Tom's method of correcting your behavior was, shall we say, blunt, but the
underlying criticism is still valid for any mailing list.
- Subject lines should reflect the subject. Start a new thread if
necessary.
- If you are asking for help you should include whatever diagnostic
information you
On 23/06/2015 15:41, JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU wrote:
I have a memory problem.I booted FreeDOS into my flashdrive,which is 8
gigabytes.But when I ran MEM,it reported that I have under 1 megabyte of
free memory.If I run Visual Basic 1.0,it reports that I am out of
memory.Any help for this?I have
even a clueless moron like you could
Tom.I DO NOT like your disrespect.Call me a moron again,and we are going to
have a problem.These threads are to help make FreeDOS a better operating
system.I could not figure out why I am getting an out of memory error
message,so i posted it as a possible
I have a memory problem.I booted FreeDOS into my flashdrive,which
is 8 gigabytes.But when I ran MEM,it reported that I have under 1
megabyte of free memory.If I run Visual Basic 1.0,it reports that I
am out of memory.Any help for this?I have absolutely no clue,to be
honest.I can't even
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Mercury Thirteen
mercury0x0...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm still reviewing the packages to ensure they're all open source
compliant.
What are we considering acceptable in this regard? Are we going only with
software which has been made available under one of
I'm still reviewing the packages to ensure they're all open source
compliant.
What are we considering acceptable in this regard? Are we going only with
software which has been made available under one of the GNU licenses
exclusively? Obviously programs which are free but have no source available
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Mercury Thirteen wrote:
I'm still reviewing the packages to ensure they're all open source
compliant.
What are we considering acceptable in this regard? Are we going only with
software which has been made available under one of the GNU licenses
exclusively? Obviously
I would tend to agree; GPL / public domain /
source-code-free-and-available-at-no-cost options are all viable in my
mind, but I want to 1) make sure I perform this task to the standards of
the project's leader and the community to which I have volunteered and 2)
avoid a potential user out there
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Mercury Thirteen wrote:
I guess I didn't scroll up enough to read your reply! Sorry about that, and
thanks for the input. :)
So, you're saying we should only use 100% GPL software, yes?
I can easily go through and pull the affected packages; I really don't
think there
Yes, they should be. I think they are all mostly the same as the GPL, but
I'm not certain. For the time being, I'll just remove the closed source
packages and leave all the public domain and source-freely-available
programs. If there's an issue, I can always pull more stuff out later on.
On Tue,
I guess I didn't scroll up enough to read your reply! Sorry about that, and
thanks for the input. :)
So, you're saying we should only use 100% GPL software, yes?
I can easily go through and pull the affected packages; I really don't
think there are that many remaining, so going with GPL-only
from Mercury Thirteen:
Yes, they should be. I think they are all mostly the same as the GPL, but
I'm not certain. For the time being, I'll just remove the closed source
packages and leave all the public domain and source-freely-available
programs. If there's an issue, I can always pull more
On 6/23/2015 7:28 AM, Michael Brutman wrote:
Tom's method of correcting your behavior was, shall we say, blunt, but
the underlying criticism is still valid for any mailing list.
- Subject lines should reflect the subject. Start a new thread if
necessary.
- If you are asking for help you
13 matches
Mail list logo
