Re: [Freedos-user] Installation as standalone system

2016-02-03 Thread Wayne Dernoncourt
There is no need for sound, I don't think I even need a network connection.  
I'm looking to get a system that is at least 3-4 years old, maybe even older.  
The only reason to get a newer one is to get some extra speed.

This clown speaks for himself

> On Feb 3, 2016, at 1:33 PM, Corbin Davenport  
> wrote:
> 
> I would think FreeDOS would work fine on any PC with legacy boot enabled, but 
> extra stuff like USB, sound, and/or networking might need extra drivers that 
> might not be available.
> 
> Corbin
> 
>> On Feb 3, 2016 12:57 PM, "Wayne Dernoncourt"  wrote:
>> I'm planning to install Free-DOS on a standalone system to run SpinRite.  
>> I've had issues in getting FreeDOS to boot successfully on some systems (the 
>> systems seems to hang on Init...)
>> 
>> So I decided to get an older desktop with a plan to wipeout what I expect 
>> will be Windows and install FreeDOS.  I would to minimize the number of 
>> systems I need to get before being successful at getting FreeDOS to boot, 
>> what are the characteristics I need to look for.
>> 
>> BTW the Dell laptop I bought for this works pretty well, but I'm going to 
>> have problems mounting other desktop hard drives to the laptop that the 
>> desktop controller can deal with.  As I understand things, USB limits the 
>> info coming back from the drive.
>> 
>> This clown speaks for himself
>> --
>> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
>> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
>> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
>> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311=/4140
>> ___
>> Freedos-user mailing list
>> Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
> --
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151=/4140
> ___
> Freedos-user mailing list
> Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
--
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151=/4140___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 Preview 11

2016-02-03 Thread Jerome Shidel
Hello Don,

> On Feb 3, 2016, at 1:47 PM, Don Flowers  wrote:
> 
> Day after observation: I am getting an A: drive redirect when I try to copy 
> files by "COPY" command. One file will copy to the desired directory and then 
> it  searches for the A: drive. Would this be a glitch from the installer?
> 

I'm not sure exactly what you mean.

Is this the installed system, or when booted from floppy or USB image?

Also, is this what you mean?

cd c:
copy myfile.txt fdos\myfile.txt
copy myfile2.txt fdos\myfile2.txt
INSERT DISK IN DRIVE A:

Or do you mean something else entirely?

Jerome

Sent from my iPhone, ignore bad sentence structures, grammatical errors and 
incorrect spell-corrected words.


--
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151=/4140
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 Preview 11

2016-02-03 Thread Don Flowers
It's the installed system - what was happening  was
I would type: "COPY *.ZIP  C:\DOWNLOAD\ZIP"
One file would copy to c:\download\zip, then the a: drive would  click and
I got the ever annoying "error copying to a: drive abort retry ignore?"; I
could ignore and it would stop but the copy processed stopped as well. If I
repeat the process I get a clean copy of all files.
I solved the problem by rearranging the autoexec paths (FDAUTO for me :^)
and setting an absolute path for C:\;C:\FDOS;C:\FDOS\BIN





On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Jerome Shidel  wrote:

> Hello Don,
>
> > On Feb 3, 2016, at 1:47 PM, Don Flowers  wrote:
> >
> > Day after observation: I am getting an A: drive redirect when I try to
> copy files by "COPY" command. One file will copy to the desired directory
> and then it  searches for the A: drive. Would this be a glitch from the
> installer?
> >
>
> I'm not sure exactly what you mean.
>
> Is this the installed system, or when booted from floppy or USB image?
>
> Also, is this what you mean?
>
> cd c:
> copy myfile.txt fdos\myfile.txt
> copy myfile2.txt fdos\myfile2.txt
> INSERT DISK IN DRIVE A:
>
> Or do you mean something else entirely?
>
> Jerome
>
> Sent from my iPhone, ignore bad sentence structures, grammatical errors
> and incorrect spell-corrected words.
>
>
>
> --
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151=/4140
> ___
> Freedos-user mailing list
> Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
>
--
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151=/4140___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 Preview 11

2016-02-03 Thread Jerome Shidel


Hello Don,

> On Feb 3, 2016, at 6:50 PM, Don Flowers  wrote:
> 
> It's the installed system - what was happening  was 
> I would type: "COPY *.ZIP  C:\DOWNLOAD\ZIP"
> One file would copy to c:\download\zip, then the a: drive would  click and I 
> got the ever annoying "error copying to a: drive abort retry ignore?"; I 
> could ignore and it would stop but the copy processed stopped as well. If I 
> repeat the process I get a clean copy of all files. 
> I solved the problem by rearranging the autoexec paths (FDAUTO for me :^) and 
> setting an absolute path for C:\;C:\FDOS;C:\FDOS\BIN
> 
> 
> 

Interesting, if changing the chaning them path variable order fixed the issue. 
It would not be a bug or other issue in the installer.

