I don't think we should start trimming features just because we think
heavy usage might be too much for the hardware. If we make a per-user
solution now, it doesn't really add overhead for single user cases
that we can use now on dreamplug servers, and it would be really
useful to have good
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Michiel de Jong mich...@unhosted.org wrote:
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Michael Rauch l...@miranet.ch wrote:
- with PageKite, this probably leads to registering a domain name for a box.
as this is how the regular web works, normal browser/http-client can
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 16:28:46 +0200, Markus Sabadello wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Nick M. Daly wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 16:25:16 +0200, Markus Sabadello wrote:
We should also have some updating mechanism...
1. When the FreedomBox boots, it checks if a certain file
So in freedom-maker I can see the following files in kernel/
2733212 2012-02-22 21:38 uImage
2455668 2012-07-07 18:34 uInitrd
But on the freedombox image I have this in boot/
2733212 uImage
2733148 vmlinuz-3.0.0
1180839 System.map-3.0.0
1075602
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 22:39:05 +0200, Markus Sabadello wrote:
Which kernel file and which initrd file does the Dreamplug actually boot
with a freedom-maker generated image?
Or I guess more specifically I am asking why the uInitrd from freedom-maker
is not in the image.
Sorry Markus, that's an
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Nick Hardiman
n...@internetmachines.co.ukwrote:
If, like me, you want to follow Nick's instructions for building a fresh
image, here's the 18 step procedure I followed.
I have a little sysadmin skill but I've never used multistrap or other
esoteric build
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/07/12 20:43, Bjarni Rúnar Einarsson wrote:
== Scenario Three: Prepackaged Domain/SSL/PageKite ==
A variation on the above two, where instead of the user registering
their own domain and SSL certificate, both are provided
preconfigured on
Hmm I'm getting this error with freedom maker..
Running install script from source/install.sh
chroot: cannot run command `/install.sh': No such file or directory
make: *** [stamp-dreamplug-rootfs] Error 127
Markus
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Markus Sabadello
markus.sabade...@gmail.com
On 07/08/2012 09:43 PM, Bjarni Rúnar Einarsson wrote:
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Michiel de Jongmich...@unhosted.org wrote:
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Michael Rauchl...@miranet.ch wrote:
- with PageKite, this probably leads to registering a domain name for a box.
as this is how the
On 07/08/2012 09:45 PM, Nick M. Daly wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 16:25:54 +0300, Michiel de Jong wrote:
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Michael Rauch wrote:
with PageKite, this probably leads to registering a domain name for
a box...
or subdomain, which saves money.
with Tor HS, no need to
Hmm now I'm getting this at the very beginning..
Multistrapping...
em_multistrap 0.0.8 using fbx-armel.conf
Using foreign architecture: armel
em_multistrap: No sources defined for a foreign multistrap
Using your existing apt sources. To use different sources,
and list them with
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Michael Rogers mich...@briarproject.org wrote:
Cons: Requires the user have a public IP. The FreedomBox
distributor becomes a single point of attack as they have a
central list of which domain belongs to which user. The
distributor is also in a position which
I think the problem is that I have a really old version of multistrap
(em_multistrap 0.0.8).
I installed it with apt-get, but I'm on an older version of Ubuntu rather
than a recent Debian.
I'll figure this out myself, I'm sure freedom-maker is fine, sorry for
spamming the list.
Markus
On Mon,
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 00:54:24 +0200, Markus Sabadello wrote:
I think the problem is that I have a really old version of multistrap
(em_multistrap 0.0.8).
I installed it with apt-get, but I'm on an older version of Ubuntu rather
than a recent Debian.
The Squeeze multistrap works fine, if you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/07/12 23:41, Bjarni Rúnar Einarsson wrote:
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Bjarni Rúnar Einarsson Oops,
please don't take my last reply too seriously. But you're
confusing scenarios there, what you just described is scenario Two
or Four.
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Michael Rogers
mich...@briarproject.org wrote:
On 08/07/12 23:41, Bjarni Rúnar Einarsson wrote:
Not quite - unlike scenario two, the user would get a subdomain from
the PageKite provider, rather than using her own domain. And unlike
scenario four, the user
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:28:03 +0200, Mathieu Jourdan wrote:
https://github.com/NickDaly/plinth
By fork, do you suggest to create one more account then a third Plinth
repository on github? Isn't it preferable to push to existing
repositories, avoiding confusion to new contributors? By
17 matches
Mail list logo
