In DOSbox info-zips zip16 and unzip runs fairly well (with cycles = max
95%) if I remember correctly
Den ons 22 aug. 2018 22:04Rugxulo skrev:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 7:07 AM Tom Ehlert wrote:
>
>>
>> as a side note: I have no experience with UNZIP.EXE in DOS, but I think
>> it's
AFAIK, VT-X is basically hardware-level support for virtualization and it does
help noticeably. Without it, the VM hypervisor must do all that work in
software. It kinda works like hardware acceleration for graphics in a video
card.
There's my two cents lol
Sent with
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 7:07 AM Tom Ehlert wrote:
>
> as a side note: I have no experience with UNZIP.EXE in DOS, but I think
> it's performance pathetically slow. is this normal?
>
Under VM? Yes, "unzip" is specifically known to be much slower than normal.
I'm not exactly sure why. Like I
Hi Rugxulo,
> I know this was not a great bug report.
Yes indeed.
> In fact, I wasn't trying to be
> too specific, just mentioning that some random and confusing stuff was
> happening.
to start with, you didn't mention even METADOS, or even what version
of it, or even where to download it.
so
BAT language is indeed very weak but is has few hacks.
One of them is the possibility of carrying the tiny COM binaries inside.
You can call command ECHO [ascii-compatible-Binary-code] > HELPER.COM
The question is how often is possible to carry such COM files but generaly
it should be possible.
