Re: Cisco VPN 3000 experience

2003-11-20 Thread Bill Thompson
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:49:22 -0500 Dan Didier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you use group functions, or is everyone in the base group? Thanks, Dan I am using FreeRadius with the VPN 3000. I have groups authenticating in the concentrator and user authentication through radius. The down

Re: Cisco VPN 3000 experience

2003-11-20 Thread Dustin Doris
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Bill Thompson wrote: On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:49:22 -0500 Dan Didier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you use group functions, or is everyone in the base group? Thanks, Dan I am using FreeRadius with the VPN 3000. I have groups authenticating in the concentrator and

Cisco VPN 3000 experience

2003-11-19 Thread Dan Didier
Hi list, I was wondering what peoples experiences have been with using FreeRadius with the cisco VPN 3000 concentrator. Are there any documents outlining this? Thanks, Dan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: Cisco VPN 3000 experience

2003-11-19 Thread Tom Miller
I have two 3005s and a 3015 that authenticate users via Freeradius. It just works right out of the box. I'm using our central LDAP directory that already contains user authentication info. -Tom On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 03:46:18PM -0500, Dan Didier wrote: Hi list, I was wondering what peoples

RE: Cisco VPN 3000 experience

2003-11-19 Thread Dan Didier
Do you use group functions, or is everyone in the base group? Thanks, Dan -Original Message- From: Tom Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 11/19/2003 4:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: Cisco VPN 3000 experience

Re: Cisco VPN 3000 experience

2003-11-19 Thread Alan DeKok
Dan Didier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Please fix your mailer to send text as text, instead of encoding it. Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name=winmail.dat Please also fix your mailer to not send

Re: Cisco VPN 3000 experience

2003-11-19 Thread Dustin Doris
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Dan Didier wrote: Hi list, I was wondering what peoples experiences have been with using FreeRadius with the cisco VPN 3000 concentrator. Are there any documents outlining this? Thanks, Dan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See

RE: Any experience with Symbol APs?

2003-01-28 Thread Philip Blow
I currently have a call into Symbol at the moment about the corrupted State attribute. But, after much trying I got the Symbol 4131AP working (to a point) with FreeRADIUS 0.8.1. To get around the State attribute problem I made the following changes below (but will not be keeping the changes for

Any experience with Symbol APs?

2003-01-20 Thread Chad Houston
I've seen several posts about the inconsistency of wireless access points. I'm trying to use FreeRADIUS 0.8.1, a Symbol AP4131, and EAP/MD5 (on Windows XP, *without* service pack 1). The identity request is received by FreeRADIUS, and the challenge is sent correctly back to the supplicant.

Re: Experience

2002-11-02 Thread Jared Quinn
Kostas Kalevras([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 09:53:09PM +0200: The only thing about MySQL for Authentication/Authorization is that it is used only for freeradius. You could use LDAP instead and base all your services on it. Not necessarilly the case, I use postgreSQL along with

RE: Experience

2002-11-01 Thread Franklin Trumpy
wrote: Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:07:23 -0500 From: Zack W Kneisley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Experience Very Interesting. I have been evaluating Radiator off and on and find it interesting that you would prefer FreeRADIUS over a $700

RE: Experience

2002-11-01 Thread Zack W Kneisley
] [mailto:freeradius-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Franklin Trumpy Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Experience Zack W Kneisley wrote: Very Interesting. I have been evaluating Radiator off and on and find it interesting that you would

RE: Experience

2002-11-01 Thread Kostas Kalevras
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Zack W Kneisley wrote: Thank you very much for your detailed answer to my questions. I am in the process of planning an ISP deployment with proxy and local clients, including wholesale dialup from Qwest, MegaPOP and Aleron, having multiple RADIUS servers downstream. I

RE: Experience

2002-11-01 Thread Zack W Kneisley
a system that uses MySQL exclusively for everything. Zack -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:freeradius-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kostas Kalevras Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 2:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Experience On Fri, 1 Nov 2002

RE: Experience

2002-11-01 Thread Mike Cathey
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 17:10, Zack W Kneisley wrote: Actually, I currently have a mail server setup on a MySQL backend for authentication and several other applications can use a MySQL backend for many functions, including ISP billing, and even DNS server I have seen that can get it's records

