Hi Bart,
thanks for making the patch much shorter, very commitable now :-)
Why did our old code do that complex put bp at [bp+2] thing? And
what does the cpm_error jump decision now inverted patch mean?
Eric
This is a minimal fix for [entry.asm]
...
-pushbp
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Eric Auer e.a...@jpberlin.de wrote:
Hi Bart,
thanks for making the patch much shorter, very commitable now :-)
Why did our old code do that complex put bp at [bp+2] thing? And
don't know
what does the cpm_error jump decision now inverted patch mean?
skips
2009/5/1 Eric Auer e.a...@jpberlin.de:
Why did our old code do that complex put bp at [bp+2] thing?
I don't know; it is old code from Pat Villani. Perhaps it wanted to do an extra
pop bp from that place but bp was already set to sp so that would be
wrong too.
-pushbp
- Christian: entry.asm revamp to fix the CP/M call (review!)
http://sf.net/tracker/?func=3Ddetailaid=3D2421577group_id=3D5109atid=
=3D105109
anyone know of any CP/M like programs or applications to test these with?
There's some C library based on the CALL 5 but I never used it. My test
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Bart Oldeman
bartolde...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
...
This is a minimal fix for the kernel:
--- entry.asm (révision 1371)
+++ entry.asm (copie de travail)
...
This bug has been there since the DOS-C days by the way!
Bart
Thank you!
Patch committed
Hi Bart, admins, others,
Would you like to have access again? Should be no problem :-)
Sure!
Apparently only Aitor, Jim and Pat can give you SVN write
access but I think that would be a *very* nice idea... ;-).
I noticed Pat already uploaded your SYS OW 1.8 fix :-).
If you plan to patch
free time at last...
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Eric Auer e.a...@jpberlin.de wrote:
Hi Bart, admins, others,
Would you like to have access again? Should be no problem :-)
Sure!
Apparently only Aitor, Jim and Pat can give you SVN write
access but I think that would be a *very* nice
Hi Eric,
2009/4/25 Eric Auer e.a...@jpberlin.de:
Would you like to have access again? Should be no problem :-)
Sure!
Question about the change in OpenWatcom headers which
now apparently want 32 bit arguments for 16 bit values,
which breaks not only SYS but also other DOS apps:
- why did
Hi Bart,
here's a patch to be able to compile SYS with OW 1.8. I've lost SVN
commit access...
Would you like to have access again? Should be no problem :-)
+#if defined(__WATCOMC__) __WATCOMC__ 1280
unsigned short date, time;
+#else
+ unsigned date, time;
+#endif
Question about
Hi,
here's a patch to be able to compile SYS with OW 1.8. I've lost SVN
commit access (sorry Jim for not responding to your email, I was very
busy at the time), so I'm sending a patch in the hope somebody will
apply it.
Bart
Index: sys/sys.c
10 matches
Mail list logo
