Hi,
long story short, I have a partition on a RAID5 array which after an accident
where I had to rebuild the array became smaller than it originally was. Here's
the original size:
amrd1: 1430505MB (2929674240 sectors) RAID 5 (degraded)
and the new size after the rebuild:
amrd1: 1430400MB
On 6/29/06, Francisco Reyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sergey Shyman writes:
Can't work out which disk we are booting from.
Guessed BIOS device 0x not found by probes, defaulting to disk0.
Is that a RAID you are booting from?
No, ordinary IDE drive
Booting with old kernel works
On 6/30/06, Tony Maher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sergey Shyman wrote:
I have FreeBSD 5.4 box with Intel865 chipset. The 5.4 works fine nearly
a year. But strange troubles happens when I've tried to upgrade to 6.1
(via make buildworld make kernel).
The loader show me following messages and
Michel Talon wrote:
I guess I'm still just a bit stunned that a bug this obvious not only
found it's way into the STABLE branch, but is still there. Maybe it's
not as obvious as I think, or not many folks are using it? All I know
for sure here is that if I had upgraded to 6.1 my network
the one thing that sticks out to me about this report is that they
upgraded teh NFS server to FC5 ... what was the server running before? if
FreeBSD, could the problem be an interaction problem between the NFS
server and client, vs just the client side?
Previously the server used Fedora
I only started to see the lockd problems when upgrading the server side
to FreeBSD 6.x and later. I had various FreeBSD clients, between 4.x
and 7-current and the lockd problem only showed up when upgrading the
server from 5.x to 6.x.
As far as i remember FreeBSD-4 did not have a true lockd,
Based on prior reading about this problem, I'd venture to guess that the
file locking between FC5 and FreeBSD simply isn't. See, between just 2
machines sharing files without rpc.lockd running you won't see a
problem. Both the client and the server must not only be running
rpc.lockd,
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:48:06PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 01:49:04PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:35:21PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[logo_banamex_com.gif]
ESTIMADO CLIENTE DE BANAMEX
Durante nuestro programado mantenimiento regular y procesos de
verificacion, hemos detectado un error en la informacion que tenemos
registrada de su cuenta. Esto se debe a algunos de estos factores:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006, Robert Watson wrote:
6.1-STABLE crashed on me. I'm providing a backtrace. Could any of you,
experienced people, suggest me if it's a hardware problem or is it an
error inside the OS?
This is a known bug in the TCP code; a large set of outstanding changes
is present in
On 6/29/06, Michael Collette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This last week I had been working on a test network to test out 6.1
prior to upgrading our production boxes from 5.4. That's when I ran
across the rpc.lockd issues that have been discussed earlier.
Our production setup has diskless clients
On 6/30/06, Morten A. Middelthon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
long story short, I have a partition on a RAID5 array which after an accident
where I had to rebuild the array became smaller than it originally was. Here's
the original size:
amrd1: 1430505MB (2929674240 sectors) RAID 5 (degraded)
On 26 Jun 2006, at 11:55, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
For the server that I'm fighting with right now, where Dmitry
pointed out that it looks like a deadlock issue ... I have dumpdev/
savecore enabled, is there some way of forcing it to panic when I
know I actually have the deadlock, so
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Stanislaw Halik wrote:
Per my earlier e-mail, I had hoped to merge a larger set of changes from
HEAD that resolve the underlying problem here (that inpcb's can be detached
from a socket while the socket is still in use), but right now I'm
deferring merging those changes
Anish Mistry wrote:
Have you tried to boot without ulpt loaded? ie. remove
ulpt_load=YES from your /boot/loader.conf
Yes, but then the system creates only the umass devices for the
cardreader and still no ugen for the rest of the printer.
Sincerly,
Christian Schade
signature.asc
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006, Robert Watson wrote:
Unfortunately, it still happens to crash in the same code path:
snip
I'll be happy to test any other patches when they're available.
