=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Remitente: Steve Nickolas
Destinatario: "Bitácora de Javier Gutiérrez Chamorro (Gu\\" <"Bitácora de
Javier Gutiérrez Chamorro (Gu\\">
Fecha: miércoles, 14 de septiembre de 2022, 14:42:02
Asunto:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022, Bitácora de Javier Gutiérrez Chamorro (Guti) wrote:
Dear Jim, There is no practical purpose on my mind, just the challenge
of rapidly and efficiently convert it. As you said, both CLS and VERIFY
are internal commands.
What surprised me about your ANSI fallback is that
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Remitente: Jim Hall
Destinatario: Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers.
Fecha: miércoles, 14 de septiembre de 2022, 14:00:14
Asunto: [Freedos-devel] CLS reimplementation (Re:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 6:24 AM Javier Gutiérrez Chamorro
wrote:
>
> And now it is the turn of CLS (sorry Jim ;-) It reproduces the same
> CLS.C behaviour, including the redirection detection, but instead of
> a 9,080 bytes CLS.EXE it creates a 380 bytes CLS.COM.
>
> What I did not like about the
And now it is the turn of CLS (sorry Jim ;-)
It reproduces the same CLS.C behaviour, including the redirection
detection, but instead of a 9,080 bytes CLS.EXE it creates a 380 bytes
CLS.COM.
What I did not like about the original C implementation was the use of the
non-portable clrscr() which is
I am not sure if it could be useful for anyone, but I have just
reimplemented VERIFY.COM by Peter Mikalajunas -1995- (
https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/verify/) in
pure assembler. It is not a big deal, but was a personal challenge. With
this main .COM executable gets
