One of goals for the toolchain prior to the FreeBSD 11 branch is to
create a libllvm.so and libclang.so for use by all of the LLVM family
tools installed in the base system. This message is just a heads-up in
case anyone has questions or comments on the idea.
We currently build a large number of
On 16 Dec 2014, at 16:58, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 16 Dec 2014, at 15:46, Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org wrote:
One of goals for the toolchain prior to the FreeBSD 11 branch is to
create a libllvm.so and libclang.so for use by all of the LLVM family
tools installed in the
On 16 Dec 2014, at 16:04, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
This is precisely why the libs should go into /usr/lib/private, so as to
avoid collisions with any upstream libraries installed by e.g. ports (or
when you manually run make install after building).
That's still potentially an
On 16 Dec 2014, at 17:15, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 16 Dec 2014, at 16:04, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
This is precisely why the libs should go into /usr/lib/private, so as to
avoid collisions with any upstream libraries installed by e.g. ports (or
when you
On Dec 16, 2014, at 9:32 AM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 16 Dec 2014, at 17:15, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 16 Dec 2014, at 16:04, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
This is precisely why the libs should go into /usr/lib/private, so as to
avoid
On Dec 16, 2014, at 10:44 AM, Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org wrote:
Fair enough, I'd definitely like to see fewer build-time knobs over
time, not more.
Until we stop using build-time knobs to control what’s in the final image
as a poor man’s packaging scheme, I expect the number of knobs to
imp added a subscriber: imp.
imp accepted this revision.
imp added a reviewer: imp.
imp added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Looks good to me.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1327
To: emaste, imp
Cc: imp, freebsd-toolchain
