On Jun 24, 2011, at 5:11 AM, Eric Auer e.a...@jpberlin.de wrote:
Hi all,
I hope you noticed the comment at the end saying that Aitor is NOT
actually the sender of this mail. Among others hops, it came along
the German Alice DSL IP 85.177.229.61 - the mail header says this:
This
Hi all,
I hope you noticed the comment at the end saying that Aitor is NOT
actually the sender of this mail. Among others hops, it came along
the German Alice DSL IP 85.177.229.61 - the mail header says this:
This message did not originate from the Sender address above. It was
remailed
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 04:12 +0200, japhethx gmail wrote:
[snip] I think
everybody has learned the last years that GPL software can be used
without any second thoughts and distributed freely.[snip]
No.
Yes, that's a huge strong point. As long as you provide access to the
complete source
-Original Message-
From: Michael C. Robinson [mailto:plu...@robinson-west.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 2:35 AM
To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Basic networking abilities
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 04:12 +0200, japhethx gmail wrote:
[snip
Am 01.06.2011 04:49, schrieb Michael B. Brutman:
On 5/31/2011 2:23 AM, Marcos Favero Florence de Barros wrote:
Hi Ulrich, Michael, others,
Now that mTCP is Free Software, I think the next version of
FreeDOS should focus on getting basic networking abilities.
That's wonderful news :-)
On 6/1/2011 5:30 PM, Ulrich Hansen wrote:
Actually this is not really news but just a wish from my side. The
discussion what*s part of FreeDOS 1.1 takes place since some time at
freedos-devel. I think the developers decide, while we users should
publish our expectations and wishes.
So I
[snip] I think
everybody has learned the last years that GPL software can be used
without any second thoughts and distributed freely.[snip]
No.
I am also a real fan of the Free Software idea. Otherwise I wouldn't
use FreeDOS (which is released under the GPL as well). Some developers
may
