[Freedos-devel] Announce: ZEROFILL

This is only to inform you about ZEROFILL, a small DOS utility to clean up free drive space in order to make easy to compact it with virtual machine software. The binaries as well as the source code is available at http://guti.is-great.org/static.php?page=ZEROFILL

Re: [Freedos-devel] Multi user system

Have you considered hosting in on Sourceforge or Github? =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Remitente:imre.le...@telenet.be imre.le...@telenet.be Destinatario: Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers.

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Live CD Disribution - FreeDOS B

Have you considered my ZEROFILL, which is already open source? http://nikkhokkho.sourceforge.net/static.php?page=ZEROFILL =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Remitente:Ercan Ersoy Destinatario:

[Freedos-devel] 4DOS compiled with OpenWatcom

When Revived 4DOS started, I read about they achieved to built it with Open Watcom 1.8, instead of Visual C++ 1.52 as 7.50. Any one tried? How the performace between both compare? Thanks.-- Check out the vibrant tech

[Freedos-devel] REBOOT 1.00

I have release a simple reboot.com tool for DOS, performing a DOS warm boot. It is available in source and binary forms at: http://www.javiergutierrezchamorro.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/reboot.zip Of course it is not as complete as fdapm, but should be interesting for

Re: [Freedos-devel] Linux commands in DOS - Minibox

Thanks. But looking at the source commited 20 minutes ago, it seems that no commands are yet implemented, it is only like a stub. I am curious why it need DPMI and DJGPP for that? It is not enought Watcom C++ in 16 bit real mode?

[Freedos-devel] Fast Compiler manual

Does anyone know where to obtain the FAST reference manual, that was sent when registering the program? It is a bit tedious trying to figure its capabilities by looking at the source code.-- Check out the vibrant tech

Re: [Freedos-devel] Fast Compiler manual

Just if anyone is interested, I was able to find old HLP files with Fast 2.61. A pitty they are not updated to 2.92. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Remitente:Bitácora de Javier Gutiérrez Chamorro Destinatario:

Re: [Freedos-devel] Small Linux commands for DOS - DOS Coreutils

It seems that cp command is not copying the file, but creating a link to it. On pwd and rmdir help, you are still referencing MINIBOX. Hope you will have enough time to finish them. I am again wondering by the need of DJGPP, and CWSDPI. I do not see any huge requirements, most of the commands

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS TUI Shell Development has been Started

Gitlab link is dead. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Remitente:Ercan Ersoy Destinatario: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Fecha:martes, 27 de junio de 2017, 17:21:29

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS PASSWORD executable size

Following your details, I can confirm it is UPXed. I have unpacked it, and increased from 8264 bytes up to 17424 bytes. Then I examined the headers, and according to the signatures (Portions Copyright (c) 1983,92 Borland) it should be Turbo/Borland Pascal 7 compiled. Hope that helps.

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Branded C/C++ Toolchain

I am sure Jiri will be interested in those DOS library enhancements: https://github.com/open-watcom/open-watcom-v2 As for the fork, I see an additional problem, that will be outdated since it will not contain latest fixed by Jiri.

Re: [Freedos-devel] Arduino Port of FreeDOS

It is a complex task, to be honest. Why not focus in finishing Coreutils or FreeDOS TUI? =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Remitente:Ercan Ersoy Destinatario: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Freedos-devel] Arduino Port of FreeDOS

If is a matter of suggestion, I would say x86 32 bit protected mode would be easier and more useful. I still remember the dead FreeDOS-32. Anyway I guess real issue is time and motivation to code, not ideas. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Re: [Freedos-devel] Arduino Port of FreeDOS

and am still working on it, along with a small group of folks who are interested. On 01/13/2018 03:49 AM, Bitácora de Javier Gutiérrez Chamorro (Guti) wrote: If is a matter of suggestion, I would say x86 32 bit protected mode would be easier and more useful. I still remember the dead FreeDOS-3

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeCOM 0.84-pre3 prerelease

Thanks Bart. Amazing OW build is more compact than TC one. Pretty fine! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Remitente:Bart Oldeman Destinatario: Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers.

