Re: clang sanitizers (memory, address, etc)

2013-10-24 Thread squid
On 2013-10-23 15:10, David Chisnall wrote: I had a chat with some of the *san people (mostly from Google Moscow) quite recently. They've refactored most of the code so it should be fairly obvious where the platform-specific bigs are. In most cases, it's just some interposition on

Re: clang sanitizers (memory, address, etc)

2013-10-24 Thread David Chisnall
On 24 Oct 2013, at 08:41, sq...@peralex.com wrote: On 2013-10-23 15:10, David Chisnall wrote: I had a chat with some of the *san people (mostly from Google Moscow) quite recently. They've refactored most of the code so it should be fairly obvious where the platform-specific bigs are. In

Re: clang sanitizers (memory, address, etc)

2013-10-23 Thread squid
On 2013-10-22 18:30, Dimitry Andric wrote: The sanitizers have not yet been ported, and while I have heard that some work was done, there is no coordinated effort yet. This is one of the many items on my todo-lists, but other things came first... Thanks. I look forward to that. I'll

clang sanitizers (memory, address, etc)

2013-10-22 Thread squid
Good day, I'm running current, and I've managed to compile, but not link some code using -sanitizer=memory. The linker is missing some symbols (__msan_memcpy and others), and I can't find the appropriate library. I've found no mention of anybody using the sanitizers on FreeBSD though. Are those

Re: clang sanitizers (memory, address, etc)

2013-10-22 Thread Dimitry Andric
On Oct 22, 2013, at 15:05, sq...@peralex.com wrote: I'm running current, and I've managed to compile, but not link some code using -sanitizer=memory. The linker is missing some symbols (__msan_memcpy and others), and I can't find the appropriate library. I've found no mention of anybody using