I was just wondering why freedos is not listed on fsf (free software
foundation) ?
I think that freedos deserve a spot here
http://www.gnu.org/distros/free-non-gnu-distros.html (above Replicant) so that
more users may discover and enjoy freedos.
Hello all,
Just released FDI Preview 12.
Some major non-UI underlying changes, for better performance and compatibility.
Too many improvements and far to many things to list. Hopefully, this will be
the last
preview before FreeDOS 1.2 beta. Next, I intend on looking through the package
lists
Not all parts of FreeDOS meet the FSF's requirements[0]. One, it's
not a "GNU/Linux" system. Two, there are few tools in BASE [1] which
are open source but not necessarily 4 freedoms OSS [2]. Jack Ellis'
work and SHSUCDX being prime examples.
[0]
Agreed. Also, I recall Stallman didn't like the license used in the
OpenWatcom compiler. And that the kernel couldn't be compiled using an
entirely free software tool chain.
On Feb 10, 2016 5:15 PM, "Louis Santillan" wrote:
>
> Not all parts of FreeDOS meet the FSF's
On Feb 10, 2016 7:14 PM, "Jim Hall" wrote:
>
> Agreed. Also, I recall Stallman didn't like the license used in the
OpenWatcom compiler. And that the kernel couldn't be compiled using an
entirely free software tool chain.
>
>
Or at least what he considered "free software" tool
On 2/10/2016 5:17 PM, Jim Hall wrote:
On Feb 10, 2016 7:14 PM, "Jim Hall" > wrote:
>
> Agreed. Also, I recall Stallman didn't like the license used in the
OpenWatcom compiler. And that the kernel couldn't be compiled using an
entirely free
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Henrik Schick-Hansen
wrote:
>
> I was just wondering why freedos is not listed on fsf (free software
> foundation) ?
>
> I think that freedos deserve a spot here
> http://www.gnu.org/distros/free-non-gnu-distros.html (above