On 2007-Jun-19 02:58:20 -0400, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:39:22PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
I was asking about nullfs because the following lines
in sys/conf/NOTES:
# NB: The NULL, PORTAL, UMAP and UNION filesystems are known to be
# buggy, and WILL
On 6/21/07, Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-Jun-19 02:58:20 -0400, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:39:22PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
I was asking about nullfs because the following lines
in sys/conf/NOTES:
# NB: The NULL, PORTAL, UMAP and UNION
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:49:16PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
On 6/21/07, Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-Jun-19 02:58:20 -0400, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:39:22PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
I was asking about nullfs because the following
On 6/21/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:49:16PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
On 6/21/07, Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-Jun-19 02:58:20 -0400, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:39:22PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:59:31AM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
On 6/21/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:49:16PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
On 6/21/07, Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-Jun-19 02:58:20 -0400, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 19 June 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote:
I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering
if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment?
My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw.
Is this still the case?
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
I've been using r/w nullfs in production for
On 6/19/07, Josh Paetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 19 June 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote:
I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering
if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment?
My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw.
Is this still the case?
Regards,
Rong-En
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:39:22PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
On 6/19/07, Josh Paetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 19 June 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote:
I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering
if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment?
My impression is that ro nullfs
I use it all the time for compiles on top of nfs
On 6/18/07, Rong-en Fan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering
if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment?
My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw.
Is this still the case?
Regards,
Rong-En
Rong-en Fan wrote:
I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering
if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment?
My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw.
Is this still the case?
I've been using a r/w nullfs for the last several months with no issues.
Granted, I don't do a
Rong-en Fan wrote:
I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering
if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment?
My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw.
Is this still the case?
nullfs is quite stable from my impression at least for my workload. We
use it for some heavily
I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering
if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment?
My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw.
Is this still the case?
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
12 matches
Mail list logo
