-bit apps on a
64-bit system. We only barely support *running* them at this point.
I may
понеділок 01 травень 2006 18:55, Jonathan Noack написав:
Did you miss the previous reply which mentioned using '-B/usr/lib32
-B/usr/local/lib32' in addition to '-m32'?
I did not miss this work-around. But it is not a proper way -- one need not
specify -B/usr/lib in the 64-bit case. Nor should
Then why not work on adding the functionality? I'm sure freebsd people
would love to have a proper working 32 bit compatibility layer
happening.
On 5/1/06, Mikhail Teterin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
понеділок 01 травень 2006 18:55, Jonathan Noack написав:
Did you miss the previous reply which
понеділок 01 травень 2006 19:25, Sean Bryant написав:
The gcc's multilib.h functionality is just for that. [...]
Then why not work on adding the functionality? I'm sure freebsd people
would love to have a proper working 32 bit compatibility layer
happening.
Did you see the PR -- with the
Paul Allen wrote:
This was originally mentioned in amd64/76224 which was closed by obrien with the
terse remark: We don't yet support building 32-bit apps on a 64-bit system. We
only barely support *running* them at this point.
Really this deserves an errata mention at the very least. It just
I tend to get snippy towards the end of release cycles, and I apologize
to those I've offended or have been needlessly rude to. But please hear
me out on what I have to say here
What makes a release cycle stressful is not the bug tracking and fixing,
or the building of bits, or anything
17 matches
Mail list logo
