On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, tom ehlert wrote:
one thing I don't understand:
MEM /F will show a 1K dataarea, between 2 FILES drivers, at ~2a6:0
this existed also in ke2033, and possibly before.
as it *seems* to be unused, what is it?
That would be the relocated EBDA. I should improve MEM to detect
Hi!
16--2004 20:30 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom ehlert) wrote to Bart Oldeman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
te into assembly, and I will never like #pragma aux, even if that saves a
te few byte.
Let me disagree with you. This is most valid and effective way to
control compiler - in given case describe
So, by all means, if you want to test it, download it.
If not, wait until the final release and then the next cycle of
improvements can be made. I think the largest test population in the
wild would be if Erwin Veermans included the testing kernel on his
Nwdsk (Netware bootdisk).
I
Hi!
14--2004 17:16 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bart Oldeman) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BO http://freedos.sourceforge.net/kernel/kernel.sys (45k)
BO The daily tarball is at the usual place (same directory, kernel.tgz, 334k)
BO pat34rc.zip in the same directory has a source diff (79k).
What is
Arkady V.Belousov schreef:
Fine. For the future: show URL for complete diff patch on the main
page, previous time I don't found it (if it was present). Also, when planned
2034 release? May be I wait this release and download it completely (instead
patch), if it will be soon?
the idea is to
Hi!
15--2004 01:16 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Blaauw) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
page, previous time I don't found it (if it was present). Also, when planned
2034 release? May be I wait this release and download it completely (instead
patch), if it will be soon?
BB the idea is to test *before*
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
BB I include this 2034 kernel in the next FreeDOS distribution, next Sunday.
BB there have been a few times where a kernel was released, and a few days
BB later a new kernel followed it because a larger public found a few bugs.
:) Kernel