Thanks for the update.

Jerome

> 
> 
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Jerome Shidel  wrote:
>> Hello Don,
>> 
>> > On Feb 3, 2016, at 1:47 PM, Don Flowers  wrote:
>> >
>> > Day after observation: I am getting an A: drive redirect when I try to 
>> > copy files by "COPY" command. One file will copy to the desired directory 
>> > and then it  searches for the A: drive. Would this be a glitch from the 
>> > installer?
>> >
>> 
>> I'm not sure exactly what you mean.
>> 
>> Is this the installed system, or when booted from floppy or USB image?
>> 
>> Also, is this what you mean?
>> 
>> cd c:
>> copy myfile.txt fdos\myfile.txt
>> copy myfile2.txt fdos\myfile2.txt
>> INSERT DISK IN DRIVE A:
>> 
>> Or do you mean something else entirely?
>> 
>> Jerome
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone, ignore bad sentence structures, grammatical errors and 
>> incorrect spell-corrected words.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
>> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
>> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
>> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151=/4140
>> ___
>> Freedos-user mailing list
>> Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
> 
> --
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151=/4140
> ___
> Freedos-user mailing list
> Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
--
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151=/4140___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Cobalt - my FreeDOS distribution

2016-02-03 Thread John R. Sowden

When I clicked on the iso link, I got the following:


This XML file does not appear to have any style information 
associated with it. The document tree is shown below.
NoSuchKeyThe specified key does not 
exist.releases/50886493/4fb4d114-c933-11e5-9bf4-8e8a690fb98a.iso85117D7417E47724hJzwQuKFwih9sa3LSZ8nelMuDFPUBxxnwGSRhRlYlJWhqiSB2QDHTgorWNOaemkZ


I'm running xubuntu 15.04 and Firefox 44.0


John
--
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151=/4140___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


[Freedos-user] Installation as standalone system

2016-02-03 Thread Wayne Dernoncourt
I'm planning to install Free-DOS on a standalone system to run SpinRite.  I've 
had issues in getting FreeDOS to boot successfully on some systems (the systems 
seems to hang on Init...)

So I decided to get an older desktop with a plan to wipeout what I expect will 
be Windows and install FreeDOS.  I would to minimize the number of systems I 
need to get before being successful at getting FreeDOS to boot, what are the 
characteristics I need to look for.

BTW the Dell laptop I bought for this works pretty well, but I'm going to have 
problems mounting other desktop hard drives to the laptop that the desktop 
controller can deal with.  As I understand things, USB limits the info coming 
back from the drive.

This clown speaks for himself
--
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311=/4140
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Installation as standalone system

2016-02-03 Thread Corbin Davenport
I would think FreeDOS would work fine on any PC with legacy boot enabled,
but extra stuff like USB, sound, and/or networking might need extra drivers
that might not be available.

Corbin
On Feb 3, 2016 12:57 PM, "Wayne Dernoncourt"  wrote:

> I'm planning to install Free-DOS on a standalone system to run SpinRite.
> I've had issues in getting FreeDOS to boot successfully on some systems
> (the systems seems to hang on Init...)
>
> So I decided to get an older desktop with a plan to wipeout what I expect
> will be Windows and install FreeDOS.  I would to minimize the number of
> systems I need to get before being successful at getting FreeDOS to boot,
> what are the characteristics I need to look for.
>
> BTW the Dell laptop I bought for this works pretty well, but I'm going to
> have problems mounting other desktop hard drives to the laptop that the
> desktop controller can deal with.  As I understand things, USB limits the
> info coming back from the drive.
>
> This clown speaks for himself
>
> --
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311=/4140
> ___
> Freedos-user mailing list
> Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
>
--
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151=/4140___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 Preview 11

2016-02-03 Thread Don Flowers
Day after observation: I am getting an A: drive redirect when I try to copy
files by "COPY" command. One file will copy to the desired directory and
then it  searches for the A: drive. Would this be a glitch from the
installer?

