Long story short: Doszip is pretty perfect unless you need 8086 support.
http://sf.net/projects/doszip
(Anyways, a decent file manager isn't essential by any means, and
surely there are dozens of other file managers, I'm probably
forgetting a few. Maybe they're open source, who knows, I
I don't know that I've used this DOSSHELL before. I just tried it now,
and once I got used to the key commands, it seemed easy to use, and
very nice.
The source requires Microsoft BASIC Compiler to build. Is there a free
version of Microsoft BASIC Compiler (DOS) out there? I haven't found
it on
Hi,
On 7/17/11, Jim Hall jh...@freedos.org wrote:
I don't know that I've used this DOSSHELL before. I just tried it now,
and once I got used to the key commands, it seemed easy to use, and
very nice.
It looks okay, but it's fairly minimal. I'd heavily prefer Doszip, honestly.
The source
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011, Rugxulo wrote:
Hi,
On 7/17/11, Jim Hall jh...@freedos.org wrote:
I don't know that I've used this DOSSHELL before. I just tried it now,
and once I got used to the key commands, it seemed easy to use, and
very nice.
It looks okay, but it's fairly minimal. I'd heavily
Op 17-7-2011 23:01, Jim Hall schreef:
To keep FreeDOS free we need to use free software tools wherever
possible. That's why we encourage NASM and OpenWatcom, and other free
tools. We have a few programs still that use Borland's TurboC
compiler, but I believe this is still available for free
Hi,
On 7/17/11, Steve Nickolas lyricalnan...@usotsuki.hoshinet.org wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011, Rugxulo wrote:
Doszip at least can build with OpenWatcom and JWasm, so that's good.
Can the 16-bit version of DOS Navigator be made to build on OpenWatcom?
That's a pretty good shell (Norton
