Re: [Freedos-user] Would you use a native 32/64-bit FreeDOS/BIOS system?

To add yet another personal view to this thread: > [...] Win10 and Linux. I have an assortment of old DOS apps that I > run using DOSBox, which was designed to let folks run old DOS games > on machines that aren't PCs. But also PCs that just do not run DOS as main OS. > [...] 23" 1920x1080

Re: [Freedos-user] Would you use a native 32/64-bit FreeDOS/BIOS system?

> The question is whether you need DOS > itself to do that. > I run Win10 and Linux. I have an > assortment of old DOS apps that I > run using DOSBox, which was designed > to let folks run old DOS games on > machines that aren't PCs. > Under Windows, I use vDOSPlus, which > is a fork of DOSBox

Re: [Freedos-user] Would you use a native 32/64-bit FreeDOS/BIOS system?

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Ray Davison wrote: > A small side trip about real work in real DOS. > > Since Win2K, my desktops have had a 2G, FAT16 primary at the front of the > first HDD, carrying DOS and a boot manager, and two Win partitions, both > logicals. Every

Re: [Freedos-user] Would you use a native 32/64-bit FreeDOS/BIOS system?

I'm like you I do all on book keeping and wordprocessing on dos. Its easier to use than windows. I run my software on cf chips. I plug them into adapters. I can remove the dos chip and carry it to another computer to continue my work. Something that can never work with windows. Tired of working in

Re: [Freedos-user] Would you use a native 32/64-bit FreeDOS/BIOS system?

A small side trip about real work in real DOS. Since Win2K, my desktops have had a 2G, FAT16 primary at the front of the first HDD, carrying DOS and a boot manager, and two Win partitions, both logicals. Every other partition is a logical. Using that layout I am now running FreeDOS 1.1 and