Thanks for testing the patch -- it looks like there's a more pressing
logical problem in this code! Could you try
I tried to let my user to mount floppy however it doesnt work...see below:
%ls -al /dev/fd0
crw-rw-rw- 1 root operator0, 98 Jun 30 18:22 /dev/fd0
%ls -al /mnt
total 4
drwxrwxrwx 2 root wheel 512 May 1 2005 .
drwxr-xr-x 20 root wheel 512 Jun 30 18:21 ..
%mount /dev/fd0 /mnt
mount:
On Fri, June 30, 2006 9:17 am, Evren Yurtesen wrote:
I tried to let my user to mount floppy however it doesnt work...see
below:
%ls -al /dev/fd0
crw-rw-rw- 1 root operator0, 98 Jun 30 18:22 /dev/fd0 %ls -al
/mnt
total 4 drwxrwxrwx 2 root wheel 512 May 1 2005 . drwxr-xr-x 20
Freddie Cash wrote:
On Fri, June 30, 2006 9:17 am, Evren Yurtesen wrote:
I tried to let my user to mount floppy however it doesnt work...see
below:
%ls -al /dev/fd0
crw-rw-rw- 1 root operator0, 98 Jun 30 18:22 /dev/fd0 %ls -al
/mnt
total 4 drwxrwxrwx 2 root wheel 512 May 1 2005 .
On Fri, June 30, 2006 9:35 am, Evren Yurtesen wrote:
Freddie Cash wrote:
On Fri, June 30, 2006 9:17 am, Evren Yurtesen wrote:
I tried to let my user to mount floppy however it doesnt
work...see below:
%ls -al /dev/fd0
crw-rw-rw- 1 root operator0, 98 Jun 30 18:22 /dev/fd0 %ls
-al
On Friday 30 June 2006 18:17, Evren Yurtesen wrote:
I tried to let my user to mount floppy however it doesnt work...see
below:
%ls -al /dev/fd0
crw-rw-rw- 1 root operator0, 98 Jun 30 18:22 /dev/fd0
%ls -al /mnt
total 4
drwxrwxrwx 2 root wheel 512 May 1 2005 .
drwxr-xr-x 20
Joseph Koshy wrote:
I have vfs.usermount=1 and 666 mode on /dev/fd0
What am I missing? :) Can you tell the exact point?
Having the user in the 'operator' group and keeping
the matching ownership for the device name in /dev.
The URL below says:
Evren Yurtesen wrote:
I tried to let my user to mount floppy however it doesnt work...see
below:
%ls -al /dev/fd0
crw-rw-rw- 1 root operator0, 98 Jun 30 18:22 /dev/fd0
%ls -al /mnt
total 4
drwxrwxrwx 2 root wheel 512 May 1 2005 .
drwxr-xr-x 20 root wheel 512 Jun 30 18:21 ..
Michael Vince said the following on 6/29/06 8:53 PM:
The thing that have to ask is if Atanas has 100's why can't he just boot
Freebsd have have them all prebound to the interface at startup, why
would you need to add and remove them constantly by the hundreds during
normal server uptime?
I
Kostik Belousov wrote:
First, I set the followup to the right mailing list.
Second, I am really curious what you do. My understanding follows: you
have set up vnode-backed md device (md0a) on sparce file, created ufs2
on it, mounted it with quotas, and run background fsck on that fs. At
the
If you're running FreeBSD on an eMachines T3304 system, could you please
send me a copy of your /var/run/dmesg.boot? Thanks!
--lyndon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe,
User Freebsd said the following on 6/29/06 9:29 PM:
The other funny thing about the current em driver is that if you move an
IP to it from a different server, the appropriate ARP packets aren't
sent out to redirect the IP traffic .. recently, someone pointed me to
arping, which has solved my
Hi,
How do i set up the adater in FreeBSD. I do have the internet connection but
the light does not come up. Do I have to do some installation. please tell
me.
(I do understand that this is trival for most but for me it is very
important starting step)
Thanks
--
What we see depends mainly on
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Atanas wrote:
A workaround is to power both of the systems down and then power them up.
