Hi Aitor,
Eric, was the windows (partial) support ever
ported to the stable kernel? (maybe that's why).
That partial support is based on heavy patches it
seems... As said, the windows 386 mode support even
in the unstable kernel is not compiled in by default
because it is more experimental
Eric, was the windows (partial) support ever ported to the stable
kernel? (maybe that's why).
Aitor
2009/4/12 Eric Auer e.a...@jpberlin.de:
Hi,
Not workgroup.
If I don't load emm386.exe, freedos version, I get an error that I
have an unsupported dos version.
If I try loading windows 3.1
Hi,
Not workgroup.
If I don't load emm386.exe, freedos version, I get an error that I
have an unsupported dos version.
If I try loading windows 3.1 in standard mode, I get an error that
there isn't enough extended memory.
Did you try using jemm386 instead? And of course: Maybe
you do not
Not workgroup.
If I don't load emm386.exe, freedos version, I get an error that I
have an unsupported dos version.
If I try loading windows 3.1 in standard mode, I get an error that
there isn't enough extended memory.
Uge!
If I don't load emm386.exe, freedos version, I get an error that I
have an unsupported dos version.
Load the microsoft version that comes with windows, himem too.
If I try loading windows 3.1 in standard mode, I get an error that
there isn't enough extended memory.
Uge!
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 14:34 -0700, Blair Campbell wrote:
If I don't load emm386.exe, freedos version, I get an error that I
have an unsupported dos version.
Load the microsoft version that comes with windows, himem too.
If I try loading windows 3.1 in standard mode, I get an error
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 15:35 -0700, Blair Campbell wrote:
If I don't load emm386.exe, freedos version, I get an error that I
have an unsupported dos version.
Load the microsoft version that comes with windows, himem too.
If I try loading windows 3.1 in standard mode, I get an
