Hi Artur
Artur Hecker wrote:
hi
Yes, the EAP document with the FreeRADIUS 0.7 tar ball indicates that
OpenSSL 0.9.6b or later (for example, 0.9.6c - 0.9.6g) should work.
Others were having problems with that release, so I tried it, verified
that it didn't work, tried to find out why it
hi
Yes, the EAP document with the FreeRADIUS 0.7 tar ball indicates that
OpenSSL 0.9.6b or later (for example, 0.9.6c - 0.9.6g) should work.
Others were having problems with that release, so I tried it, verified
that it didn't work, tried to find out why it doesn't work (rlm needs
more
Aron Silverton[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The necessary OpenSSL functions were not added until 0.9.7 as found in
the SSL_CTX_set_msg_callback.pod. Does anybody know if there is any
reason why a 0.9.7-beta, stable snapshot, or snapshot would be prefered
over the others?
No real reason. But
Alan DeKok wrote:
Aron Silverton[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The necessary OpenSSL functions were not added until 0.9.7 as found in
the SSL_CTX_set_msg_callback.pod. Does anybody know if there is any
reason why a 0.9.7-beta, stable snapshot, or snapshot would be prefered
over the others?
hi
Exactly. Which is strange that it did compile with 0.9.6b. I didn't
capture all of the output, so I'm not sure what, if anything, it said
about the function calls.
For the record, the stable snapshot of OpenSSL 0.9.7 from 2002-10-30
works fine. Maybe Raghu can update the EAP
Artur Hecker wrote:
hi
Exactly. Which is strange that it did compile with 0.9.6b. I didn't
capture all of the output, so I'm not sure what, if anything, it said
about the function calls.
For the record, the stable snapshot of OpenSSL 0.9.7 from 2002-10-30
works fine. Maybe Raghu can
Alan DeKok wrote:
Jason Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've compiled up 0.7 successfully under Redhat 7.2 with openssl-0.9.6b, but
when I try to use xsuplicant on a WLAN Linux client, radiusd crashes:
Uh, no. Your shared libraries are set up wrong. The server asks to
do run-time
Ok, I read the original post more closely and maybe he was having both
problems: wrong OpenSSL at first and then linker problems after that. I
know that I wasn't having the linker issues.
The necessary OpenSSL functions were not added until 0.9.7 as found in
the SSL_CTX_set_msg_callback.pod.
Jason Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've compiled up 0.7 successfully under Redhat 7.2 with openssl-0.9.6b, but
when I try to use xsuplicant on a WLAN Linux client, radiusd crashes:
Uh, no. Your shared libraries are set up wrong. The server asks to
do run-time linking, and *your* run-time
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 09:35:22AM -0400, Alan DeKok wrote:
Jason Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've compiled up 0.7 successfully under Redhat 7.2 with openssl-0.9.6b, but
when I try to use xsuplicant on a WLAN Linux client, radiusd crashes:
Uh, no. Your shared libraries are set up
Please note that WEP is not yet supported in freeradius
Is that still the case? The whole reason we're looking at EAP-TLS is to work
around the gross security problems with WLANs - and EAP-TLS provides that
protection by dynamically generating WEP session keys...
there is a patch which
there is a patch which should be already integrated in the release which
supports that. if it doesn't grep the maillist archives for it, it was
oups: if it ISN'T of course...
--
Artur Hecker
artur[at]hecker.info
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
Hi there
I've compiled up 0.7 successfully under Redhat 7.2 with openssl-0.9.6b, but
when I try to use xsuplicant on a WLAN Linux client, radiusd crashes:
modcall: group authorize returns updated
rad_check_password: Found Auth-Type EAP
auth: type EAP
modcall: entering group authenticate
13 matches
Mail list logo