RE: Experience

2002-11-01 Thread Zack W Kneisley
Just from my experience with Radiator The have *.sql files that will setup the db nicely, including a radonline table for Simultaneous-Use, table for accounting and plus several others. This can be easily used as a template for your own db. I just find that having 1 backend system easier

RE: Experience

2002-11-01 Thread Mike Cathey
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 19:13, Zack W Kneisley wrote: Slightly OT, Mike, Does inserting the correct records in your db completely setup the users mailbox on the mail server, or is their another process required? I wish. The _only_ other procedure necessary to create an account is to make an

RE: Experience

2002-11-01 Thread Franklin Trumpy
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Zack W Kneisley wrote: Just from my experience with Radiator The have *.sql files that will setup the db nicely, including a radonline table for Simultaneous-Use, table for accounting and plus several others. If you're looking for something like this with FreeRADIUS, check

Experience

2002-10-29 Thread Zack W Kneisley
Title: Experience Ive been watching this list for some time now, and it seems that Freeradius is much more robust than I previously thought. Could some users of this list give me some configuration examples (users served, how many NASs using, Hardware OSs being used, using sql, how long you

Re: Experience

2002-10-29 Thread Gustavo A. Lozano
Hello We have using freeradius for over 2 years now. ahmm the count of RAS is like 35 in this moment. Platfforms: Linux Intel and Solaris Sparc. All support over LDAP right now, and works pretty cool. Pros: everything cons: ahmm, as we managed a central site, and the Terminal servers are around

Re: Experience

2002-10-29 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:12:38AM -0500, Zack W Kneisley wrote: I've been watching this list for some time now, and it seems that Freeradius is much more robust than I previously thought. Could some users of this list give me some configuration examples (users served, how many NAS's using,

Re: Experience

2002-10-29 Thread Angelos Karageorgiou
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Zack W Kneisley wrote: I've been watching this list for some time now, and it seems that Freeradius is much more robust than I previously thought. Could some users of this list give me some configuration examples (users served, how many NAS's using, Hardware OS's being

Re: Experience

2002-10-29 Thread Jared Quinn
Zak, We've been running FreeRadius here for just on a year now. We are running a cvs version from a few months ago which has been the most stable implementation for us - I must admit however that I've been scared to upgrade to the latest CVS due mostly to changes to the sql schema (i have

Re: Experience

2002-10-29 Thread Franklin Trumpy
| On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Zack W Kneisley wrote: Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:12:38 -0500 From: Zack W Kneisley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Freeradius-Users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Experience I've been watching this list for some time now, and it seems

RE: Experience

2002-10-29 Thread Zack W Kneisley
any details on the hardware that your setup is running on? Zack -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:freeradius-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Franklin Trumpy Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:31 PM To: Freeradius-Users Subject: Re: Experience I am running

Re: Experience

2002-10-29 Thread Alan DeKok
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cons of using Freeradius: I suspect we're the only people using Kerberos authentication with the current code. Pros of using Freeradius: it's the only Radius server I know of that supports Kerberos authentication. Huh? Is it that hard to add kerberos

Re: Experience

2002-10-29 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 02:49:00PM -0500, Alan DeKok wrote: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cons of using Freeradius: I suspect we're the only people using Kerberos authentication with the current code. Pros of using Freeradius: it's the only Radius server I know of that supports

my experience with freeradius+oracle

2002-05-04 Thread surd
hi, everyone: who can explain the error I met. I am puzzled by the errors when i am trying to usefreeradius+oracle. I know you have much experienceabout it. Can you give me a favor?I am using Redhat7.2+oracle8.1.7 on the same computerand the process of installation is nothing

AIX experience....

2002-04-12 Thread Nico . Baggus
File: 200204~1.gzHi all, I've managed to get freeradius up and running on AIX V4.3.3, with gcc. Limitations: dynamic loading doesn't realy work as expected. Example:the loading of f.e. rlm_unix works, but the calls to f.e. paircompare_register fail with sigsegv.