Re: [Freedos-devel] Severe bug in kernel 2040

2011-05-19 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Bart Oldeman bartolde...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: On 18 May 2011 11:04, Ladislav Lacina la...@seznam.cz wrote: I found severe incompatibility between new SVN kernel 2040 and LD.EXE in version 2.9.1. LD.EXE is part of DJGPP or Freepascal. It is not

Re: [Freedos-devel] Severe bug in kernel 2040

2011-05-19 Thread Bart Oldeman
On 19 May 2011 06:50, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com wrote: But honestly, this is a weird bug, surely LD itself (from GNU) didn't explicitly do this, did it? (I mean, why would it?) Mustn't it be a DJGPP libc bug? But 2.9.1 is old old old (latest is 2.21 !!) from May 1998, apparently, which

Re: [Freedos-devel] Severe bug in kernel 2040 - offtopic about Freepascal

2011-05-19 Thread Ladislav Lacina
Thanks for the explanation, esp. since Laaca really loves his oldy-moldy FPC 1.0.10. ;-)(Laaca, is latest FPC still not as good? You'd know better than me, but I thought most regressions were fixed by now, not to mention copious improvements.) Well, I guess I'll just quote your site (

Re: [Freedos-devel] Severe bug in kernel 2040 - offtopic about Freepascal

2011-05-19 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, 2011/5/19 Ladislav Lacina la...@seznam.cz: Yes, I like the FPC 1.0.10. The IDE is a little bit unstable and there are bugs in Ansistrings and sometimes failing type control but all important components work. Well, Marcov is a bit less tolerant of it than you (inline asm and calling