Adrian Chadd wrote:
I'm talking to someone about it who has some patches against -current.
We'll see what can be done.
Thankfully! The solution for FreeBSD looks doable without having to
keep NAT state like TPROXY does..
Adrian
just want to how's the progress regarding this issue.
TIA
zen wrote:
Adrian Chadd wrote:
I'm talking to someone about it who has some patches against -current.
We'll see what can be done.
Thankfully! The solution for FreeBSD looks doable without having to
keep NAT state like TPROXY does..
Adrian
sorry double post
just want to _Know_ how's
real transparent proxy provided by Cisco's WCCP with, for example, Squid.
this protocol detects HTTP (and so on) traffic on any port and redirects it
to proxy-server.
same thing (not just permanent redirection of port 80 to proxy but
*DETECTING* HTTP traffic and proxying it) can be achived by
On 12/23/-58 20:59, zen wrote:
i don't have a problem with this but i am going to be setting up a
similar setup and would appreciate the help a working setup would
provide.
any help will be appreciated, i could use a sample configuration file
regarding this problem.
zen others,
building a
On 18/04/07, Volker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but with that configuration, still the proxy ip address that visible
when my client using the proxy.
Don't understand that sentence. What address is visible to whom? And
which address do you want to 'hide'? If you don't want to leak your
internal
On 04/18/07 14:14, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 18/04/07, Volker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but with that configuration, still the proxy ip address that visible
when my client using the proxy.
Don't understand that sentence. What address is visible to whom? And
which address do you want to
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 02:25:32PM +0200, Volker wrote:
On 04/18/07 14:14, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 18/04/07, Volker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but with that configuration, still the proxy ip address that visible
when my client using the proxy.
Don't understand that sentence. What
Volker wrote:
On 04/18/07 14:14, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 18/04/07, Volker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but with that configuration, still the proxy ip address that visible
when my client using the proxy.
Don't understand that sentence. What address is visible to whom? And
which
Adrian Chadd wrote:
A little birdie has told me that this mode of transparent
client-spoofing is possible with FreeBSD with a little kernel hackery
(much less than whats needed for TPROXY.)
Maybe someone who knows the code better than I could comment on how
difficult it'd be to add in
On 19/04/07, zen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if there is any such thing , i'm willing to be a tester .
i will deploy it on my server and enviroment ( live one)
I'm talking to someone about it who has some patches against -current.
We'll see what can be done.
Thankfully! The solution for FreeBSD
Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 19/04/07, zen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if there is any such thing , i'm willing to be a tester .
i will deploy it on my server and enviroment ( live one)
I'm talking to someone about it who has some patches against -current.
We'll see what can be done.
i'm glad to
hi,
i know it seem out of topic,
i recently build a proxy server to serve our small ISP,
but i'm facing a big problem. as far as i know FreeBSD didn't support
TPROXY like linux had.
but i need to build this proxy transparently so only my client ips that
visible when browsing.
i use ipnat
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 09:17, zen wrote:
i know it seem out of topic,
i recently build a proxy server to serve our small ISP,
but i'm facing a big problem. as far as i know FreeBSD didn't support
TPROXY like linux had.
but i need to build this proxy transparently so only my client ips
On 2007-Apr-17 14:17:05 +0700, zen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does anyone has experience building a true transparent proxy with FreeBSD?
please share the knowledge and the regarding this problems.
Max beat me to answering but I use squid+IPfilter as a transparent proxy
on my home firewall. The
В сообщении от Tuesday 17 April 2007 11:17:05 zen написал(а):
hi,
i know it seem out of topic,
i recently build a proxy server to serve our small ISP,
but i'm facing a big problem. as far as i know FreeBSD didn't support
TPROXY like linux had.
but i need to build this proxy transparently so
alexander,
list, sorry for posting to list, i tried to post to advertised mail
address and my post bounced as user unknown. so i try here.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 09:29:21PM +0400, Alexander Kuprijanov wrote:
÷ ÓÏÏÂÝÅÎÉÉ ÏÔ Tuesday 17 April 2007 11:17:05 zen ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ(Á):
I use transparent
jonathan michaels wrote:
alexander,
list, sorry for posting to list, i tried to post to advertised mail
address and my post bounced as user unknown. so i try here.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 09:29:21PM +0400, Alexander Kuprijanov wrote:
÷ ÓÏÏÂÝÅÎÉÉ ÏÔ Tuesday 17 April 2007 11:17:05 zen
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 08:35:16AM +0700, zen wrote:
jonathan michaels wrote:
alexander,
list, sorry for posting to list, i tried to post to advertised mail
address and my post bounced as user unknown. so i try here.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 09:29:21PM +0400, Alexander Kuprijanov wrote:
jonathan michaels wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 08:35:16AM +0700, zen wrote:
jonathan michaels wrote:
alexander,
list, sorry for posting to list, i tried to post to advertised mail
address and my post bounced as user unknown. so i try here.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 09:29:21PM
On 18/04/07, zen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think so, it work on most of linux machine depend on your linux kernel.
here is the patch for the kernel :
http://www.balabit.com/downloads/tproxy/
but if i cand choose linux or FreeBSD i preferred FreeBSD ( i'm a
FreeBSD die hard user).
that's why i
20 matches
Mail list logo
