Re: [Freedos-devel] FDI 1.2

2015-10-01 Thread Jerome E. Shidel Jr.
> On Oct 1, 2015, at 5:46 AM, Eric Auer wrote: > > > Hi Jerome, thanks for your work on your installer :-) Welcome. :^) > >> 1) boots from floppy or floppy image (like boot CD) >> >> (Note: if user manually lauches installer, skip 2 and goto 3) >> >> 2) Detects if

Re: [Freedos-devel] XFTOOLS - exFAT access a la LTOOLS

2015-10-01 Thread Joe Forster/STA
Hi guys, It is probably better to use the source of VMSMOUNT as basis for TSR drivers for exFAT access :-) Thanks, I'll keep that in mind. I already downloaded it. However, my plan is to _first_ release and test the (then read/write) access as a _C_ program and when the algorithm is stable

Re: [Freedos-devel] exfat support from android linux for freedos sdxc support and more?

2015-10-01 Thread Alain Mouette
We could work on the LiDOS (Linux + FreeDOS) toghether, I have all my setups annotated and I can share. Even easier with you as they are in portuguese ;-) First thing would be to define what will be done... We could start with a VirtualBox running Ubuntu 14.04 Server, running FreeDOS at

Re: [Freedos-devel] XFTOOLS - exFAT access a la LTOOLS

2015-10-01 Thread Mercury Thirteen
On 10/1/2015 6:39 AM, Joe Forster/STA wrote: ... I haven't looked into GPT yet but I don't think it should be _that_ complicated. ... It's not. --

Re: [Freedos-devel] exfat support from android linux for freedos sdxc support and more?

2015-10-01 Thread Alain Mouette
The bugs are: 1) something in packet driver that interferes with the mouse. I can use one or the other successfully but not both 2) on 64 bit Linux, the CPU internal timer (a 64 bit register, i don't remeber the name) is not working. (1) is annoying but (2) is a showstopper for me and I can

Re: [Freedos-devel] exfat support from android linux for freedos sdxc support and more?

2015-10-01 Thread JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU
So you wish to mash FreeDOS and linux together? If so,I think we can make that as a DIFFERENT project.It would be interesting to see DOS and Linux made into one OS.It would be quite amusing to be frank. On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Alain Mouette wrote: > We could work on

Re: [Freedos-devel] FDI 1.2

2015-10-01 Thread JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU
I missed a ")" in my sentence.Oh well. :) On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:45 PM, JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU < jcharbonnea...@cpsge.org> wrote: > Visual BASIC 1.0 is a great compiler for GUI apps on DOS.(However,the EXEs > take up quite a bit of memory.) In fact,our FDSHELL was compiled in Visual > BASIC 1.0.

Re: [Freedos-devel] FDI 1.2

2015-10-01 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Jerome, basically the "is the newest DOS already installed" check has to wait for the target selection. Plus it should not be necessary to use black magic* for this: I would prefer if the installer only checks if a DOS with LSM & package manager data structures is installed or not. Then other

Re: [Freedos-devel] XFTOOLS - exFAT access a la LTOOLS

2015-10-01 Thread Bret Johnson
It's not very complicated, but it definitely has some screwy aspects to it. E.g., in an MBR there is a one-byte "Partition Operating System Identifier", which includes different values for things like FAT12, FAT16 small (<32MB), FAT16 large (>32MB), Extended, FAT32, FAT32 w/ VFAT, exFAT, etc.

Re: [Freedos-devel] FDI 1.2

2015-10-01 Thread JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU
Visual BASIC 1.0 is a great compiler for GUI apps on DOS.(However,the EXEs take up quite a bit of memory.) In fact,our FDSHELL was compiled in Visual BASIC 1.0. Perhaps implementing a Visual BASIC installer,keeping the installer as a single EXE? (Advanced options can be shown by typing "Install

Re: [Freedos-devel] FDI 1.2

2015-10-01 Thread Jerome E. Shidel Jr.
> On Oct 1, 2015, at 11:51 AM, Eric Auer wrote: > > > Hi Jerome, > > basically the "is the newest DOS already installed" check > has to wait for the target selection. Plus it should not > be necessary to use black magic* for this: I would prefer > if the installer only

Re: [Freedos-devel] XFTOOLS - exFAT access a la LTOOLS

2015-10-01 Thread Chelson Aitcheson
Nicely put Eric. On 01/10/2015 7:33 pm, "Eric Auer" wrote: > > Hi Rugxulo, > > as mentioned earlier in this thread, generic operating systems > are allowed to implement VFAT (FAT32 and LFN) without fees, so > I would not be too worried about those two more years. Regarding >

Re: [Freedos-devel] XFTOOLS - exFAT access a la LTOOLS

2015-10-01 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Eric Auer wrote: > > as mentioned earlier in this thread, generic operating systems > are allowed to implement VFAT (FAT32 and LFN) without fees, so > I would not be too worried about those two more years. I seriously think you're wrong

Re: [Freedos-devel] XFTOOLS - exFAT access a la LTOOLS

2015-10-01 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Rugxulo, (sorry about the long thread while the FS candidate list shrinks...) >> as mentioned earlier in this thread, generic operating systems >> are allowed to implement VFAT (FAT32 and LFN) without fees, so >> I would not be too worried about those two more years. Referring to two items

Re: [Freedos-devel] FDI 1.2

2015-10-01 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Jerome, thanks for your work on your installer :-) > 1) boots from floppy or floppy image (like boot CD) > > (Note: if user manually lauches installer, skip 2 and goto 3) > > 2) Detects if latest FreeDOS version is installed (actual test not > written) If it is the latest version, returns

Re: [Freedos-devel] XFTOOLS - exFAT access a la LTOOLS

2015-10-01 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Rugxulo, as mentioned earlier in this thread, generic operating systems are allowed to implement VFAT (FAT32 and LFN) without fees, so I would not be too worried about those two more years. Regarding LTOOLS quality: This thing is ancient and of course it supports only ext2, not ext3 or ext4.