Re: [toolchain] amd64-gcc question

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 04:04:07PM -0553, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 11/15/15 13:58, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Nov 2015, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > >> I pkg-installed amd64-gcc over the weekend hoping for Graphite > >> (auto-loop parallelization) support, but no go. > >

[Differential] [Accepted] D3190: ar: enable deterministic mode by default

bapt accepted this revision. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3190 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: emaste, brooks, bapt Cc: freebsd-toolchain-list ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org

[Differential] [Accepted] D3175: ar: add -U (unique) option to disable -D (deterministic) mode

bapt accepted this revision. bapt added a comment. This is one of the changes I really needed! REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3175 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: emaste, imp, brooks, bapt Cc: freebsd-toolchain-list

[Differential] [Commented On] D2887: Allow ELF Tool Chain elfcopy to be installed as objcopy

bapt added a subscriber: bapt. bapt added a comment. Why not always build elfcopy and just make a hardlink objcopy if MK_ELFCOPY_AS_OBJCOPY is set? That will make elfcopy always available to users REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2887 EMAIL PREFERENCES

[Differential] [Accepted] D2887: Allow ELF Tool Chain elfcopy to be installed as objcopy

bapt accepted this revision. bapt added a reviewer: bapt. This revision has a positive review. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2887 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: emaste, andrew, bapt Cc: bapt, bdrewery,

[Differential] [Accepted] D2187: Ensure cross assembler, linker and objcopy are used for the build32 stage

bapt accepted this revision. bapt added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. yup you are right This looks ok for me I still would be more confident with @imp reviewing as well :) BRANCH /head REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2187 To: dim, imp, rodrigc,

[Differential] [Accepted] D2156: Switch to ELF toolchain readelf

bapt accepted this revision. bapt added a reviewer: bapt. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2156 To: emaste, imp, bapt Cc: freebsd-toolchain ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list

[Differential] [Accepted] D1974: Support out-of-tree binutils with in-tree compiler

bapt accepted this revision. bapt added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. Looks ok to me REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1974 To: emaste, bapt Cc: andrew, freebsd-toolchain ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org

Re: Resurrecting clang external toolchain support in Makefile.inc

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:55:17PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: On Feb 11, 2015, at 7:14 PM, Peter Grehan gre...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi Warner, I like this patch better than the one I have. I’m not 100% sure the ‘else’ clause will work The else for CROSS_BINUTILS_PREFIX ? If so,

Re: Resurrecting clang external toolchain support in Makefile.inc

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 07:50:59PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: On Feb 10, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Peter Grehan gre...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi toolchain folk, I've recently tried using the base system clang as an external toolchain i.e. make CROSS_COMPILER_PREFIX=/usr/bin/ buildworld

[Differential] [Updated] D1516: Update aarch64 patch for binutils 2.25

bapt added a comment. Just for the record I approved via IRC REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1516 To: emaste, andrew, bapt Cc: freebsd-toolchain ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list

Using more elftoolchain tools?

Hi all, From what I can see on the elftoolchain website, they do have working replacement for: - size(1) - addr2line(1) - strings(1) - nm(1) - strip(1) Does anyone knows if there are known issues with those? or if they are viable replacement for the version we have in base? I'm planning to