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. 
wrote:

>
> > On Feb 2, 2016, at 7:54 PM, Eric Auer  wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> >>> Well that is still serious. Even if you do something as harmless as
> >>>
> >>> copy STUFF SOMEWHERE | more
> >>>
> >>> you would still end up 1. not seeing the output of "copy" and
> >>> possibly even 2. block the "copy" process by stalling the pipe.
> >>>
> >>> In short, please use a ramdisk for all your pipe and temp work :-)
> >>
> >> Yeah, probably not going to do that. It adds to much complication
> >> to the installer startup. It would need to be very small and that
> >> may risk package installation failure later on with fdinst.
> >
> > That is exactly why I recommend using a ramdisk: Without ramdisk,
> > everything sent through pipes goes to a digital black hole when
> > the install disk is not writeable, risking plenty of side effects.
> >
> > For piping stuff, a tiny ramdisk will be enough. If you assume that
> > a computer which can boot from CD / DVD / USB has, say, at least 16
> > MB RAM (yes youngsters, not 16 GB ;-)) then you could use 4 for the
> > cache and 1 for the ramdisk and have 10 left for installer / unzip
> > 32 bit activities still. So a bit of a ramdisk is totally harmless!
>
> It really isn’t needed.
>
> >
> > By the way, how about creating a 600 MB RAMDISK (no joke) whenever
> > the installer detects 1 GB or more RAM? That would allow users to
> > do a full install to the ramdisk, effectively using your installer
> > stick as a "LIVE CD" without install and without rebooting :-)
>
> No reason, someone can not create an simple batch called something
> like GOLIVE.BAT that could be included with the CD ISO. It could handle
> all of that post-boot. Also, with how the installer is designed. A drop in
> could even be included to do it when the user exits the installer without
> performing an install.
>
> >
> >> if a user did not boot the install media and just runs it from
> >> the command line, a pre-existing ramdisk may cause issues or be
> >> forcefully unloaded. It is also an additional driver to load.
> >
> > Ramdisks are pretty compatible and I see no reason why loading more
> > than one of them would cause any troubles. Also, my suggestion was
> > to load a ramdisk in CONFIG & AUTOEXEC. Everybody who manually wants
> > to start the installer from the command line of their existing DOS
> > or Windows can be expected to know what they do, so I agree to not
> > bother those by loading DRIVERS as side effect of installer start.
> >
> > Maybe this is a good topic for review! As the moment, which steps
> > do you take in CONFIG / AUTOEXEC and which steps, apart from the
> > scripted invocation of (after optional fdisk and format) the DOS
> > package manager and the creation of a target config and autoexec,
> > are taken by the installer itself? Thanks for giving an overview!
>
> The entire installer is modular, customizable and extensible.
> Other than at startup with language selection and initial target
> verification, the installer performs no further actions until the
> user makes the final “install now” selection. This with drop
> in package lists, advanced mode, error handling screens and
> all of the other steps it takes during execution. All logic is handled
> inside the batch files that make up the installer. There is a rough
> draft developer manual on the github source page that goes into
> basic detail on what most of the different parts of the installer handle.
>
> >
> >> There is an easy way around the issue. I will probably just have the
> >> installer test if C: is the USB stick prior to activating the TEMP
> >> directory.
> >
> > That will not work with PLOP, nor will it work with "booting from
> > a harddisk image on CD or DVD", as those are all write-protected
> > simulations of a C: harddisk as far as my intuition tells me that.
>
> Actually, the installer already does this in automatic target drive
> detection. That is how it knows to install to D: automatically. But,
> on some systems the USB drive is not C:, the installer automatically
> targets C:. It shouldn’t be difficult to include some of this logic
> into the initial (for settings import) TEMP directory setup.
>
> >
> >> The batch file based FDI installer would not be very good without any
> >> pipes. It would have almost no flexibility at all. Would only have
> >> hard coded package lists and would not be able to dynamically
> >> create customized system configuration files.
> >
> > You can do a lot with errorlevels and you can select packages AFTER
> > selecting the target drive: By definition, as soon as the user has
> > selected (and maybe formatted) a target drive, you can write it :-)
>
>