Re: Migrating arm(v7) to LLD_BOOTSTRAP

2018-07-31 Thread Ed Maste
On 16 January 2018 at 18:45, Ed Maste wrote: > With the update to Clang/LLVM/lld 6.0.0 I believe lld is nearly ready > to be used as the system linker for armv7, and I plan to enable > LLD_BOOTSTRAP by default after a couple of WIP patches land and after > a little more testing. This may happen a

Re: Migrating arm(v7) to LLD_BOOTSTRAP

2018-03-15 Thread Ed Maste
On 17 January 2018 at 00:35, Michal Meloun wrote: > >>> ld: error: lld may use movt/movw, no object with architecture >>> supporting feature detected. > > But this means that we can not use lld for kernel module linking. > (assuming that lld can emits movt/movw with

Re: Migrating arm(v7) to LLD_BOOTSTRAP

2018-01-16 Thread Michal Meloun
On 17.01.2018 2:41, Warner Losh wrote: On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Ed Maste wrote: With the update to Clang/LLVM/lld 6.0.0 I believe lld is nearly ready to be used as the system linker for armv7, and I plan to enable LLD_BOOTSTRAP by default after a couple of WIP

Re: Migrating arm(v7) to LLD_BOOTSTRAP

2018-01-16 Thread Warner Losh
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Ed Maste wrote: > With the update to Clang/LLVM/lld 6.0.0 I believe lld is nearly ready > to be used as the system linker for armv7, and I plan to enable > LLD_BOOTSTRAP by default after a couple of WIP patches land and after > a little more

Migrating arm(v7) to LLD_BOOTSTRAP

2018-01-16 Thread Ed Maste
With the update to Clang/LLVM/lld 6.0.0 I believe lld is nearly ready to be used as the system linker for armv7, and I plan to enable LLD_BOOTSTRAP by default after a couple of WIP patches land and after a little more testing. This may happen a week or two from now. This should have little impact