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compiling EDIT with free software

DFLAT+ is available at ibiblio: http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/devel/libs/dflat/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Remitente:Tom Ehlert Destinatario: Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers. Fecha:

[Freedos-devel] ANSIPLUS 4.07

Surprisingly, and luckily, ANSIPLUS has been updated to 4.07: http://www.sweger.com/ansiplus/Download.html___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Re: [Freedos-devel] Fastest way to start programming for DOS

That will be my point too. Problem on developing for DOS is usually you are not allow to debug, unless in DOS. Exception is OpenWatcom, which will be my choice. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Remitente:Robert Riebisch Destinatario:

Re: [Freedos-devel] Jordan Hargraphix SvgaBGI goes MIT license

I used them in the past but soon moved to SVGA386.BGI by Ullrich von Bassewitz with are a lot of faster (https://www.von-bassewitz.de/uz/bgi.php) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Remitente:Robert Riebisch Destinatario: freedos-devel mailing

Re: [Freedos-devel] Jordan Hargraphix SvgaBGI goes MIT license

at least 3 monitors by fooling around with port-registers on my ridiculously expensive Realtek 512KB SVGA card in an attempt to initialize the weirdest 256-color modes, like 734x412 and somesuch. On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 at 07:55, Bitácora de Javier Gutiérrez Chamorro (Guti) wrote: > I used them in the p

[Freedos-devel] Pacific C

Not sure if anyone will be concerned but just found that ibiblio (https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/devel/c/pacific/) is mirroring the shareware version of Pacific C (circa 1998), while during 2000 they release the same version as freeware with no shareware nags. They can

[Freedos-devel] Pacific C Shareware version at ibiblio

Not sure if anyone will be concerned but just found that ibiblio (https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/devel/c/pacific/) is mirroring the shareware version of Pacific C (circa 1998), while during 2000 they release the same version as freeware with no shareware nags. They can

Re: [Freedos-devel] Pacific C Shareware version at ibiblio

Thank you for updating it Jim! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Remitente:Jim Hall Destinatario: Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers. Fecha:viernes, 2 de julio de 2021, 22:55:48 Asunto: [Freedos-devel]

Re: [Freedos-devel] Why there is no two versions of FreeDOS: 16 bits and 32 bits?

I do not think it will be that easy. It is probably hitting the 16 unsigned int range, and also accounting that large memory model only allows to allocate blocks of up to 64K (you are looking for huge).   =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Remitente:

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Interim Build T2210

I recall using it when it was qedit, and in version 2, when rewritten to C, the speed increase was noticeable. Good times! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Remitente:    Robert Riebisch Destinatario: 

Re: [Freedos-devel] CLS reimplementation (Re: VERIFY reimplementation)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Remitente:    Jim Hall Destinatario: Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers. Fecha:        miércoles, 14 de septiembre de 2022, 14:00:14 Asunto:       [Freedos-devel] CLS reimplementation (Re:

Re: [Freedos-devel] CLS reimplementation (Re: VERIFY reimplementation)

e de 2022, 14:42:02 Asunto:       [Freedos-devel] CLS reimplementation (Re: VERIFY reimplementation) Archivos:     --===-- On Wed, 14 Sep 2022, Bitácora de Javier Gutiérrez Chamorro (Guti) wrote: > Dear Jim,   There is no pract

Re: [Freedos-devel] VERIFY reimplementation

> I am not sure if it could be useful for anyone, but I have just reimplemented > VERIFY.COM by Peter Mikalajunas -1995- > (https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/verify/) in > pure assembler. It is not a big deal, but was a personal challenge. With this > main .COM

Re: [Freedos-devel] VERIFY reimplementation

> On Sep 14, 2022, at 3:11 AM, Javier Gutiérrez Chamorro > wrote: > I am not sure if it could be useful for anyone, but I have just reimplemented > VERIFY.COM by Peter Mikalajunas -1995- > (https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/verify/) in > pure assembler. It is not

Re: [Freedos-devel] MS-DOS 4.0 source released as open source under MIT license

Much more interesting is the multitasking version: https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/tree/main/v4.0-ozzie =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Remitente:Eric Auer via Freedos-devel Destinatario: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Fecha: