On 5/24/2015 9:31 PM, David Griffith wrote:
> I'm well aware of the distinction between and "foo.h". My
> problem is that with the Turbo C IDE, it just says that it can't find
> foo.h, even though foo.h is in the same directory as main.c. If I
> build using a Makefile, this isn't a problem.
We
On Sun, 24 May 2015, Ralf Quint wrote:
> On 5/24/2015 5:33 PM, David Griffith wrote:
>> It has been a long time since I've used the Turbo C 3.0 IDE and I'm
>> stumped on something very basic. I'm trying to figure out how to get an
>> existing project into the IDE. I've already figured out how to
On 5/24/2015 5:33 PM, David Griffith wrote:
> It has been a long time since I've used the Turbo C 3.0 IDE and I'm
> stumped on something very basic. I'm trying to figure out how to get an
> existing project into the IDE. I've already figured out how to create a
> .PRJ file, but when I go to build
It has been a long time since I've used the Turbo C 3.0 IDE and I'm
stumped on something very basic. I'm trying to figure out how to get an
existing project into the IDE. I've already figured out how to create a
.PRJ file, but when I go to build the project, the compiler can't find any
of my
Speaking for myself, I'm hardly qualified to say whether Windows or
Linux are reliable. I will only say that I prefer using Linux instead of
Windows, particularly due to these Windows viruses I've been hearing about.
As for FreeDOS, I will only say it allows me to use the New Deal Office
Suite
Hi,
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 3:48 AM, dmccunney wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 1:27 AM, Rugxulo wrote:
>>
>> Dennis, once again, you're on the wrong mailing list if you're going
>> to constantly harp on how obsolete and useless DOS is.
>
> Please learn to read. I never said DOS was useless - I
For a whish list It would be nice to add a version of xcopy that also
copies
hidden and system file. Also it would be nice to able to read Chinese
made UDF
cds on dos. Why do they use UDF on a read only cd; its suppose to be for
R/W cd's..
cheers
DS
On Sat, 16 May 2015 19:37:26 +0200 Mateusz V
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 1:27 AM, Rugxulo wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 11:21 PM, dmccunney wrote:
>> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Ralf Quint wrote:
>>
>>> The big question is if OpenWatcom continues to be a viable option to be
>>> used with FreeDOS. If the official site would be down for
