Hi,
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Tom Ehlert wrote:
>
> as an anecdote: in 2001, the official compiler was MSC 6.0 and MASM.
> nobody cared either, and everybody used happily the (free) Turbo C 2.01
> and TCPP 1.0.
IIRC, Pat V. himself wanted the kernel to be able to build with
relatively
I currently have 4 projects in my queue for NEW programs for DOS. Once I
finish those, I'd be happy to collaborate in translating the base system
to Watcom.
Happy Hacking,
David E. McMackins II
Supporting Member, Electronic Frontier Foundation (#2296972)
Associate Member, Free Software
For at least several months, I've had this on the Contribute page:
http://www.freedos.org/contribute/
- Port FreeDOS utilities to OpenWatcom C and NASM (currently our
preferred C compiler and Assembler for FreeDOS)
So we're trying to encourage folks to Port these programs to an open
DFLAT+ is available at ibiblio:
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/devel/libs/dflat/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Remitente:Tom Ehlert
Destinatario: Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers.
Fecha:
> While I was doing something else, I went on a tangent that led me to
> look at the FreeDOS EDIT source code. I noticed some problems.
> The first of these problems is that it appears at first glance EDIT has
> a build dependency on Borland C. At least, there isn't a build script
> for any
While I was doing something else, I went on a tangent that led me to
look at the FreeDOS EDIT source code. I noticed some problems.
The first of these problems is that it appears at first glance EDIT has
a build dependency on Borland C. At least, there isn't a build script
for any other compiler.
