Re: powerpc64 example, base/binutils presence vs. devel/powerpc64-gcc build failure: "phase: build-depends" confused then gcc config aborts build

2018-10-15 Thread John Baldwin
On 10/15/18 11:55 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:25 PM John Baldwin > wrote: > > On 10/15/18 11:06 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018, 10:20 AM John Baldwin

Re: powerpc64 example, base/binutils presence vs. devel/powerpc64-gcc build failure: "phase: build-depends" confused then gcc config aborts build

2018-10-15 Thread Warner Losh
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:25 PM John Baldwin wrote: > On 10/15/18 11:06 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018, 10:20 AM John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org>> wrote: > > > > On 10/12/18 6:51 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > > > The following is from attempting to build

Re: powerpc64 example, base/binutils presence vs. devel/powerpc64-gcc build failure: "phase: build-depends" confused then gcc config aborts build

2018-10-15 Thread John Baldwin
On 10/15/18 11:06 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018, 10:20 AM John Baldwin > wrote: > > On 10/12/18 6:51 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > > The following is from attempting to build devel/powerpc-gcc > > via poudriere-devel on the powerpc64 system

Re: powerpc64 example, base/binutils presence vs. devel/powerpc64-gcc build failure: "phase: build-depends" confused then gcc config aborts build

2018-10-15 Thread Warner Losh
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018, 10:20 AM John Baldwin wrote: > On 10/12/18 6:51 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > > The following is from attempting to build devel/powerpc-gcc > > via poudriere-devel on the powerpc64 system after having > > bootstrapped via (in part) base/binutils and the .txz > > produced on the

Re: powerpc64 example, base/binutils presence vs. devel/powerpc64-gcc build failure: "phase: build-depends" confused then gcc config aborts build

2018-10-15 Thread John Baldwin
On 10/12/18 6:51 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > The following is from attempting to build devel/powerpc-gcc > via poudriere-devel on the powerpc64 system after having > bootstrapped via (in part) base/binutils and the .txz > produced on the host (amd64). > > Looks like having both: > >

powerpc64 example, base/binutils presence vs. devel/powerpc64-gcc build failure: "phase: build-depends" confused then gcc config aborts build

2018-10-12 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-toolchain
The following is from attempting to build devel/powerpc-gcc via poudriere-devel on the powerpc64 system after having bootstrapped via (in part) base/binutils and the .txz produced on the host (amd64). Looks like having both: /usr/bin/powerpc64-unknown-freebsd12.0-* and: