Re: [Freedos-kernel] [Freedos-user] Any interest in 486, 586, 686 kernels?

2013-05-21 Thread Tom Ehlert
I'm not sure how you can say the FreeDOS project isn't interested in a BC5 kernel. because I was around when the kernel was ported to MSVC, BC5, OW (in that order) The BC5 makefiles I found in the kernel sources I didn't write. Bart last worked on them 9 years ago. right. an since OW became

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Any interest in 486, 586, 686 kernels?

2013-05-21 Thread Eric Auer
Hi! Your vision on DOS is somewhat, well, interesting ;-) So there is a lot to chat about, although I am not sure if the KERNEL list is the right place for this topic. DPMI: I would expect performance gain to be minimal. Maybe there could be Low/HMA/UMB memory savings with a different

Re: [Freedos-kernel] [Freedos-user] Any interest in 486, 586, 686 kernels?

2013-05-21 Thread Chris Evans
I still think having true functions in batch files would be a good thing turn batch files into more capable language On Tuesday, May 21, 2013, Eric Auer wrote: Hi! Your vision on DOS is somewhat, well, interesting ;-) So there is a lot to chat about, although I am not sure if the KERNEL