Bart Oldeman wrote:
On Sun, 9 May 2004, James Tabor wrote:


Hi Bart!
Bart Oldeman wrote:

Bart seems to be the only one with CVS access.
So, if no time, the CVS snapshots stay identical (because of no imports to CVS), and people can start creating their own patches against this CVS-release?


in stead of optimizing, is anyone of the kernel mailing list willing to review patches? I only can write pseudo code due to almost no knowledge of C, let alone DOS internals.
However I did find a number of (trivial) bugs and as Bart has no time,
I can try to correct a bug and let someone review it.
Then, after reviewing + correcting, a patch collection like Lucho had
could be prepared.
only essential thing, IMHO, is that CVS contents should not change.


MEM is Bart's tool, but it seems the changes are not so hard to make,
in particular the 1.0 Todo-list options. perhaps *even I* can provide a patch for some issues.


let's see if I can get some C experience.
so for now: no optimisations, no new features, just bug fixing patches.

is Lucho still (silently?) active?

Bernd



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver
higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3
_______________________________________________
Freedos-kernel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel

Reply via email to