On Mar 29, 2015, at 6:37 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneurab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 29, 2015, at 15:56, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
On Mar 29, 2015, at 2:29 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
If we
On Mar 29, 2015, at 15:56, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
On Mar 29, 2015, at 2:29 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
If we built a UFS1-only boot2, that would fit in the 7.5k we have left
to play
I used this script to build with gcc 4.9:
https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ci/blob/master/scripts/build/cross-build.sh
Buildling sys/i386/boot2 failed:
...
output: fmt=bin size=21ef text=200 data=1fef org=0 entry=0
-1007 bytes available
*** Error code 1
Oof, this is going
On Mar 29, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Roman Divacky rdiva...@freebsd.org wrote:
I used this script to build with gcc 4.9:
https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ci/blob/master/scripts/build/cross-build.sh
Buildling sys/i386/boot2 failed:
...
output: fmt=bin size=21ef text=200 data=1fef org=0
You [Craig Rodrigues] seem to be checking some ??-xtoolchain-gcc things
officially. I've some user-experience notes from happening to use
powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc in my exploration of FreeBSD. Hopefully some of it
might be of interest. It groups together information from various notices as I
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
If we built a UFS1-only boot2, that would fit in the 7.5k we have left
to play with. We could then build a UFS2-only boot2 that would easily
fit in the like 32k limit that UFS2 has.
The only reason we went to supporting
On 29 Mar 2015, at 22:39, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
When building with gcc 4.9, I am getting unresolved symbols at link
time when building usr.bin/clang/clang. Here is one error message:
Hi,
When building with gcc 4.9, I am getting unresolved symbols at link
time when building usr.bin/clang/clang. Here is one error message:
/usr/obj/opt2/branches/head/usr.bin/clang/clang/../../../lib/clang/libclangcodegen/libclang
codegen.a(ModuleBuilder.o): In function `(anonymous
On Mar 29, 2015, at 13:29, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Just out of curiousity, what is it about newer compilers that cause
the size of boot2 to increase so much?
Code generation is different, especially with regards to optimisations. Longer
code might be faster because the
On Mar 29, 2015, at 2:29 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
If we built a UFS1-only boot2, that would fit in the 7.5k we have left
to play with. We could then build a UFS2-only boot2 that would easily
fit in
10 matches
Mail list logo