This however cannot be done remotely and in case there were IP aliases, they
still don't get any traffic.
see 'arping' ... great little tool, solved all my problems as far as
moving
Francisco Reyes writes:
| Atanas writes:
| I have some newer machines with 2 Broadcom chips on-board. I plan to
| give them a try at some point in the future, but I'm not sure how stable
| the bge driver
|
| For us they have been a problem. Primarily because it causes all kinds of
|
Greetings -stable list
Running 6.1-STABLE on a Supermicro P8SCT motherboard with a
3Ware 9550SX sata raid card.
The machine hangs during the boot countdown about 50% of the time.
This situation may be similar to kern/90086 and i386/93762
The P8SCT is supplied on recent Supermicro servers with
Doug Ambrisko writes:
Can you try:
http://www.ambrisko.com/doug/bge_ipmi_3.patch
and see if that helps. I need one minor tweak to it before I can
commit it.
We have a brand new machine getting readied.. Passed along the patch URL to
the tech building the machine.
On Jun 30, 2006, at 4:28 PM, Mihir Sanghavi wrote:
How do i set up the adater in FreeBSD. I do have the internet
connection but
the light does not come up. Do I have to do some installation.
please tell
me.
There isn't enough detail to address what's going wrong. :-)
I think you're
I've just acquired a couple of old Compaq Armada laptops. I can
successfully install 6.1-RELEASE but the system won't boot from
the HDD: The MBR menu displays but pressing F1 (the FreeBSD
partition) just beeps. Pressing F3 (the Compaq configuration
partition) works.
I've checked that the CHS
User Freebsd said the following on 6/30/06 1:48 PM:
see 'arping' ... great little tool, solved all my problems as far as
moving around IPs ...
Thanks for the tip, I will try it next time.
I still have many 4.x based machines, and both em issues (the card
reset on each alias and the arp
Hi everyone.
I'm currently running the following:
Hardware: Dell PowerEdge 2850 rack mounted server, Dual 3.4 Ghz Xeon,
5 Gb memory
Hard Drives: LSILogic PERC 4e/Di, configured as RAID 5, with 3 X 40
Gb disks
OS: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p6 for amd64
It's sole purpose is to be an SQL server,
Hello,
I have finished installing FreeBSD 6.1 on an IBM PC 300PL/PII-400MHz/320MB RAM
a week ago and I realised it used the hdd alot, so I have updated the BIOS to
the latest
version updated the kernel with the latest stable version, same thing with the
world.
Finally I took a look in dmesg
Hi Dan,
It's usually best to go with the current production release. As
such, I would recommend going with the latest release of FreeBSD 6.
FreeBSD 5 is now a legacy release, so support for it will probably
start to fall off sooner rather than later. Also, as I understand it,
version 5 was
Is there some easy way to force a full (non-preen) and at the same time
parallel (i.e. one process per disk) fsck?
It could be a real down time saver in crash recovery situations. Imagine
the following (fairly typical in my case) scenario:
You have many machines with some bunch of drives
I found a little bug (probably) in sys/dev/ata-all.c which somehow corrupts
device parameters structure. When I first did atacontrol list device info
about ad0 looked like this:
Master: ad0 Maxtor 6Y080P0/YAR41BW0 ATA/ATAPI revision 7
after I ran atacontrol cap ad0 it printed somewhat messy
I found a little bug (probably) in sys/dev/ata-all.c which somehow corrupts
device parameters structure. When I first did atacontrol list device info
about ad0 looked like this:
Master: ad0 Maxtor 6Y080P0/YAR41BW0 ATA/ATAPI revision 7
after I ran atacontrol cap ad0 it printed somewhat messy
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 12:28:49PM -0700, Atanas wrote:
User Freebsd said the following on 6/29/06 9:29 PM:
The other funny thing about the current em driver is that if you move an
IP to it from a different server, the appropriate ARP packets aren't
sent out to redirect the IP traffic
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 05:48:23PM -0300, User Freebsd wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Atanas wrote:
A workaround is to power both of the systems down and then power them up.
This however cannot be done remotely and in case there were IP aliases,
they still don't get any traffic.
see
43 matches
Mail list logo
