Re: [Freedos-devel] mTCP/IP stack by M Brutman is now closed source

Hi guys, I've been coding free (as in use for no costs) software since 1994, with 60 thousand lines of code. ;-) It's open source but not exactly free (as in you may modify, republish it etc.) software. Since about 2010, not only I have no time to develop it but it also became obsolete, and

Re: [Freedos-devel] mTCP/IP stack by M Brutman is now closed source

Hi all, Why are we doing so difficult about something that somebody not want to do. It is his thing and we have two options: - using the old one. - search for another one. I don't want to be annoying but it is the case. Maarten Op 9 sep. 2015 06:57 schreef "Steve Nickolas"

Re: [Freedos-devel] mTCP/IP stack by M Brutman is now closed source

from Maarten Vermeulen: > Why are we doing so difficult about something that somebody not want to > do. It is his thing and we have two options: > - using the old one. > - search for another one. > I don't want to be annoying but it is the case. > Maarten > Op 9 sep. 2015 06:57 schreef "Steve

Re: [Freedos-devel] mTCP/IP stack by M Brutman is now closed source

Hi Joe! Em Wed, 9 Sep 2015 10:10:17 +0200 (CEST) Joe Forster/STA escreveu: > But now I'm creating my own - GNU-style, generalized - utilities for > processing database exports for my job. They haven't been released > yet but I already wrote into all of them: "released into

Re: [Freedos-devel] mTCP/IP stack by M Brutman is now closed source

Ralf,I would ask that you take a breather.It is his program,he may do whatever he wishes with it. On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Ralf Quint wrote: > On 9/8/2015 7:46 PM, Michael Brutman wrote: > > > > I don't know how to respond to this; > Well, just don't. > This guy is

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 Installer Project.

Could you stuff the keys? It should work provided your command line to be piped to the next program is short enough (15 chars) to fit into the keyboard buffer. On 9/9/2015 6:33 PM, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote: > A minor snag in development is driving me nuts. > > First remember: > >

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 Installer Project.

Hi Jerome, if you want to store temp results in your batch, you could work with errorlevels, the FreeCOM magic errorlevel variable or indeed a ramdrive. In the past, we often used "memdisk", which is a BOOTABLE RAMDRIVE. That way, the installer used a virtual floppy to boot. As you cannot

Re: [Freedos-devel] mTCP/IP stack by M Brutman is now closed source

On 9/9/2015 4:00 PM, JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU wrote: > Ralf,I would ask that you take a breather.It is his program,he may do > whatever he wishes with it. > Well, maybe you should actually read my reply, as that is exactly what I am saying... Ralf --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 Installer Project.

Hi, On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote: > > Unless I’m using it wrong RDISK doesn’t work with any reliability. > I got it to work once in my FDI building Virtual Machine. > I never got the Floppy boot disk version to work. > >

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 Installer Project.

> On Sep 9, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Rugxulo wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. > wrote: >> >>Unless I’m using it wrong RDISK doesn’t work with any reliability. >>I got it to work once in my FDI building

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 Installer Project.

> On Sep 9, 2015, at 7:08 PM, Mercury Thirteen wrote: > > Could you stuff the keys? It should work provided your command line to > be piped to the next program is short enough (15 chars) to fit into the > keyboard buffer. It’s an interesting thought. I also thought

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 Installer Project.

> On Sep 9, 2015, at 8:03 PM, Eric Auer wrote: > > > Hi Jerome, > > if you want to store temp results in your batch, you could > work with errorlevels, the FreeCOM magic errorlevel variable > or indeed a ramdrive. In the past, we often used "memdisk", > which is a BOOTABLE

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 Installer Project.

I honestly don't think it really matters,as long as it installs the OS in a neat,efficient user friendly-ish way. On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote: > > > On Sep 9, 2015, at 7:08 PM, Mercury Thirteen > wrote: > > > > Could

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 Installer Project

Hi, No solutions here, only some ranting :) - the tricky part might be to make it possible to install FreeDOS on a system where there is already something (ie. multiboot), and make it actually bootable, without breaking the other stuff. Personally I wouldn't object if FreeDOS would just

Re: [Freedos-devel] mTCP/IP stack by M Brutman is now closed source

Wow, This is the most activity I've seen on this list in a while, and it's a temper tantrum of sorts over whether someone has the right to close source or open source something they wrote. Talk about comedy. So how are those bugs looking on the bug list in FreeDOS? Yeah, I probably just got

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 Installer Project.

Hi, I'm curious as to why a batch file and DOS 6 setup automatically initiated the format once the drive was selected. On Wed, Sep 9, 2015, 9:28 PM Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote: > > > On Sep 9, 2015, at 8:03 PM, Eric Auer wrote: > > > > > > Hi Jerome, > >

Re: [Freedos-devel] mTCP/IP stack by M Brutman is now closed source

Woops,typo.I meant to type "can't". On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 12:50 PM, JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU < jcharbonnea...@cpsge.org> wrote: > I read a few heated emails.Let's all calm down and discuss this.So,I > understand that the current version of M/TCP isn't open sourced.That's > fine.We still have one from

Re: [Freedos-devel] mTCP/IP stack by M Brutman is now closed source

I read a few heated emails.Let's all calm down and discuss this.So,I understand that the current version of M/TCP isn't open sourced.That's fine.We still have one from two years ago,which is not THAT outdated.It's not like people are going to try connecting CORTANA to DOS.So there is really no