Re: [Freedos-user] Some networking present

2020-09-07 Thread ZB
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 07:48:33PM +0200, Mateusz Viste wrote: > They are indeed - I've spent more nights than I can count debugging EtherDFS > and EthFlop while battling with random freezes, memory corruptions, suddenly > hanging games and such. TSRs are truly a toxic environment. But it's part

Re: [Freedos-user] Some networking present

2020-09-07 Thread Mateusz Viste
On 07/09/2020 18:15, Michael Brutman wrote: Others have provided small utilities to let WATTCP apps use the mTCP DHCP program.  I think that is a reasonable solution given the history. Interesting. Any links? mTCP seems to be quite popular nowadays - at least as much as Wattcp-based

Re: [Freedos-user] Some networking present

2020-09-07 Thread Michael Brutman
Thanks for the dictionary definition, but I think you missed the point here. mTCP != WATTCP, and I have no interest in WATTCP. WATTCP is a library and a set of programs from many contributors while mTCP is all my work. Being compatible with something that I originally had no knowledge of an no

Re: [Freedos-user] Some networking present

2020-09-07 Thread Mateusz Viste
On 07/09/2020 05:31, Michael Brutman wrote: "Exotic" is a strange word ... Let me help. Quick web search suggests such definition: "Intriguingly unusual or different" WATTCP uses its own configuration file, mTCP uses its own configuration file. My point exactly. There are users now that

Re: [Freedos-user] Some networking present

2020-09-06 Thread Michael Brutman
"Exotic" is a strange word ... WATTCP uses its own configuration file, mTCP uses its own configuration file. I knew about Trumpet when I started mTCP but not WATTCP. After WATTCP came to my attentioned I looked at it and determined that I would continue to do my own thing. You did write

Re: [Freedos-user] Some networking present

2020-09-06 Thread Mateusz Viste
The FreeDOS wiki links to a website that no longer exists. Yes, 12 years ago it was saying "provided free without support.": https://web.archive.org/web/20081002025059/http://www.trumpet.com.au:80/dosapps/ Today, however, the author's page does not feature such phrase - only a list of

Re: [Freedos-user] Some networking present

2020-09-06 Thread ZB
On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 02:07:43PM -0400, dmccunney wrote: > See http://wiki.freedos.org/wiki/index.php/Networking_FreeDOS_-_NTCPDRV Thanks, I can see there confirmation it's free for personal use: #v+ Licensing issues on this site are kept short and simple: "These DOS applications are

Re: [Freedos-user] Some networking present

2020-09-06 Thread dmccunney
On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 2:02 PM ZB wrote: > On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 07:52:05PM +0200, Mateusz Viste wrote: > > > And the Trumpet TSR itself does not appear to be free: > > http://www.trumpet.com.au/index.php/products/tcpip-driver.html > > From what I see there it's paid only for >=10 units (so

Re: [Freedos-user] Some networking present

2020-09-06 Thread ZB
On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 07:52:05PM +0200, Mateusz Viste wrote: > And the Trumpet TSR itself does not appear to be free: > http://www.trumpet.com.au/index.php/products/tcpip-driver.html >From what I see there it's paid only for >=10 units (so probably in case of "corporate use" or similar) --

Re: [Freedos-user] Some networking present

2020-09-06 Thread Mateusz Viste
On 06/09/2020 19:18, ZB wrote: Perhaps it could be feasible to improve the programs to make them follow such simple algorithm: 1. Let's find out, maybe Trumpet TSR offers its services? 2. If it's present, connect using Trumpet... This is twice the programming work required for networking. Not

Re: [Freedos-user] Some networking present

2020-09-06 Thread ZB
On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 06:43:34PM +0200, Mateusz Viste wrote: > Trumpet is a networking TSR, while Wattcp, Watt-32 and mTCP are libraries > embedded into the executable. Completely different approaches. Perhaps it could be feasible to improve the programs to make them follow such simple

Re: [Freedos-user] Some networking present

2020-09-06 Thread Mateusz Viste
On 06/09/2020 17:03, ZB wrote: Gopherus works (although still it wants to configure network, that already has been configured using mTCP's DHCP; so it seems Gopherus doesn't do any detection "do I already have network acccessibler?" at all), mTCP is kind of an exotic piece of software - its

Re: [Freedos-user] Some networking present

2020-09-06 Thread ZB
On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 03:49:41PM +0200, Mateusz Viste wrote: > Sounds good indeed. Is FDNPKG or Gopherus working as well? They rely on > Watt-32 and Wattcp, respectively. The latter does not have DHCP support > IIRC. Now it sounds even better: after I downloaded newest versions of mTCP package

Re: [Freedos-user] Some networking present

2020-09-06 Thread ZB
On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 03:49:41PM +0200, Mateusz Viste wrote: > Sounds good indeed. Is FDNPKG or Gopherus working as well? They rely on > Watt-32 and Wattcp, respectively. The latter does not have DHCP support > IIRC. No, they don't work with my configuration. Although I have network "up and

Re: [Freedos-user] Some networking present

2020-09-06 Thread Mateusz Viste
On 06/09/2020 02:33, ZB wrote: Anyway I was able to ping and to log into FTP server - so I can assume network is present Sounds good indeed. Is FDNPKG or Gopherus working as well? They rely on Watt-32 and Wattcp, respectively. The latter does not have DHCP support IIRC. Mateusz

[Freedos-user] Some networking present

2020-09-05 Thread ZB
Partial success - it turned out I was expecting too much. I still cannot rely on the tools shipped with FreeDOS (I mean the ones by M. Brutman) - but some of the utilities from that old Trumpet 2.01 package seem to work, just they are (compared to Linux tools) rather cumbersome, that's why I